Street Preacher is attacked by Muslim while preaching at a Lady Gaga Concert. This may be a bad thing but what is worse is the way the police handled the attack. They actually charge the Christian with battery. They would not view the video nor did they talk to any of the witnesses. Here is the video you be the judge and then call the Tampa police department and tell them to drop these trumped up charges and do their job properly. Case # 11-217735, ORI# 0290200 The (I hate to give him this title) police officers name and badge number are Kevin Krupa Badge # 565.
. . . He Instantly Learns What She Was Hiding All Along.
The most dangerous people often don’t look dangerous at all. That’s what this man found out at some kind of dance party when he thought he could force a woman to dance with him against her will.
A man who is being described as an “Indian Muslim” appeared to carelessly grab the woman, clearly expecting her to submit to his advances and go along with whatever he had planned.
The problem for him was that she appeared much more ready for physical confrontation that he did.
The man’s persistence can be seen in the video, allowing himself to engage the clearly more capable female fighter.
The whereabouts of the event were unknown, but the man’s actions appear to be consistent with the law of Islam which place men’s rights above the rights of women.
According to strict interpretations of Shariah law, women in the Islamic faith are prohibited from defending themselves from accusation in the way that men may be able to, and when there’s question about the way a sexual incident occurred, it’s women who often find themselves being punished for being victims of a sex crime.
Rapes have led to death for the female victim in many instances. While this may appear to be a simple case of wanting a dance, it’s certainly not clear where that would lead.
The only defense for a woman seems to be the ability to physically protect herself so that things don’t escalate. Embarrassment is a valuable tool for women in places where they have no rights.
H/T Mad World News
If young European women and girls, even as young as ten years old, bear the burden of rape and sexual assault as a direct result of their provocative dress and actions;
And Jews are responsible for Antisemitism in thought and deed by simply being Jewish;
Then just maybe…….
“Islamophobia” can justifiably be blamed on Muslims.
Stop being so Islamic and “Islamophobia” will go away.
What’s good for the toilet is good for the feces floating in it.
We must all join together and condemn France for the disproportionate response to the acts of resistance carried out in Paris last week.
France must be pressured to do whatever it takes to end the cycle of violence between the French and Muslims.
Countless innocent lives are being taken by indiscriminate French air attacks that target civilians.
We call on all entities, both public and private to boycott French products, academics and services; divest from any economic ventures; and sanction the country of France under the harshest of terms.
We only want to see Frenchmen and Muslims living side by side in peace in two states.
Muslims should not have to endure living under French occupation.
We are all ISIS
I’d label every death ‘Workplace Disagreements’.
If one cannot understand that every move our illegal prez makes is against the Jews and for the terrorists, they should lose their right to vote and right to be a religious Jew.
Look at all the mosques — easy targets — five times a day!
Thank God all these ISIS goat humpers are coming here so we wouldn’t need to travel in order to separate their bodies from their heads.
Every time the muslim call to prayer is sounded, we could snipe the asshole doing the call.
ISIS is our newest target, and being the target of the USA is strictly a deadly business.
We could even ship their severed heads to their families in boxes with their tiny balls stuffed inside their dead mouths.
ISIS is made up of Neanderthal, dog-shit dung beetles.
Luke 21: “When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are safe. But when someone stronger attacks and overpowers him, he takes away the armor in which the man trusted and divides up his plunder.”
In a fit of rage, Obama snaps at U.S.military brass: “Don’t you dare try and paint all of Islam with the same brush.” Showing his Muslim stripes, Obama threw a hissy fit and stomped out of a Pentagon meeting about the bombing campaign against ISIS over remarks allegedly tying the Islamic State (ISIS) to Islam.
His tantrum reportedly took place in the afternoon of last week just prior to the president’s departure to Camp David. It was an informal briefing on the expanded bombing campaigns to take place in both Syria and Iraq. Halfway through the already very brief briefing, President Obama stood up clearly agitated, and walked out of the room.
The casually dressed Obama returned to the briefing moments later with a senior adviser alongside him, though his mood continued to indicate he was still very upset.
The senior adviser made a couple pointed remarks to the Pentagon representatives, reminded them the president had already had a very busy day, and then both she and the president once again left the room. Within seconds, Barack Obama returned again to the just concluded briefing, pointing at the still seated Pentagon staff and indicating how “inappropriate” it was to “try and paint all of Islam with the same brush.” The president repeated similar remarks, his mood going from agitation to outrage. His voice carried to several other West Wing offices.
The senior adviser, who did not originally return with the president into the briefing, suddenly re-appeared alongside him, as well as the president’s personal aide. She was smiling, and telling everyone “we’re done here” which she repeated several times and then led the president back out into the hallway.
“There are none so blind as those who will not see.”
When you read this you will understand why Obama refuses to say the words “radical Islam.”
I didn’t originate this, but it checked out with Google and Snopes.
Did you know that we now have a Muslim government?
John Brennan, current head of the CIA converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia.
Obama’s top advisor, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim who was born in Iran where her parents still live.
Hillary Clinton’s top advisor, Huma Abedin is a Muslim, whose mother and brother are involved in the now outlawed Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is a Muslim.
Homeland Security Advisor, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim.
Obama advisor and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam al-Marayati, is a Muslim.
Obama’s Sharia Czar, Imam Mohamed Magid, of the Islamic Society of North America is a Muslim.
Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, Eboo Patel, is a Muslim.
And last but not least, our closet Muslim himself, Barack Hussein Obama.
It’s questionable if Obama ever officially took the oath of office when he was sworn in. He didn’t repeat the oath properly to defend our nation and our Constitution. Later the Democrats claimed he was given the oath again in private?
CIA director John Brennan took his oath on a copy of the Constitution, not a Bible.
Congressman, Keith Ellison took his oath on a copy of the Qur’an.
Congresswoman Michele Bachman [sic] was vilified and almost tarred and feathered by Democrats when she voiced her concern about Muslims taking over our government.
Considering all these appointments, it would explain why Obama and his minions are systematically destroying our nation, supporting radical Muslim groups worldwide, opening our southern border, and turning a blind eye to the genocide being perpetrated on Christians all over Africa and the Middle East.
The more damage Obama does, the more arrogant he’s become!
“One of Obama’s chief opponents alleges the president ‘views himself primarily as a Muslim and acts accordingly in favoring Islamic interests,’ at the cost of Jewish and Christian lives. That’s why he’s taking this dramatic step.”
– – –
OBAMA NAMED IN RICO LAWSUIT
Attorney Larry Klayman, fresh off a preliminary court ruling that the National Security Agency’s spying on Americans likely is unconstitutional, now has named President Obama and others in a racketeering complaint.
Klayman, founder of Freedom Watch and a columnist for WND, alleges the president and others laundered U.S. taxpayer money that was spent on Hamas rockets fired against Israel.
The civil lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington falls under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, alleges criminal acts by Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon.
Seeking $1.5 billion in compensatory damages as well as punitive damages, it accuses the global figures of “laundering U.S. dollars” to Hamas, which is officially designated by the U.S. government as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.
“This money has been foreseeably used to buy rockets and construct tunnels to attack Israel and terrorize and kill American and dual American-Israeli citizens who reside or are located in Israel,” Klayman said in a statement.
“The nation and the world have increasingly come to see that Obama views himself primarily as a Muslim and acts accordingly in favoring Islamic interests over Judeo-Christian ones, and the complaint lays out Obama’s history in documented detail,” he said.
Klayman said Obama’s actions “were calculated to harm the nation of Israel.”
“His facilitating and ordering financial and other material aid to Hamas, along with his equally anti-Israel Secretaries of State Kerry and Clinton, and the U.N. Secretary General, is just the latest deadly chapter in what amounts to criminal activity which has logically resulted in harm and death to Jews and Christians and threatens the continued existence of Israel,” he said.
“That is why he and the other defendants were sued under RICO and other relevant laws,” said Klayman.
The White House media office declined to respond by telephone to a request from WND for comment, instructing a reporter to send an email. There was no immediately [sic] response to the email inquiry.
The case, No. 14-1484, alleges the defendants conspired to send hundreds of millions of dollars to Hamas “under the false pretext that this financial support will be used for humanitarian purposes.”
“However,” the complaint states, “as recently reported by Voice of America and the New York Times, the recent killing of the chief Hamas financial officer by the IDF confirmed that these U.S. dollars, only some of which [were] found in his bombed out car, [have] predictably fallen into the hands of Hamas’ terrorist wing, which controls and was elected by Gazans to govern over them.”
Klayman’s recent case against the NSA challenged its program of spying on Americans. Two privacy-rights heavyweights, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, recently filed friend-of-the-court briefs in support of Klayman’s arguments.
The case has been advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Klayman sued the NSA over the collection of telephone metadata from Verizon customers that was detailed in documents released by intelligence-document leaker Edward Snowden. In December 2013, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon issued a preliminary ruling that the program was likely unconstitutional, and the case is currently on appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
His newest complaint, with himself and a number of John Does as plaintiffs, is a civil action and seeks damages from the defendants “for violating plaintiffs’ and decedents’ rights, for engaging in racketeering and other prohibited activities, for engaging in international terrorism, for harboring and concealing terrorists, for providing material support to terrorists and terrorist groups, for directly and proximately causing the deaths of plaintiffs’ decedents, and for directly and proximately causing mental anguish, severe emotional distress, emotional pain and suffering, and the loss of society, earnings, companionship, comfort, protection, care, attention, advice, counsel or guidance, plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and their sons, plaintiffs’ decedents, have experienced and will experience in the future.”
It alleges fraud, money-laundering, mail fraud, wire fraud, conversion and corruption.
The complaint notes Klayman recently was in Israel when it was attacked by Hamas.
Klayman, it says, “was subject to terroristic threats, fear, intimidation and blackmail from Hamas, aimed at coercing him from the exercise of his legal rights in violation of the Hobbs Act by Hamas seeking to deny his freedom of travel and public advocacy and business activities in Israel and other activities in Israel by threats and intimidation aimed at coercing him as a person engaged in public advocacy and business activities in and with Israel to leave Israel and disengage with Israel.”
Other “John Doe” plaintiffs also were in Israel at the time of the attacks, the complaint states.
It explains that, according to the law, a person “knowingly finances terrorism when fully aware of facts that would inform an alert person of average intelligence that the probable results of their actions will be to provide funding to a terrorist organization.”
“One may not naively turn a blind eye, not even a president of the United States,” the complaint states.
It says considerable amounts of charity money, public assistance, international assistance and humanitarian aid is motivated toward ending the violence in the Holy Land, but it “gets diverted to the corrupt enterprise, and becomes money that – fell off a truck into the hands of the criminals actually causing the violence and their enablers.”
The complaint says all of the defendants know or have reason to know that “funds and material support provided to Gaza under Hamas’s rule are actually used entirely or in the most part to finance the acts of terrorism, violence, murder, attempted murder, kidnapping, assault, injury, physical attacks, and other criminal activity by Hamas.’
The complaint says the defendants known [as] Hamas uses building materials for home-made rockets and underground bunkers.
The complaint also notes Obama knows Hamas is officially designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by State Department and uses resources it receives for terrorist attacks, including the $900 million the Obama administration sent to Gaza in 2009.
It even accuses Obama of “siding with” militants known as “ISIS or ISIL, signaling to the people of Israel and Jews and Christians that Hamas’ crimes against Israel and Jews and Christians are tacitly supported and approved of by the president of the United States.”
The case also names Malik Obama, a half-brother of the president who runs the Barack Obama Foundation. The case alleges the organization raises money for the Muslim Brotherhood.
“Two leaked classified documents show Egyptian security forces have been monitoring Malik Obama’s activities and they also implicate President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton in the aiding and abetting of terrorists.”
Klayman explained the documents were entered as evidence in the criminal trials of former Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi and other top Muslim Brotherhood leaders.
I wrote this post the night before last, BILL O’REILLY KNOWS IT ALL, and watched Bill O’Reilly’s show last night.
One of his reader emails asked him, “Bill, you say Obama was not born in Kenya and he’s not Muslim. Where’s your proof?”
Bill has stated many times that Obama isn’t Muslim and wasn’t born in Kenya without providing any real proof whatsoever.
Bill answered in a bait and switch sort of way.
Instead of backing up his statement, Bill offered the retort that it was this person’s responsibility to provide proof even though he made no statement about Obama.
He simply asked Bill to prove his statement.
Most peeps probably didn’t catch this twist.
Bill garnished his retort by stating he had already checked Obama’s birth records in Hawaii and they were authentic, but made no mention of the ‘Muslim’ question.
Sure, Bill, we believe you.
What was it, another Watter’s World covert mission?
So, either Bill is a document expert, or he still owes us proof based on his own rules.
Do we now have to prove Bills points for him? Is this burden now on our shoulders?
As I wrote before, Catholic guilt and clogged suprarenal glands are crippling the real Bill.
I provided a video link where Obama himself admits to being Muslim.
I guess Bill didn’t see that one even thought he aired it on his show about 5 years ago.
So, I’m back to my original essay about Bill and Obama posted in February of 2013:
I still love ya, Bill. I’m just sayin’…
Bill O’Reilly says Obama is not a Muslim and wasn’t born in Kenya, but offers no proof on these points, yet he demands proof on all other points made by anyone on The Factor.
He says the radio hosts get it right and those of us who maintain that Obama is Muslim and was born in Kenya are fanatics.
How does he know?
Where’s the proof, proof boy?
The fact is, blogs get it right, the radio and TV boys steal from us.
That’s a fact, Jack.
Bill presumes to speak for the military at times, like how Obama should have bombed the ISIS onslaught in Iraq, yet he has never served in the military and knows little about it.
Ask any veteran if someone who has never served in the military could understand how it really is.
And if one wants to ask questions about national defense, why not forget the generals and politicians and ask those who have to do the actual fighting?
I like Bill, but he certainly does not speak for this old, salty veteran.
Bill O’Reilly is a Catholic boy who doesn’t have the balls to come out and tell us what he really thinks.
That Catholic guilt thing is still clogging up his suprarenal glands.
He tells us what he must in order to keep his ratings up. Period.
Hell, I might do the same thing if I were Catholic and trying to keep high ratings, but this doesn’t excuse Bill.
He seems to believe he has the answers to all the problems in society.
Who died and made him the top knot?
Like I said, his suprarenal glands are clogged.
Blogs are the cutting edge.
Radio and TV personalities are parrots.
Bill is a parrot.
Remember that, Bill.
Long live the blogs and the cutting-edge bloggers!
– – –
By the way, Bill, the word “resources” is not pronounced “reZources”.
And there is no such word in the English language as “foward”.
There are only two choices, “forward” and “foreword”.
Look ’em up, big guy.
Next thing we know, you’ll be telling us to vote for Koskinen from the IRS as the next prez.
Thank God you have Dennis Miller around to keep you straight.
– – –
A communist, a Muslim, and an illegal alien walk into a bar.
The bartender says, “Hello Mr. President!”