Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Global War’

Forty-five years ago this week the world received the honor of another “Palestinian” creation.

Arab Muslims labelled Palestinian savagely tortured and murdered eleven Israeli athletes at the Olympic Village in Munich.

Among other pastimes devised by “Palestinians” that have been emulated by Arab Muslims at large are:

Airplane hijackings

School shootings

Suicide/homicide exploding vest attacks

Knife attacks

Car and truck attacks

If only we would give them everything they want the world could be perfect.

Yasir Arafat, the chic magnet

Read Full Post »

It seems one of the premier Jesuit colleges, Fordham University, is under attack by the SJP.

For the uninitiated, that stands for Shitheads and Jizzbags for Phonystine.

The Phonystinians are livid that Fordham isn’t allowing them the privilege of using the school to spread their lies and hatred.

If you can, proudly wear the Maroon in solidarity with Fordham, buy their athletic wear and state the reason if asked.

www.algemeiner.com/2017/02/03/fordham-university-facing-backlash-for-rejecting-sjp-on-campus/

Read Full Post »

Where is the outrage over the extrajudicial killing of an innocent teenager in Columbus, Ohio?

Why aren’t his actions being justified as the Ohio colonists are occupying native lands?

This is what happens when the exact same incident occurs in Israel when the victims are Jews and the attacking animal happens to be “Palestinian”.

Read Full Post »

This most recent selection is Andrew Scott Cooper’s The Fall of Heaven.

It’s all about the Islamist take down of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in 1979.

indexAn informative read for those not alive at the time and for those who can relive those days through a prism not available then.

The shah’s downfall and replacement with a radical, fundamentalist, Islamist theocracy was the first domino to fall in the ongoing clash of cultures knocking into dominoes around us now.

The three takeaways are in no articular order are;

  1. The Shah, according to Cooper was very reluctant to crack down harshly on the nascent uprising when it could have been nipped in the bud before the Islamists took it over. This may have sugar-coated the Shah’s role as I remember meeting Iranian refugees in the late 70s who fled from Savak, the Shah’s secret police.
  2. The Americas, i.e. the Carter Administration and ambassador Sullivan were inept, incompetent, incapable and ignorant when it came to understanding Persian culture, the events unfolding and what America’s interests actually were.
  3. The duplicity and deception on the part of  Khomeini and his ilk in achieving their goal. The organizational methods, strategies and tactics were similar to what is being used today to foment Islamic supremacy worldwide.

The big lesson here is that our leaders are not immune from stupidity and can be easily outmaneuvered by believing those with a proven track record of untrustworthy behavior.

Mr. Trump please read this book.

Read Full Post »

The changing linguistic landscape has given new meaning to some very familiar terms, thanks in no small part to the media and academia.

For example:

  • Mentally disturbed individual = Muslim terrorist
  • Lone wolf = Muslim terrorist who was aided by friends, family and community.
  • Islamophobia = The heightened mental state of being aware of Muslim terrorists.
  • Anti-Zionist = Classic Jew hating Nazi bigot.

Read Full Post »

Psst, Ray, You There? ray-the_dope_hanania

You see this?

Holy shit Ray, is this fucked up or what?

Columnist Says Israel ‘Last Hope’ for Arab Christians Before Total Annihilation

Read Full Post »

If young European women and girls, even as young as ten years old,  bear the burden of rape and sexual assault as a direct result of their  provocative dress and actions;

And Jews are responsible for Antisemitism in thought and deed by simply being Jewish;

Then just maybe…….

“Islamophobia” can justifiably be blamed on Muslims.

Stop being so Islamic and “Islamophobia” will go away.

What’s good for the toilet is good for the feces floating in it.

Read Full Post »

In the interests of objectivity and what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, let’s ponder the following concept.

Why is it that one group of Arab Muslims can fabricate a false history as a distinctive ethnography, claim a nation-state based on this false premise, and garner support throughout the world while another group of Arab Muslims a few hundred miles away do the same thing albeit with more historic validity and the world comes down on them.

ISIS, denying the presence of international borders seeking the creation of their own nation or Caliphate is no different from the Arabs of Israel, Judea and Samaria.

They both are despotic abusers of their own subjects, follow the precepts of the Koran, use terror tactics on any opposition and like to hump goats.

Why are Palestinians any more entitled than the rapidly gestating ISISTAN?

At least there is more historic accuracy of a Caliphate that existed for hundreds of years than the myth of a distinct nation made of “Palestinian” Muslims that never existed and was never even thought about until 1967.

Read Full Post »

Gotcha again, you goat-fucking dirt-bag secret homos

Our findings now confirm that alongside life insurance or used car salesmen, lawyers, carnie barkers and pimps, we can now add journalists to those professions requiring the purveyance of slimy, sleazy slugs.

Matti Friedman explains it all in a speech he gave in London this week:

One night several years ago, I came out of Bethlehem after a reporting assignment and crossed through the Israeli military checkpoint between that city and its neighbor, Jerusalem, where I live. With me were perhaps a dozen Palestinian men, mostly in their thirties – my age. No soldiers were visible at the entrance to the checkpoint, a precaution against suicide bombers. We saw only steel and concrete. I followed the other men through a metal detector into a stark corridor and followed instructions barked from a loudspeaker – Remove your belt! Lift up your shirt! The voice belonged to a soldier watching us on a closed-circuit camera. Exiting the checkpoint, adjusting my belt and clothing with the others, I felt like a being less than entirely human and understood, not for the first time, how a feeling like that would provoke someone to violence.

Consumers of news will recognize this scene as belonging to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, which keeps the 2.5 million Palestinians in that territory under military rule, and has since 1967. The facts of this situation aren’t much in question. This should be an issue of concern to Israelis, whose democracy, military, and society are corroded by the inequality in the West Bank. This, too, isn’t much in question.

The question we must ask, as observers of the world, is why this conflict has come over time to draw more attention than any other, and why it is presented as it is. How have the doings in a country that constitutes 0.01 percent of the world’s surface become the

focus of angst, loathing, and condemnation more than any other? We must ask how Israelis and Palestinians have become the stylized symbol of conflict, of strong and weak, the parallel bars upon which the intellectual Olympians of the West perform their tricks – not Turks and Kurds, not Han Chinese and Tibetans, not British soldiers and Iraqi Muslims, not Iraqi Muslims and Iraqi Christians, not Saudi sheikhs and Saudi women, not Indians and Kashmiris, not drug cartel thugs and Mexican villagers. Questioning why this is the case is in no way an attempt to evade or obscure reality, which is why I opened with the checkpoint leading from Bethlehem. On the contrary – anyone seeking a full understanding of reality can’t avoid this question. My experiences as a journalist provide part of the answer, and also raise pressing questions that go beyond the practice of journalism.

I have been writing from and about Israel for most of the past 20 years, since I moved there from Toronto at age 17. During the five and a half years I spent as part of the international press corps as a reporter for the American news agency The Associated Press, between 2006 and 2011, I gradually began to be aware of certain malfunctions in the coverage of the Israel story – recurring omissions, recurring inflations, decisions made according to considerations that were not journalistic but political, all in the context of a story staffed and reported more than any other international story on earth. When I worked in the AP’s Jerusalem bureau, the Israel story was covered by more AP news staff than China, or India, or all of the fifty-odd countries of sub-Saharan Africa combined. This is representative of the industry as a whole.

In early 2009, to give one fairly routine example of an editorial decision of the kind I mean, I was instructed by my superiors to report a second-hand story taken from an Israeli newspaper about offensive T-shirts supposedly worn by Israeli soldiers. We had no confirmation of our own of the story’s veracity, and one doesn’t see much coverage of things US Marines or British infantrymen have tattooed on their chests or arms. And yet T-shirts worn by Israeli soldiers were newsworthy in the eyes of one of the world’s most powerful news organizations. This was because we sought to hint or say outright that Israeli soldiers were war criminals, and every detail supporting that portrayal was to be seized upon. Much of the international press corps covered the T-shirt story. At around the same time, several Israeli soldiers were quoted anonymously in a school newsletter speaking of abuses they had supposedly witnessed while fighting in Gaza; we wrote no fewer than three separate stories about this, although the use of sources whose identity isn’t known to reporters is banned for good reason by the AP’s own in-house rules. This story, too, was very much one that we wanted to tell. By the time the soldiers came forward to say they hadn’t actually witnessed the events they supposedly described, and were trying to make a point to young students about the horrors and moral challenges of warfare, it was, of course, too late.

Also in those same months, in early 2009, two reporters in our bureau obtained details of a peace offer made by the Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, to the Palestinians several months before, and deemed by the Palestinians to be insufficient. The offer proposed a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza with a capital in a shared Jerusalem. This should have been one of the year’s biggest stories. But an Israeli peace offer and its rejection by the Palestinians didn’t suit OUR story. The bureau chief ordered both reporters to ignore the Olmert offer, and they did, despite a furious protest from one of them, who later termed this decision “the biggest fiasco I’ve seen in 50 years of journalism.” But it was very much in keeping not only with the practice at the AP, but in the press corps in general. Soldiers’ vile t-shirts were worth a story. Anonymous and unverifiable testimonies of abuses were worth three. A peace proposal from the Israeli prime minister to the Palestinian president was not to be reported at all.

Read Full Post »

September 1, 1939, seventy-five years ago today began what is now referred to as World War II, or as the Russians call it, The Great Patriotic War.

It was the world-wide effort to defeat Nazism.

We thought victory was achieved with Hitler’s suicide and the subsequent unconditional surrender of Germany followed by Imperial Japan.

The last vestige of Nazi Germany that was never called to task has continued to carry Hitler’s torch and is now resurgent like never before.

Hitler’s Islamist, Muslim Brotherhood ally escaped defeat and the punishment it deserved, and now is conducting war against the very core of western civilization.

If Rosie the riveter were alive today she would drop the rivet gun and pick up an M-16.

The fight against Nazism is not over yet. Stamp out Muslim extremism.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: