Posts Tagged ‘Bill O’Reilly’

View our first post on the Pamela Geller “Draw Mohammad” contest: TMQ2 SALUTES…


Shut Pam Geller Up, or We Will All Die

By Ben Shapiro | 13 May 2015

Last week, Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly announced that Pamela Geller, the woman who sponsored a draw Muhammad event in Texas, threatened America’s national security. Geller, said O’Reilly, “spurred a violent attack.” He continued, “Insulting the entire Muslim world is stupid. … It does not advance the cause of liberty or get us any closer to defeating the savage jihad.” On the same network, Juan Williams stated that Geller “engaged in gratuitous offensive behavior that led to the deaths of two people.” The New York Times editorialized that Geller “achieved her provocative goal” with her “exercise in bigotry and hatred posing as a blow for freedom.”

Geller, the narrative goes, should never have encouraged people to draw Muhammad because it was “provocative.” To which the answer should be: So what? Women attending school in Afghanistan “provokes” radical Muslims into throwing acid on their faces, but that does not mean that women should not go to school in Afghanistan or be condemned for doing so.

Geller, the narrative goes, made Americans less safe by provoking radical Muslims, as though Muslims have no responsibility to act like decent human beings — as though, faced with the prospect of a cartoon of their prophet, Muslims have no choice but to grab guns and go a-huntin’. But that’s nonsense. What truly spurs radical Muslims into violence is the well-evidenced belief that if they kill enough Muhammad cartoonists, soon people will stop drawing cartoons of Muhammad.

Geller, the narrative goes, was “Islamophobic” in her call for drawings of Muhammad; unlike Charlie Hebdo, Geller was not an equal opportunity offender of all religions, and therefore showed particular animus toward Islam. But failure to equally attack all religions does not make satire of one religion illegitimate — were that the case, The New York Times would have to answer why drawing Muhammad presents deep problems, but running simultaneous ads for the slanderous “Book of Mormon” musical is hunky-dory.

So, why the assault on Geller? The answer is simple: Too many Westerns have bought into the notion that personal responsibility can be jettisoned in favor of judgments about identity. Geller is the problem, in this view, because she is an upper-class Jewish woman from New York City; her rivals are poor Muslims from Phoenix. They are, by the nature of their identities, members of the victim class. She is, by contrast, a member of the victimizing class. Nothing either party can do can change their status in this equation. Therefore, according to Doonesbury cartoonist Garry Trudeau, even the Muslims who shot up Charlie Hebdo in France were justified: “Ridiculing the non-privileged is almost never funny — it’s just mean. … By attacking a powerless, disenfranchised minority with crude, vulgar drawings closer to graffiti than cartoons, Charlie wandered into the realm of hate speech.”

How do proponents of this victim/victimizer identity dichotomy determine who falls into which category? They simply look at the socioeconomic status of those involved and make a determination of who is worse off. Thus, black Baltimore rioters were not people acting without any sense of values, but rather victims provoked by injustice from a non-existent white power structure in Baltimore. Before a conflict has even begun, we know who deserves our sympathy.

That calculus leads to more death, more destruction, more chaos. That death, destruction and chaos cannot be laid at the feet of Pamela Geller, but those who continue to perpetuate a narrative in which people who commit evil acts are victims, and those who are their victims are their provocateurs.

Ben Shapiro, 31, is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, a radio host on KTTH 770 Seattle and KRLA 870 Los Angeles, editor-in-chief of TruthRevolt.org, and Senior editor-at-large of Breitbart News. He is The New York Times best-selling author of “Bullies.” His latest book, “The People vs. Barack Obama: The Criminal Case Against the Obama Administration,” will be released on June 10. He lives with his wife and daughter in Los Angeles. To find out more about Ben Shapiro and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at http://www.creators.com.

Read Full Post »

Leon “No Axe To Grind” Panetta was laughable in is jokester role to Bill “Phoney-Baloney” O’Reilly as his straight man.

panetta-o'reillyLeon threw Obama under the bus in this interview promoting his book that throws Obama of all places under the self-same bus.

I deplore this exercise in loyalty as detritus not for any pity for Obama who deserves to be thrown under something more substantial than a bus, but for the nauseating and transparent way that Pancetta, that’s right, pancetta (look it up) is angling for a spot in what he believes will be the next Clinton regime.

He’s distancing himself from an administration he was part and parcel to faster than a Kenyan at the starting line of the New York City Marathon.

And shame on you O’Reilly for not asking the most obvious question.

The one that matters most in the context of this charade and the one to which Pancetta is most accountable.

The question unasked that inquiring minds want answered is this.

Leon, if you feel so strongly about the deficiency and miscarriage of executive power over the last five years, why the fuck didn’t you say something then, you blow-hard, self-serving, vacuous piece of shit?

And who the fuck paid O’Reilly off to keep him from asking it?

Read Full Post »


I wrote this post the night before last, BILL O’REILLY KNOWS IT ALL, and watched Bill O’Reilly’s show last night.

One of his reader emails asked him, “Bill, you say Obama was not born in Kenya and he’s not Muslim. Where’s your proof?”

Sound familiar?

Bill has stated many times that Obama isn’t Muslim and wasn’t born in Kenya without providing any real proof whatsoever.

Bill answered in a bait and switch sort of way.

Instead of backing up his statement, Bill offered the retort that it was this person’s responsibility to provide proof even though he made no statement about Obama.

He simply asked Bill to prove his statement.

Most peeps probably didn’t catch this twist.

Bill garnished his retort by stating he had already checked Obama’s birth records in Hawaii and they were authentic, but made no mention of the ‘Muslim’ question.

Sure, Bill, we believe you.

What was it, another Watter’s World covert mission?

So, either Bill is a document expert, or he still owes us proof based on his own rules.

Do we now have to prove Bills points for him? Is this burden now on our shoulders?

As I wrote before, Catholic guilt and clogged suprarenal glands are crippling the real Bill.

I provided a video link where Obama himself admits to being Muslim.

I guess Bill didn’t see that one even thought he aired it on his show about 5 years ago.

So, I’m back to my original essay about Bill and Obama posted in February of 2013:


I still love ya, Bill. I’m just sayin’…

Read Full Post »

BillOReillyBill O’Reilly says Obama is not a Muslim and wasn’t born in Kenya, but offers no proof on these points, yet he demands proof on all other points made by anyone on The Factor.

He says the radio hosts get it right and those of us who maintain that Obama is Muslim and was born in Kenya are fanatics.

How does he know?

Where’s the proof, proof boy?

The fact is, blogs get it right, the radio and TV boys steal from us.

That’s a fact, Jack.

Bill presumes to speak for the military at times, like how Obama should have bombed the ISIS onslaught in Iraq, yet he has never served in the military and knows little about it.

Ask any veteran if someone who has never served in the military could understand how it really is.

And if one wants to ask questions about national defense, why not forget the generals and politicians and ask those who have to do the actual fighting?

I like Bill, but he certainly does not speak for this old, salty veteran.

Bill O’Reilly is a Catholic boy who doesn’t have the balls to come out and tell us what he really thinks.

That Catholic guilt thing is still clogging up his suprarenal glands.

He tells us what he must in order to keep his ratings up. Period.

Hell, I might do the same thing if I were Catholic and trying to keep high ratings, but this doesn’t excuse Bill.

He seems to believe he has the answers to all the problems in society.

Who died and made him the top knot?

Like I said, his suprarenal glands are clogged.

Blogs are the cutting edge.

Radio and TV personalities are parrots.

Bill is a parrot.

Remember that, Bill.

Long live the blogs and the cutting-edge bloggers!

– – –

By the way, Bill, the word “resources” is not pronounced “reZources”.

And there is no such word in the English language as “foward”.

There are only two choices, “forward” and “foreword”.

Look ’em up, big guy.

Next thing we know, you’ll be telling us to vote for Koskinen from the IRS as the next prez.

Thank God you have Dennis Miller around to keep you straight.

– – –

Also read:

Read Full Post »


TMQ2 Contributor’s Comment:  It is the opinion of this contributor that Sharyl Attkisson must surely wear her balls on her chest… that’s the only way she could possibly keep them from clanging when she walks! Touché to you my dear Sharyl!! Fuckin’ A… You Go girl!!

An editorial from those good people at Hot Air.

First Liz Wahl quits RT over Crimea, now this. It’s been a bad week for state TV.

Coincidentally, Alisyn Camerota announced today that she’s leaving Fox News after 16 years, leaving a vacancy in the 1 p.m. slot. (Seriously, though, I think this is a coincidence.)

Attkisson, who has been with CBS News for two decades, had grown frustrated with what she saw as the network’s liberal bias, an outsized influence by the network’s corporate partners and a lack of dedication to investigative reporting, several sources said. She increasingly felt like her work was no longer supported and that it was a struggle to get her packages on television.

At the same time, Attkisson’s own reporting on the Obama administration, which some staffers characterized as agenda-driven, had led network executives to doubt the impartiality of her reporting. She is currently at work on a book — tentatively titled “Stonewalled: One Reporter’s Fight for Truth in Obama’s Washington” — which addresses the challenges of reporting critically on the Obama administration…

But Attkisson had become a polarizing figure at the network, sources there said. While some championed her relentless dedication to investigations — ranging from defective Firestone Tires to the Fast and Furious gunwalking scandal — others saw evidence of a political agenda, particularly against President Obama. (The bulk of Attkisson’s work since 2009 has focused on the failures or perceived failures of the Obama administration, including the administration’s failed green energy investments and the attack in Benghazi, though she has reported on several Republican failures as well.)


Read Full Post »

Remember, you heard it here first.

Brace yourselves Bill O’Reilly fans because there is no longer any question—it’s official.

Last evening’s The O’Reilly Factor was a good example of how Bill has become Obama’s latest apologist. Another was the Obama-O’Reilly spit-swapping session preceding Super Bowl XLVIII.

Rather than revisiting this epiphany and spinning it into a spellbinding narrative, I’ll just offer up these few sound bites and suggest that you watch The O’Reilly Factor on any given weeknight in order to judge for yourselves.

Bill disqualifies statements about Obama’s sabotage of our country by claiming there is no evidence. If wars were fought on this premiss, they would always be lost.  If he were at Pearl Harbor during the Japanese attack of 7 December 1941, as hundreds of warplanes were inbound, would he say there is no proof the Japs were about to unleash Holy hell on our naval base? He is either a fool or busy fooling his demographic for some covert reason. I have serious doubts about it being the latter.

Bill often speaks of his football days. If I were to guess which position he played, I’d have to go with defensive lineman because he knows nothing about offense.

Which part of Obama is a traitor, a racist, is dismantling our country piece by piece, is clearly our enemy, and works with the Muslim Brotherhood does Bill not understand?

This cannot be for lack of evidence because there is a plethora of it. Bill is simply turning a blind eye to Obama’s sinister plans and actions, “Because there is no proof.”

Fair and balanced? In your dreams, Bill.

Pithy? Sure, like carving a Christmas turkey with a wet sponge.

Bill’s moneymaker now appears to be super-glued to Obama’s buttocks—metaphorically speaking.


Graphic by Rodney Pike – Humorous Illustrator

Bill brown noses Obama often. When discussing Obama, Bill attempts to control, minimize, school, and verbally tongue lash even his own FOX News cohorts like Mary Katharine Ham and Monica Crowley when they speak the truth. 

He has morphed into a hubris-filled bully balloon ready for a Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.

The question is why? What’s in it for O’Reilly? Could Barry and Bill have a future book in the works which could be aptly entitled Drilling O’Reilly?

I know what a RINO is, and I know what my definition of “is” is, but what label would one use to describe a registered Independent in name only like Bill, an IINO?

O’Reilly appears to have reached his zenith and is now descending the leeward side of his career. Playing tonsil hockey with Obama is a sure sign he has crossed over. He has become Walter Cronkite II.

Here’s your TMQ2 Factor word for the day, Bill: Bloviate.

Read Full Post »

I’ve been a long-time O’Reilly fan, but he lost me on this one.

Bill believes Stanislav Shmulevich should face felony hate crimes charges. While we’re busy flushing Qur’ans, let’s also flush Bill O’Reilly. His blinders are closing in and his fans are running off.

View all TMQ2 posts on flushing the Qur’an.

Read Full Post »

This video was too stupid to leave here, so we deleted it.

Read Full Post »

Bill nails it here…

The Demise of Ward Churchill

by Bill O’Reilly

Well, it took two and a half years, but the University of Colorado finally axed the nutty professor. Ward Churchill has been fired for academic misconduct, including plagiarism. Despite those assertions, this was really about an out-of-control teacher earning nearly $100,000 a year saying things so foolish that no institute of learning could support them. (more…)

Read Full Post »


O’Reilly vs. Howard Wolfson on Daily Kos

Wolfson is the main reason Hillary will never, I repeat, never become the president. If this is his secret plan, then it’s working. If not, then Howie baby needs to wake up!

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: