Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Radical Muslims’

The Hells Angels Biker Club captured a muslim migrant who was harassing a vulnerable woman, hunted him down and violently beat him for sexually assaulting her.

Read Full Post »

View our first post on the Pamela Geller “Draw Mohammad” contest: TMQ2 SALUTES…

From GOPUSA:

Shut Pam Geller Up, or We Will All Die

By Ben Shapiro | 13 May 2015

Last week, Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly announced that Pamela Geller, the woman who sponsored a draw Muhammad event in Texas, threatened America’s national security. Geller, said O’Reilly, “spurred a violent attack.” He continued, “Insulting the entire Muslim world is stupid. … It does not advance the cause of liberty or get us any closer to defeating the savage jihad.” On the same network, Juan Williams stated that Geller “engaged in gratuitous offensive behavior that led to the deaths of two people.” The New York Times editorialized that Geller “achieved her provocative goal” with her “exercise in bigotry and hatred posing as a blow for freedom.”

Geller, the narrative goes, should never have encouraged people to draw Muhammad because it was “provocative.” To which the answer should be: So what? Women attending school in Afghanistan “provokes” radical Muslims into throwing acid on their faces, but that does not mean that women should not go to school in Afghanistan or be condemned for doing so.

Geller, the narrative goes, made Americans less safe by provoking radical Muslims, as though Muslims have no responsibility to act like decent human beings — as though, faced with the prospect of a cartoon of their prophet, Muslims have no choice but to grab guns and go a-huntin’. But that’s nonsense. What truly spurs radical Muslims into violence is the well-evidenced belief that if they kill enough Muhammad cartoonists, soon people will stop drawing cartoons of Muhammad.

Geller, the narrative goes, was “Islamophobic” in her call for drawings of Muhammad; unlike Charlie Hebdo, Geller was not an equal opportunity offender of all religions, and therefore showed particular animus toward Islam. But failure to equally attack all religions does not make satire of one religion illegitimate — were that the case, The New York Times would have to answer why drawing Muhammad presents deep problems, but running simultaneous ads for the slanderous “Book of Mormon” musical is hunky-dory.

So, why the assault on Geller? The answer is simple: Too many Westerns have bought into the notion that personal responsibility can be jettisoned in favor of judgments about identity. Geller is the problem, in this view, because she is an upper-class Jewish woman from New York City; her rivals are poor Muslims from Phoenix. They are, by the nature of their identities, members of the victim class. She is, by contrast, a member of the victimizing class. Nothing either party can do can change their status in this equation. Therefore, according to Doonesbury cartoonist Garry Trudeau, even the Muslims who shot up Charlie Hebdo in France were justified: “Ridiculing the non-privileged is almost never funny — it’s just mean. … By attacking a powerless, disenfranchised minority with crude, vulgar drawings closer to graffiti than cartoons, Charlie wandered into the realm of hate speech.”

How do proponents of this victim/victimizer identity dichotomy determine who falls into which category? They simply look at the socioeconomic status of those involved and make a determination of who is worse off. Thus, black Baltimore rioters were not people acting without any sense of values, but rather victims provoked by injustice from a non-existent white power structure in Baltimore. Before a conflict has even begun, we know who deserves our sympathy.

That calculus leads to more death, more destruction, more chaos. That death, destruction and chaos cannot be laid at the feet of Pamela Geller, but those who continue to perpetuate a narrative in which people who commit evil acts are victims, and those who are their victims are their provocateurs.

Ben Shapiro, 31, is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, a radio host on KTTH 770 Seattle and KRLA 870 Los Angeles, editor-in-chief of TruthRevolt.org, and Senior editor-at-large of Breitbart News. He is The New York Times best-selling author of “Bullies.” His latest book, “The People vs. Barack Obama: The Criminal Case Against the Obama Administration,” will be released on June 10. He lives with his wife and daughter in Los Angeles. To find out more about Ben Shapiro and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at http://www.creators.com.

Read Full Post »

Ben Shapiro takes on Ben Affleck and the myth that only a tiny minority of Muslims worldwide are radical.

http://TruthRevolt.org

Read Full Post »

From WND:

Radical Muslims: We must kill them without mercy
Maj. Gen. Patrick Henry Brady says, ‘Troops on the ground win wars and keep the peace’

I recently saw a photo of an Arab child playing in some dismal street with the burning twin towers emblazoned on his T-shirt. In that photo were both the cause and the solution to the deadly threat of radical Islam.

Maj-Gen-Patrick-Henry-BradyRadical Islam will continue to kill as long as the Islamic children are taught that the U.S. (and other infidels) is the great Satan. This teaching must be stopped wherever it is found. It should not be difficult to do in America, if it exists. And if any country that receives American largess teaches it, that largess should be eliminated, be it tourism or aid.

It will take some generations for this strategy to bear fruit, a reality loathe to many Americans and most pols. We are a nation of sprinters; we don’t do well in long distance races. Get over it. If we care about our children, we better get on with it.

In the meantime, we must kill them without mercy. To these radical Islamists, negotiation is a time to rearm. They will die for their beliefs, our first such enemy since the kamikazes. We must facilitate their death to ensure our security.
(more…)

Read Full Post »

Islam is a violent cult, not a religion. Of course, you already knew this, right?

And Muslims aren’t ever actually insulted by the things they claim, or the fact that we’re too smart to be Muslims. It’s impossible to insult these brainwashed dinosaurs. Violent Muslims don’t require insults in order to justify their violence against non Muslims, but they prefer to pretend they do. Their entire process is bull shit! They’ll use any excuse — manufactured, propagated or otherwise — to act out their anger and violence. In reality, having non Muslims to victimize is all they need, and if the victims happen to be Jews, they view it as a two-for-one bonus — excuses be damned.

If it’s not a film, a cartoon, perceived decadence of the West, someone’s words, a bad hair day or some other flimsy excuse they can exploit, they’ll cook one up or just attack innocent people without alleged provocation. In short, don’t believe their lies and propaganda, people. They’re coming after us no matter what we do because the Qur’an and their psycho clerics tell them to.

This ends any confusion over Islam being a religion of peace. It’s clearly a religion of death.

I believe in religious tolerance as long as we are tolerating a religion and the particular religion is a peaceful one. I don’t believe in tolerating death cults. In the case of Islam, zero tolerance is the appropriate response. In fact, Islam itself is an insult to humanity, and those who practice it insult the rest of us each and every day.

Muslims go on the rampage every few hundred years and it always ends basically the same way. Their well-trodden asses get kicked, demoralized, humiliated, and punk’d. These jihad cowards are super-gluttons for punishment and deserve all the punishment they receive.

How long a Muslim reign of terror lasts is directly proportional to how strongly their victims strike back. For example, apologize and they step up attacks because they perceive weakness. Cut their balls off and they run like scared little school girls.

Apologizing to these animals for things we supposedly did to insult their non-prophet madman is tantamount to a battered woman apologizing to her abuser. Make no mistake, Islamofascists are the abusers and we are their victims. I don’t know about you, but I don’t apologize to anyone who attacks me. I kick the living shit out of them.

There is only one real solution when dealing with violent Islamofascists—lethal force!

The Obama white house knows all of these things, yet they maintain the apologist posture in spite of how we the peeps feel about it. Their silence is deafening, and their inaction further endangers us all.

Obama’s irresolute and impotent talk is tantamount to broadcasting to our enemies and the rest of the world that Americans either believe the violence perpetrated by Muslims against our citizens is justified or that we are too cowardly to strike back. This empowers the perpetrators and allows them to go largely unpunished. Meanwhile, the murderous thugs laugh at our weakness and continue to kill, knowing their campaigns can continue unabated.

Our president is either a cowardly apologist or he sides with them. All indications point to the latter. Either way, he is of absolutely no help to us and of great help to them. So, we must decide for ourselves how we want to deal with the Islamic threat because our current government is turning a blind eye to it, thereby rendering us vulnerable targets for the Islamic psychos.

This is no game, folks. It’s a matter of life or death. It’s time to vote Barack Hussein MobamaD out of office so we can resume snuffing out his Islamic buddies wherever they rear their ugly heads. We need to step up taking the fight to them, American style.


Hadith Oliyankara Juma Masjid

Read Full Post »

Every cop in the world should see these videos from England.

Who would have believed there would come a day when we would see uniformed police officers fleeing before a mob of rag tag religious [MUSLIM] zealots. It is enough to make any freedom-loving person want to cry. I fear that we might see this in the streets of the United States within the next four years.

Read Full Post »

The following is the last paragraph in a Slate article by Christopher Hitchens from July 30, 2007 entitled God-Fearing People: Why are we so scared of offending Muslims?.

“It is often said that resistance to jihadism only increases the recruitment to it. For all I know, this commonplace observation could be true. But, if so, it must cut both ways. How about reminding the Islamists that, by their mad policy in Kashmir and elsewhere, they have made deadly enemies of a billion Indian Hindus? Is there no danger that the massacre of Iraqi and Lebanese Christians, or the threatened murder of all Jews, will cause an equal and opposite response? Most important of all, what will be said and done by those of us who take no side in filthy religious wars? The enemies of intolerance cannot be tolerant, or neutral, without inviting their own suicide. And the advocates and apologists of bigotry and censorship and suicide-assassination cannot be permitted to take shelter any longer under the umbrella of a pluralism that they openly seek to destroy.”

Are you listening Achmadinejad and all the rest of you radical Muslim fanatics and murderers? Of course not. Just remember, he who lives by the sword gets shot by those who don’t.

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: