Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Palestinians’

Evidently some groups are more entitled to the right of national self-determination.

The incessant crybaby tantrums for the “Palestinians” to have this right overshadows the same right being negated or denied for the following:

Jews

Kurds

Catalans

Basques

Tibetans

Assyrians

Chaldeans

Read Full Post »

Donald Trump: Move the Palestinians to Puerto Rico

The Donald

The Donald

NEW YORK – Billionaire Republican presidential contender Donald Trump has unveiled a controversial peace proposal for the strife-torn holy land: give the U.S. island territory of Puerto Rico to the Palestinians as compensation for surrendering to Israel.

According to the so-called “Trump Solution,” rolled out by the outspoken business magnate at a Manhattan press conference, the U.S. would fund the relocation of all four or so million Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza Strip to the Caribbean archipelago, and offer them “free housing, job training and a lifetime supply of deodorant.”

“It’s perfect. Puerto Rico is over 1,000 square miles bigger than the West Bank and Gaza, far more fertile, and the influx of millions of migrants will jumpstart [sic] its economic recovery,” Trump explained. “I’ll even build them an exact replica of that darn mosque they’re always killing innocent Israelis over.” Unlike native Puerto Ricans, however, the so-called “Puertostinians” would not be able to relocate to the U.S. proper if they don’t like their new homeland: “We’re overrun by Mexican criminals as it is.”

Welcome to ‘Trump Gaza’

The real estate mogul then unraveled a relabeled map of Puerto Rico, pointing to where he plans to build an adults-only mega resort on the archipelago’s second largest island, to be renamed ‘Isla De Gaza.’

“There’s a fortune to be made by fulfilling people’s jihadist sex fantasies on a Disney-scale, he said, outlining some of the main attractions of ‘Trump Gaza’: a topless ’72 Virgins Casino,’ “Safari-style” tours to mock refugee and jihadist training camps, ‘Shoot Your Own Rocket’ and ‘Dig Your Own tunnel’ workshops, ‘Catch a Zionist’ competitions, ‘Torture a POW’ sessions, as well as underground “Abu Ghraib-themed” BDSM parties. “Let the Puertostinians both preserve and profit from their native culture,” Trump said.

(Click on image to enlarge)

The NEW Palestine

While Puerto Rico’s governor slammed the ‘Trump Solution’ as racist (“We refuse to become a minority in our own land”), Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas responded by offering Trump some humor-laced advice: “From one old man to another, it’s time to age gracefully – all that fake tan, collagen and Viagra are rotting your brain.”

From themideastbeast.com

Read Full Post »

In the interests of objectivity and what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, let’s ponder the following concept.

Why is it that one group of Arab Muslims can fabricate a false history as a distinctive ethnography, claim a nation-state based on this false premise, and garner support throughout the world while another group of Arab Muslims a few hundred miles away do the same thing albeit with more historic validity and the world comes down on them.

ISIS, denying the presence of international borders seeking the creation of their own nation or Caliphate is no different from the Arabs of Israel, Judea and Samaria.

They both are despotic abusers of their own subjects, follow the precepts of the Koran, use terror tactics on any opposition and like to hump goats.

Why are Palestinians any more entitled than the rapidly gestating ISISTAN?

At least there is more historic accuracy of a Caliphate that existed for hundreds of years than the myth of a distinct nation made of “Palestinian” Muslims that never existed and was never even thought about until 1967.

Read Full Post »

anjem-choudryjpg

abbas

Read Full Post »

From algemeiner.com:

How Hillary Clinton Enabled Hamas’ Construction of Terror Tunnels

Much has been said and written about the terror tunnels that Hamas built in Gaza. But too little has been said about who it was that put the cement into Hamas’ hands, thus making the construction of the tunnels possible in the first place.

Until now.

HillBillary Clinton

HillBillary Clinton

In a bombshell revelation, Dennis Ross, the senior Mideast policy adviser to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from 2009 to 2011, has admitted that it was he who was assigned the task of pressuring Israel to ease up on its military blockade of Gaza.

“I argued with Israeli leaders and security officials, telling them they needed to allow more construction materials, including cement, into Gaza so that housing, schools and basic infrastructure could be built,” Ross revealed in the Washington Post on August 10. “They countered that Hamas would misuse it, and they were right.”

Not that Hillary’s State Department had been acting independently of the White House on the issue of cement. For example, Vice President Joe Biden told interviewer Charlie Rose on Bloomberg TV in 2010: “We have put as much pressure and as much cajoling on Israel as we can to allow them to get building materials” and other forbidden items into Gaza.

But now that Mrs. Clinton is attempting to distance herself from the president’s debacles in foreign affairs, Ross’ admission shows that it was she who sent her personal envoy to push for a policy that ultimately enabled Hamas to build the terror tunnels.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

The Iranian Ambassador to the UN had just finished giving a speech and walked out into the lobby of the convention center where he was introduced to a U.S. Marine General.

As they talked, the Iranian said, “I have just one question about what I have seen in America.”

The General said, “Well, anything I can do to help?”

The Iranian whispered, “My son watches this show called Star Trek and in it there is Kirk who is Canadian, Chekhov who is Russian, Scotty who is Scottish, Uhura who is black, and Sulu who is Japanese, but there are NO Muslims. My son is very upset and doesn’t understand why there aren’t any Iranians, Iraqis, Afghans, Egyptians, Palestinians, Saudis, Syrians, or Pakistanis on Star Trek.”

The General leaned toward the Iranian Ambassador, and whispered in his ear, “That’s because it takes place in the future…”

(h/t Shlomo Muslim PhD)

Read Full Post »

By John Bolton, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations

bolton

Israel’s effort to destroy Hamas’ underground Gaza Strip infrastructure is about defeating terrorism, yes — but even graver issues are involved.

Hamas’s long record of indiscriminate rocket attacks (over 11,000 since Israel left Gaza in 2005), its suicide bombers and its determination to destroy the Jewish state are all too real.

This is more than ample justification for Israel not just to retaliate against Hamas, but to destroy it.

But in Gaza today, Israel is also battling the existential peril of Iran’s nuclear program.

Despite Hamas’ 2011 refusal to support Assad in Syria, Iran never forgot Hamas’ potential usefulness against “the little Satan”; Tehran and Hamas have resumed their strategic partnership.

By confronting Hamas, Israel is simultaneously also striving against the fear of a new holocaust courtesy of Iranian nuclear weapons.

Removing or at least substantially degrading this mortal threat is the key imperative in Gaza, and could take considerable time to accomplish.

Appreciating this objective requires understanding the interwoven layers of deterrence and military capability involved in Israel’s war on Iran’s nuclear threat.

Of course, a nuclear Iran is not simply Israel’s problem, but America’s as well. Unfortunately, Washington and its allies have abdicated their responsibilities.

President Obama says repeatedly that “all options are on the table,” but no one really believes he’ll ever order military strikes against Iran’s nuclear program, and few think the endless talks with Iran will even slow Tehran’s progress. Israel is the only power that may act.

Yet Iran’s most likely response to an Israeli attack would be to unleash Hamas and Hezbollah against the Israeli civilian population.

A direct Iranian attack on Israel is unlikely, since Tehran wouldn’t want to risk an Israeli nuclear response. Retaliating indirectly through its terrorist surrogates is safer, while providing an air of plausible deniability.

Other options (closing the Strait of Hormuz; attacking US forces in the region) are highly unlikely, since they’d prompt an American military response, even from Obama.

(Incidentally, an Israeli strike would not prompt a broader Middle East war, because key Arab states also oppose a nuclear Iran.)

Thus the Hamas and Hezbollah arsenals in Gaza and southern Lebanon are crucial.

Most of Hamas’ rockets are short-range and not terribly accurate. If they hit civilian targets, they are of course lethal, but for Hamas their main use is as a weapon of terror.

After the 2006 Hezbollah-Israel war, however, Tehran not only replenished Hezbollah’s more muscular missile stockpiles, but also substantially upgraded Hamas’ assets. Longer-range missiles began appearing in Gaza, smuggled in courtesy of Iran, such as the Fajr-5 and the Khaibar (Syrian-built from Iranian design).

As recently as March, Israel intercepted the Klos-C in the Red Sea carrying Khaibar missiles, mortars and assault-rifle ammunition, which Israel credibly says were Gaza-bound. Although shipping records were counterfeited, Iran was undoubtedly the source.

Thus Iran could order the launching of longer-range, more accurate missiles from both Lebanon and Gaza, substantially increasing the threat to Israel.

Despite Israel’s huge strides in missile defense, especially Iron Dome, such systems can still be defeated by overwhelming them with large numbers of rockets arriving simultaneously on a given target, especially if they’re launched from two disparate locations.

Iran fully understands the deterrent effect these missiles have on any Israeli government contemplating a pre-emptive strike. The Khaibar’s range of about 200 miles means it can strike Israel’s port of Haifa from Gaza.

With its 50-mile range, the Fajr-5 can hit Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and Israel’s Dimona nuclear reactor. (Missile ranges rise or fall depending on the weight of the weapons payload being carried.)

Israel needs to feel confident it can successfully attack Iran’s nuclear program without risking unacceptable civilian losses when Tehran retaliates via Hamas and Hezbollah.

Thus, Israel should destroy Hamas’ missile capabilities now, as well as any unmanned aerial vehicles in Gaza that might disperse biological or chemical weapons.

Ideally, Israel would do the same to Hezbollah — which helps explain why Hezbollah has held back during the current hostilities.

But there is little doubt that Iran and Hamas desperately hope John Kerry or others will manage to impose a cease-fire in Gaza before their stocks of long-range missiles are uncovered and destroyed.

This is why it is so important that Israel continue its Gaza operations for as long as it deems necessary, precisely to destroy those missiles.

In so doing, Israel is acting not only in its own legitimate self-defense, but in America’s as well.

Read Full Post »

I wonder how long it will be before California, Arizona, and Texas will be bombarded by rockets from Mexico?

When we return fire, will the MSM—and especially the UN—accuse us of being the aggressor?

Will the world unfairly turn on us as they have Israel?

Will our country be known one day as Gazexico?

If the liberals have their way, the U.S. will no longer be a sovereign nation.

If the Mexicans have their way, the US will be annexed and become part of Mexico.

Both are currently using Mexican illegals as one of their tools to blur our borders.

What the liberals are blind to is what the monumental negative effect on the entire world will be if the U.S. were to cease to exist.

Just imagine a collapsing house of cards.

So, I say, fuck Mexico, fuck the liberals, fuck Hamas, and double fuck the UN.

While we’re at it, fuck the worthless turd in the white house and her treacherous husband.

Fuck Mexico!

The future president of Gazexico

Also read: MEXICO – AMERICA’S PALESTINE – PART DOS

Read Full Post »

Invasion

hamas_defense_shield

obamas-stance-on-foreign-relations

Read Full Post »

We have seen that the value of an Arab Muslim’s life is nil.

Not because we are racists, imperialists, colonialists, or elitists.

It’s because as I have said before, it’s the value they have placed on it themselves, and the world, in its entirety, accepts.

They blow themselves up at the drop of a hat, and kill as easily as look at each other.

Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, you name it – if not now, in the past.

Hundreds of thousands dead, and no one blinks an eye.

Unless it’s a ‘Palestinian’.

Then the whole world comes to a stop.

My mistake, only certain ‘Palestinians’

Not the ones killed by Jordan. Not the ones killed by Syria. Only the ones killed by Israelis.

A fraction of all the Arab Muslims ever killed, these are the only Arab deaths that cry out for justice, vengeance and pity.

These are the only Arab Muslim deaths that demand a high price.

Why?

Because these are the only ones that can be used to justify the hatred that defies logic. Antisemitism.

No one gives a shit about dead Arabs, ‘Palestinian’ or otherwise unless they can be used to thinly disguise Jew hatred.

It’s time the world be told that this farce is exposed and is no longer valid.

What was the value of Chechen lives when Russia needed to defend itself?

What was the value of German or Japanese lives when the Allies needed to win World War 2?

The world market need to re-evaluate the cost of a ‘Palestinian’ life, especially when Hamas purposely places them in harm’s way thinking they can exploit the hatred of Jews for their political game.

It’s time for new rules:

  1. Pull all IDF forces out of Gaza.
  2. Carpet bomb any area suspected of harboring rocket fire, just like it was Berlin or Tokyo.
  3. Send the IDF back in after sufficient degradation and demand the unconditional surrender of Hamas leadership, then try them as war criminals.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: