Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Constitution’

Obama’s narcissistic, arrogant, hubristic, sociopathic, egotistical, inexperienced personality cannot accept the fact that he alone poisoned the mid-term elections for the Dems.

His solution? More treachery.

He’s having a huge hissy fit, threatening to circumvent Congress and write laws himself.

He’s also working overtime to tear this country apart as quickly as possible.

Judging from his behavior, one would believe him to be a spoiled 2-year-old crybaby. 

Waaah!

Crybabies need oral pacifiers. I’ve got one for him…

illegal-obama

I guess they didn’t teach this ‘law’ stuff in Kenya at the Muslim grade school Obama attended.

Read Full Post »

Click on graphic to enlarge.
Boombox-5

Read Full Post »

Constitution? What Constitution? Second Amendment? Who cares?

From redflagnews.com:

OUTRAGEOUS: Veterans receiving letters prohibiting the purchase, possession, receipt, or transport of a firearm/ammunition…

Obammy_Silhouette

How would you feel if you received a letter from the U.S. Government informing you that because of a physical or mental condition that the government says you have it is proposing to rule that you are incompetent to handle your own financial affairs? Suppose that letter also stated that the government is going to appoint a stranger to handle your affairs for you at your expense? That would certainly be scary enough but it gets worse. (more…)

Read Full Post »

“Barack Obama’s increasingly grandiose claims for presidential power are inversely proportional to his shriveling presidency.” — George Will

From Newsmax:

George Will: Obama Ignores Law, Like Nixon

Criminal Prez

Criminal in Chief Barry Soetoro

Barack Obama’s increasingly grandiose claims for presidential power are inversely proportional to his shriveling presidency.

Desperation fuels arrogance as, barely 200 days into the 1,462 days of his second term, his pantry of excuses for failure is bare, his domestic agenda is nonexistent and his foreign policy of empty rhetorical deadlines and redlines is floundering. And at last week’s news conference he offered inconvenience as a justification for illegality.

Explaining his decision to unilaterally rewrite the Affordable Care Act, he said: “I didn’t simply choose to” ignore the statutory requirement for beginning in 2014 the employer mandate to provide employees with healthcare. No, “this was in consultation with businesses.”

He continued: “In a normal political environment, it would have been easier for me to simply call up the speaker and say, you know what, this is a tweak that doesn’t go to the essence of the law . . . it looks like there may be some better ways to do this, let’s make a technical change to the law. That would be the normal thing that I would prefer to do. But we’re not in a normal atmosphere around here when it comes to Obamacare. We did have the executive authority to do so, and we did so.”

Serving as props in the scripted charade of White House news conferences, journalists did not ask the pertinent question: “Where does the Constitution confer upon presidents the ‘executive authority’ to ignore the separation of powers by revising laws?” The question could have elicited an Obama rarity: Brevity. Because there is no such authority. (more…)

Read Full Post »

Re-posted from the syndicated column by on July 4, 2013  in Daily Rant, Politics:

– – –

THE FOLLOWING IS MY SYNDICATED COLUMN THAT WAS PUBLISHED July 4, 2006. OBVIOUSLY NOT ALL OF THE PEOPLE NAMED THEN ARE LIVING AND/OR IN OFFICE TODAY BUT THE NAMES OF THE ELECTED POLITICIANS ARE INTERCHANGEABLE WHEN IT COMES TO THEIR NOT HAVING OUR BEST INTEREST IN MIND AND THEIR LEVEL OF CORRUPTION. AS I SAID, CHANGE THE NAMES I REFERENCED THEN WITH THOSE IN OFFICE TODAY AND THIS PIECE IS EVEN MORE PRESCIENT THAN WHEN FIRST PENNED SEVEN YEARS AGO.
***************************

John Kerry’s idea of freedom may be marrying uber-wealthy heiresses. Ted Kennedy’s idea of same has been to live off his gangster father’s bootlegging money. Howard Dean, D-Vt., Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., view freedom as bullying and intimidating any Democrat congressman who gets out of line (especially if he is black) and bashing the president at every opportunity. (more…)

Read Full Post »

The reason we have a Constitution is to protect us from a president like Barack “I didn’t know about it” Obama and an attorney general like Eric “I don’t know” Holder.

Clearly, both are criminals and corrupt to the bone.

obama-burns-constitution

EricHolderLookingStupid

Read Full Post »

I hope the feds never attempt to take our firearms away, but if they do, the Civil War will pale in comparison to the can of worms these Washington lawbreakers would open.

Push has just about come to shove and we’re “FED” up.

The Second Amendment to our Constitution is on our side and this right will not be infringed.

We hold the right to defend ourselves against government tyranny, so the minute the feds attempt an arms grab, we are lawfully enabled to use lethal force against them.

And we will.

– – – – – – – –

The following is a well written blog post that puts this entire matter into perspective for all parties involved in the gun rights issue.

If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?

by Dean Garrison

gunsI feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is a frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this, however, is simply because I don’t think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. I blame traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and I carry the responsibility of all small independent bloggers to tell the truth. So my focus today is to lay out your constitutional rights as an American, and let you decide what to do with those rights.

About a month ago I let the “democracy” word slip in a discussion with a fellow blogger. I know better. Americans have been conditioned to use this term. It’s not an accurate term and it never has been a correct term to describe our form of government. The truth is that the United States of America is a constitutional republic. This is similar to a democracy because our representatives are selected by democratic elections, but ultimately our representatives are required to work within the framework of our constitution. In other words, even if 90% of Americans want something that goes against our founding principles, they have no right to call for a violation of constitutional rights.

If you are religious you might choose to think of it this way… Say that members of your congregation decide that mass fornication is a good thing. Do they have the right to change the teachings of your God? The truth is the truth. It doesn’t matter how many people try to stray from it. Did I just compare our founders to God? In a way I did, but please note that I am not trying to insult anyone. For the purpose of the American Government our constitution and founders who wrote it are much like God is to believers. It is the law. It is indisputable.

Our founders did not want a “democracy” for they feared a true democracy was just as dangerous as a monarchy. The founders were highly educated people who were experienced in defending themselves against tyranny. They understood that the constitution could protect the people by limiting the power of anyone to work outside of it much better than a pure system of popularity. A system of checks and balances was set up to help limit corruption of government and also the potential for an “immoral majority” developing within the American People. We have forgotten in this country that we are ultimately ruled by a constitution. (more…)

Read Full Post »

“The opening line of the Constitution contains a serious typographical error: ‘We the People’ should read ‘We the States.’ As President Ronald Reagan reminded us in his first inaugural address, the states created the federal government and not the other way around.”

And the states created a monster we must now beat down!

Napolitano: Guns and the Government

Commentary by By Andrew P. (Judge) Napolitano

napolitanoIf you have listened to President Obama and Vice President Biden talk about guns in the past month, you have heard them express a decided commitment to use the powers of the federal government to maintain safety in the United States. You also have heard congressional voices from politicians in both parties condemning violence and promising to do something about it. This sounds very caring and inside the wheelhouse of what we hire and pay the federal government to do.

But it is clearly unconstitutional. (more…)

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: