Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Jimmy Carter’

http://nypost.com/2017/09/23/valerie-plames-new-anti-semitic-game/

Hey Valerie – SHUT THE FUCK UP

Read Full Post »

mlk

Barack Hussein Obama, yemach shemo.

Two Hebrew words to be forever associated with America’s Islamist-in-Chief.

May his name be blotted out.

He is now in the good company of others whose names are always followed by this phrase.

i.e. Haman, Hitler, Stalin,

Eichman, Mengele, and Amin al-Husseini.

Read Full Post »

douche-bagWhich is worse?

“Fake news” is the new buzzword for the purpose of a left wing shutdown of free speech, for those of you who have their heads up their asses.

How’s this for fake news douche bags?

The Libyan embassy was attacked because of a video.

We have blocked Iran from having nuclear weapons.

Donald Trump hacked the voting machines to rig the election.

That’s not only fake it’s fecal.

The next time some ass hat brings up “fake news”, if you love America, if you love TMQ2, please tell them with confidence and authority,

“SHUT THE FUCK UP”

Read Full Post »

This most recent selection is Andrew Scott Cooper’s The Fall of Heaven.

It’s all about the Islamist take down of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in 1979.

indexAn informative read for those not alive at the time and for those who can relive those days through a prism not available then.

The shah’s downfall and replacement with a radical, fundamentalist, Islamist theocracy was the first domino to fall in the ongoing clash of cultures knocking into dominoes around us now.

The three takeaways are in no articular order are;

  1. The Shah, according to Cooper was very reluctant to crack down harshly on the nascent uprising when it could have been nipped in the bud before the Islamists took it over. This may have sugar-coated the Shah’s role as I remember meeting Iranian refugees in the late 70s who fled from Savak, the Shah’s secret police.
  2. The Americas, i.e. the Carter Administration and ambassador Sullivan were inept, incompetent, incapable and ignorant when it came to understanding Persian culture, the events unfolding and what America’s interests actually were.
  3. The duplicity and deception on the part of  Khomeini and his ilk in achieving their goal. The organizational methods, strategies and tactics were similar to what is being used today to foment Islamic supremacy worldwide.

The big lesson here is that our leaders are not immune from stupidity and can be easily outmaneuvered by believing those with a proven track record of untrustworthy behavior.

Mr. Trump please read this book.

Read Full Post »

Happy Nakbullshit Day losers.

The most misrepresented  event in world history.

Cuz Emakh.

Am Yisroel Chai Motherfuckers.

Read Full Post »

If there was ever a need for proof that black is indeed beautiful, look no further than Chloe Simone Valdary.

Chloe is a student at the University of New Orleans and has a beautiful heart and soul to match her beautiful looks.

She really outdid herself with her latest post exposing the hypocrisy of the anti- Zionists Semites.

We link to her blog on the roll, so check it out.

Chloe Simone Valdary

Chloe Simone Valdary

Read Full Post »

Obama: The lying Arab sissy in our white house. Aren’t you proud?

obama_carter

From GOPUSA:

Worse than Jimmy Carter

It’s official. Jimmy Carter is no longer the worst president in American history.

The crown of shame has been passed from the former peanut farmer to our weak, lead-from-behind community organizer, whose lack of foreign policy experience and gravitas has come into full embarrassing display. And with ISIS on the march — and now threatening to assassinate Pope Francis — President Obama’s abysmal approval ratings have Democrats ducking for cover.

A CBS News/New York Times poll released yesterday — which shows approval ratings for Obama’s foreign policy at a record low 34 percent, with a whopping 58 percent disapproving — delivered a cold shower to vulnerable Democrats in the fast approaching midterm elections. Their days are numbered. Better polish up those resumes now.

The question is, how did we get here? The history books will have a bottomless pit of colossal blunders to choose from. Start with Obama’s decision to play countless rounds of golf and attend 48 Democrat fundraisers this year, all while ignoring ISIS’ massive surge. Just last January, remember, he dismissed ISIS as a “JV” terrorist team.

Let’s not forget his head-scratching judgment when he released five dangerous Gitmo terrorists for an American POW — unbeknownst to Congress. With terror threats at their highest levels since 9/11, why on earth would any president release dangerous militants back to the Middle East to re-up with jihad?

Never mind the fact that the Foley family — whose son James was savagely beheaded by ISIS — has now come forward saying the Obama administration threatened them if they negotiated with ISIS. Can anyone say hypocrisy?

The White House has continuously sent conflicting messages to the world on how it will handle ISIS. Secretary of State John Kerry said last week that we’re not at war with Islamic State — “what we are doing is engaging in a very significant counterterrorism.”

Then the next day the White House said, “No, we’re at war.” Then Obama told the American people the U.S. will degrade and destroy ISIS — only to backpedal shortly thereafter and say he’s aiming instead to make ISIS a “manageable problem.”

The president has also stated emphatically that “we won’t have boots on the ground” in Iraq. But then Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, tells Congress that if airstrikes fail to achieve their military objective, we may need to deploy ground troops.

Who’s minding the store?

It’s taken six years of scandals, cover-ups and incompetence, but the American people have finally caught up with the truth about the empty suit that is Barack Obama.

——

Adriana Cohen is a columnist for the Boston Herald and co-host of “Trending Now” on Boston Herald Radio. Follow her on Twitter @AdrianaCohen16.

——

Also see: OBAMA UNSEATS CARTER AS WORST PREZ EVER! – from 18 June 2014

Read Full Post »

From WND:

YeeHaaaaw!!!!!! Ride em' Cowboy!!

YeeHaaaaw!!!!!! Ride em’ Cowboy!!

The Democrats have successfully conned the Republican majority in the House – or at least the leadership – into believing they welcome it.

This is an example of counter intuitive Saul Alinsky-style disinformation at its best.

Democrats say they’re raising money fighting impeachment.

They say it will help them in the midterm election.

They say talk of impeaching the first black president smacks of racism.

And the Republican leadership, the Republican elite, the Rockefeller country-club Republicans believe them.

That’s the incredible story of what is happening right now in Washington.

House Speaker John Boehner has taken it off the table. Karl Rove says it’s only Democrats talking about impeachment. Yet polls show at least 57 percent of grassroots Republicans support impeachment.

Why do they support impeachment?

Because Barack Obama is making a mockery of the Constitution and the rule of law.

Let’s just take one of dozens of potential articles of impeachment – the use of the Internal Revenue Service to target political enemies of Obama. Here are some of the salient facts:

Lois Lerner pleaded the Fifth Amendment when subpoenaed to testify before Congress on her role in this scandal. It may be the first time this despicable woman found a part of the Constitution she could get behind. When her emails were subpoenaed, the IRS claimed her hard drive crashed and all of them were destroyed in a remarkable coincidence. Then we were told there were a whole series of computer crashes within the IRS and the hard drives were all shredded, apparently to keep this computer virus from spreading like Ebola throughout the federal government. Then a few random emails were discovered. And what did they show? They showed Lois Lerner, who will be paid by taxpayers she targeted for the rest of her life, had a palpable contempt for conservatives and tea-party people whom she maligned in barnyard terminology, explaining that these citizens represented a bigger threat to society than foreign terrorists.

Yet, Obama says there’s not a smidgeon of a scandal here.

Do I exaggerate? No, I am deliberately understating the facts.

I could add Justice Department stonewalling to the list. I could add excuse-making by IRS officials that rivals in absurdity to the old “my dog ate my homework” childhood story.

Could Richard Nixon have survived such a scandal when the House and Senate were under the control of Democrats?

We know the answer. The Democrats drafted articles of impeachment against Nixon that included the charge of using the IRS to target his political enemies with far less evidence. Nixon took the honorable way out and resigned in disgrace. (By the way, it’s worth noting that Nixon did not actually use the IRS to target political enemies. He only mused about it. But that was enough for people like Hillary Clinton, who helped draft the articles of impeachment.)

Now, let me stipulate that there are dozens and dozens of other impeachable offenses for which Obama should be charged by the House. In the interests of brevity, I will refer you to the book by Aaron Klein and Brenda Elliott called “Impeachable Offenses” for the details, though the potential indictments are growing almost daily.

Let me also point out that when Democrats began probing Nixon’s Watergate scandals, Nixon was at the height of his popularity. Democrats never considered they were dooming their own political fortunes by attempting to impeach a popular president. Nor did they concern themselves with the horror of being left with Gerald Ford as a successor. In fact, Watergate led directly to the election of an unknown Democratic peanut farmer from Georgia in 1976 – something that was unthinkable in 1973.

What Republicans really fear is a repeat of the successful impeachment of Bill Clinton, only the second president in American history to be tried for high crimes and misdemeanors. Well, maybe I should say, almost tried. What happened? Few seem to remember this relatively recent event clearly, while others were too young to recall.

Republicans actually controlled the Senate when Clinton was impeached by the House. The Republican leadership of the Senate determined before any hearings were held that it would be inadvisable politically to remove Clinton from office. Everyone knew Clinton was guilty – Democrats included. But that was beside the point.

You can read all about it in the best book ever written on the subject, “Catching Our Flag,” by James Rogan, one of the House impeachment managers. (You will also be shocked by some of the famous-name Republicans who caved in that historic fight.)

So what are we to take away from this modern history of impeachment fights?

Democrats play hard and play for keeps.

Republicans are afraid of their shadows, even when they are in the political driver’s seat.

I don’t know whether impeachment could be successful if the House Republicans chose that course.

That’s not really the point. The point should be: What is the right thing to do?

If Obama is not impeached for his high crimes and misdemeanors before he leaves office of his own accord, then it is hard to imagine any future president ever being impeached, again. The crimes he has committed against the Constitution are breathtaking and legion, unsurpassed in American history and, hopefully, in America’s future.

In other words, if Obama is not impeached, we should write off this constitutional provision forever.

Read Full Post »

From WND:

‘Economic elites and organized groups have substantial independent impact on policy’

Back in the "day"... that would buy a couple of kilos of Green Nepalese Temple Balls!... Now a days it'll only get you a congressional vote... Isn't inflation a bitch!?

Back in the “day”… that would buy a couple of kilos of Green Nepalese Temple Balls!… Nowadays it’ll only get you a congressional vote… Isn’t inflation a bitch!?

President Lincoln’s declared “government of the people, by the people, for the people” may be in danger of perishing from the earth after all.

A recent study by professors Martin Gilens of Princeton and Benjamin I. Page found that the U.S. now resembles more of an oligarchy than a democratic republic.

“The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence.”

The author of a recent commentary about oligarchy in the 21st century, Matthew Continetti, of the Free Beacon, might even suggest that last phrase be repeated.

“Mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence.”

“What we are in danger of losing because of the ‘extreme inequality in terms of political influence and the production of knowledge and information’ are the classical liberal values of negative freedom, of religious liberty, of equality before the law, of free markets,” he wrote.

“The inequality of income our bipartisan ruling class sanctimoniously condemns is the very tool it uses to shore up the inequalities of power and communication from which it benefits. Affluent, self-righteous, self-seeking, self-possessed, triumphalist, out of touch, hostile to dissent – this is what oligarchy looks like in the 21st century,” he wrote.

The study looked at 1,779 policy issues and found that, “The probability of policy change is nearly the same (around 0.3) whether a tiny minority or a large majority of average citizens favor a proposed policy change. By contrast – again with other actors held constant – a proposed policy change with low support among economically elite Americans (one-out-of-five in favor) is adopted only about 18 percent of the time, while a proposed change with high support (four-out-of-five in favor) is adopted about 45 percent of the time.” (more…)

Read Full Post »

From WND:

Proof Obama is Worse than Carter
Joseph Farah points to BHO’s ‘Operation Vamos’

carter-drag-200px.jpgIn April 1980, Cuba’s Fidel Castro, facing the consequences of his shrinking Marxist economy, decided to let tens of thousands of his citizens, including mental patients, political enemies and criminals, leave his prison island for what would be a six-month period.

Normally, Castro’s police and military would sink boats and rafts of those trying to escape his workers’ paradise. But during the Mariel [boat lift], about 125,000 Cubans were allowed to leave, to brave shark-infested waters and the U.S. Coast Guard.

No matter how you slice it, it was an act of war declared by Castro. And then-President Jimmy Carter protested vehemently. He even relieved the overwhelmed Coast Guard with Marine and Navy deployments.

obama-high-drunkFast forward to spring 2014.

Something very similar is happening right now, but it’s not the result of a foreign enemy of the U.S. dumping tens of thousands of unskilled and unwanted populations. This time, the president of the United States is luring them here. They are encouraged by Barack Obama to risk their lives to come to the U.S. from Central America, crossing Mexico without proper provisions and little more than the clothes on their back – many of them children traveling alone.

The crisis on the U.S. southern border is the Mariel [boat lift] all over again – this time designed and executed by highest officials in the land.

To me this is proof of the long-debated question of who’s a worse president – Jimmy Carter or Barack Obama.

The answer is clearly Obama.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: