Posts Tagged ‘Ann Coulter’

August 9, 2017

The current issue of Newsweek (yes, it’s still in business!) has a picture of President Trump sitting in a recliner, with snacks and an iPad in his lap, pointing his TV remote at the viewer, blazoned with the headline, “Lazy Boy.”

Liberals only wish.

Last week, the president joined Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and David Perdue (R-Ga.) to announce legislation that would make seminal changes to our immigration laws for the first time in more than half a century, profoundly affecting the entire country.

The media have chosen not to cover the RAISE Act (Reforming American Immigration for Strong Employment). This bill is their worst nightmare.

Instead of admitting immigrants on the basis of often specious “family” ties, the bill would finally allow us to choose the immigrants we want, based on merit, with points granted for skills, English proficiency, advanced degrees, actual job offers and so on.

Most Americans have no idea that we have zero say about the vast majority of immigrants pouring into our country. Two-thirds of all legal immigrants get in not because we want them — or even because Mark Zuckerberg wants them — but under idiotic “family reunification” laws.

The most important provision of the RAISE Act would define “family” the way most Americans think of it: your spouse and minor children.

Unfortunately, that’s not how the Third World thinks of “family.” In tribal societies, “family” means the whole extended clan — adult siblings, elderly parents and brothers-in-law, plus all their adult siblings and elderly parents, and so on, ad infinitum. (more…)

Read Full Post »

17 May 2017Ann is a major babe with a major brain...GO ANN!

Every time I try to be mad at Trump, the media reel me back in by launching some ridiculous, unprovoked attack. This time, it’s the fake news story about Trump “leaking” classified information to the Russkies.

The president can’t “leak” classified information: It’s his to declassify.

The big secret Trump allegedly revealed is that Muslims might try to blow up a plane with laptops. I already knew that. I read it in The New York Times.

The New York Times, March 22, 2017:

Devices Banned on Some Planes Over ISIS Fears

“Intelligence showing that the Islamic State is developing a bomb hidden in portable electronics spurred the United States and Britain on Tuesday to bar passengers from airports in a total of 10 Muslim-majority countries from carrying laptop computers … two senior American counterterrorism officials said. …”

This totally secret, Deep Throat-level information has been widely published in thousands of news outlets throughout the civilized world. There was yet another round of stories last week with the update that the U.S. is considering a laptop ban on flights from Europe as well.

Hey, you know what might make more sense than banning laptops? How about banning Muslims?

Bear with me here, I’m still working out the details, but I’m almost certain a federal judge in Hawaii can’t block a president’s temporary ban on Muslim immigration just because he’s testy with Trump over some campaign statements.

As Northwestern law professor Eugene Kontorovich explained in The Washington Post, courts have never examined a politician’s campaign statements for improper motive, because 1) campaigns are not part of the deliberative process; and 2) to start doing so would open the door to “examinations of the entire lives of political officials whose motives may be relevant to legal questions.

Nonetheless, Kontorovich says, that is the legal argument being advanced against Trump’s travel ban: “Trump is a bigot, and thus his winning presidential campaign in fact impeaches him from exercising key constitutional and statutory powers, such as administering the immigration laws.”

To preserve their judicial coup, this Monday, the 9th Circuit sent out the geriatric ward to hear an appeal of the Hawaii judge’s absurd ruling. At their ages, there’s a good chance the judges will be dead by the time the Supreme Court overturns them.

Arguing against Trump’s exercise of his constitutional and statutory powers was first-generation American, Neal Katyal. (There are plenty of 10th-generation America-haters. You couldn’t get one of them to argue that we should end our country through mass immigration?) (more…)

Read Full Post »

Many moons ago Lance regaled us with tales of derring-do, specifically about how he fucked Ann Coulter in the ass real hard.

I think Ann needs some proper sense properly shagged up her corn hole as soon as possible.

The Republican debates loosened her tongue to disgorge anti-Semitic rantings when it should have been sucking hard on some hard Jewish dicks.

I admit I used to be a fan of hers but now all I can offer her is an official TMQ2 invitation to. . .



Read Full Post »

From WND:

Ann Coulter uncorked: ‘Are you people awake?’
Lightning rod unleashes on what’s wrong with right


WASHINGTON — The left loves to hate political dynamo Ann Coulter, and many on the right have found themselves upset with her, too.

The criticism from conservatives began in 2010 when Coulter addressed an event titled “HOMOCON” sponsored by the homosexual Republican group GOProud that promotes same-sex marriage and military service for open homosexuals. A year later, she joined the advisory board of GOProud.

Then came her call for Gov. Chris Christie, R-N.J., to run for president in 2012.

And anger from the right flared yet again over her support of Republican presidential nominee, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

Some conservatives found both of those Republicans too liberal. Coulter retracted her support for Christie but has steadfastly defended Romney.


A year ago, Coulter said, “My flirtation with Christie was like running off with a biker. He was new and exciting — and made conservatives feel alive. But I came back to the responsible choice. Romney is the absolute best man to run against a dirty street fighter like Obama.” (more…)

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »


James Holmes, Accused Aurora, Colorado Shooter

Seung-Hui Cho, who committed the Virginia Tech massacre in 2007, had been diagnosed with severe anxiety disorder as a child and placed under treatment.

But Virginia Tech was prohibited from being told about Cho’s mental health problems because of federal privacy laws.

At college, Cho engaged in behavior even more bizarre than the average college student. He stalked three women and, at one point, went totally silent, refusing to speak even to his roommates. He was involuntarily committed to a mental institution for one night and then unaccountably unleashed on the public, whereupon he proceeded to engage in the deadliest mass shooting by an individual in U.S. history.

The 2011 Tucson, Ariz., shopping mall shooter, Jared Loughner, was so obviously disturbed that if he’d stayed in Pima Community College long enough to make the yearbook, he would have been named “Most Likely to Commit Mass Murder.”

After Loughner got a tattoo, the artist, Carl Grace, remarked: “That’s a weird dude. That’s a Columbine candidate.” (more…)

Read Full Post »


Let it not be said that I particularly dislike Mr. Michael Savage. Or for that matter, let it not be said that I particularly dislike any of the plethora of other supposedly conservative pundits such as Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, Dennis Miller or Ann Coulter just to name a few. Additionally, not only is it not a factual statement to say that I especially dislike any of the aforementioned individuals personally. Neither is it a factual statement to say that I dislike our preeminent, supposedly conservative news source, Fox News, as a whole.

Even though I have recently issued a well deserved “Fuck You!” to all of them collectively by means of the well-known single-fingered salute that was proffered in a previous article, it was certainly not my intention to signify any personal dislike towards them individually or collectively.

“Then what is it, Marshal?” might be a good question. (more…)

Read Full Post »

Tearing Down the White Man

When Ann Coulter wrote in an article and stated during a TV interview that Obama is not a Muslim, I wondered how she arrived at this conclusion.

Was it his voluntary name change from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama, II, which was done neither legally nor officially? Was it his close relationships with radical Muslims and Islamofascist groups like The Muslim Brotherhood? Was it his contempt for Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu? Was it his curtsy before the Saudi king? Was it his acknowledgement that he is a Muslim? Or, was it all of these things and more of the same?

Obama the Muslim Jihadist![Note to Ann Coulter: You might want to flush out your headgear, my dear. I’ve loved your writings and have followed you for years, but you lost me on this one.]

From Obama’s book, Audacity of Hope:

“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

It is common knowledge that Islam’s sharia law is integrated into and within the religion, thereby making it seemingly impossible to be a secular or cultural Muslim alone, sans the religion. I agree with Ann when she states that Obama is an atheist. But when applying Islam to Obama, it is accurate to say that he is a secular Muslim. He is more akin to Louis Farrakhan‘s Nation of Islam members than he is to garden variety Muslims. When needed, he has applied Islam as a tool, an outlet for his “hate whitey” mindset, just as he did in the quote above. The more I read it, the more it sounds like a loosely veiled threat. Does his behavior not indicate that he is already standing with the Muslims?

From Obama’s book, Dreams from My Father:

Dickhead, father of Dickhead

Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. ‘the black man, son of Africa.’

“I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself: the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.” 

Image is one thing, actions are quite another. And Obama is no Martin or Malcolm, DuBois or Mandela. He is much more dangerous. But he will eventually fail because he is deeply flawed and has limited intellect — let’s call it low cranium capacity.

In Obama’s writings, he leaves it to us to derive his true meaning when he writes of emulating his father’s image, “the black man”. We are left to read between the lines in order to construct our theories and conclusions about him. Then we must compare our theories to his actions for validation. Only then can one understand who Obama really is and how he thinks.

His intentional lack of directness could be labeled a shrewd method to avoid exposing his true psyche. However, it is more likely an indication of deep-seated fears or cowardice. He leads this country in a passive aggressive manor because he himself has a passive aggressive personality coupled with a splash of cognitive dissonance, both of which are rooted in his dilemma of being comprised of mixed races. He even writes using the passive voice.

Passive aggression should not be confused with passive resistance, the Marxist philosophy of a rational response. Passive aggression is irrational and hints at an underlying personality disorder. Obama appears sneaky, dishonest, arrogant, full of false pride, egotistical, narcissistic, hateful, racist, corrupt, and attempts to quell his fear of the world by working to control it. All the while, we get a sensation that somebody must be behind him pulling the strings. How could this man be doing the things he does without somebody propping him up? He came out of nowhere and now he’s the POTUS and looking at a possible second term.

I mentioned that he is corrupt. He is a classic example of how absolute power corrupts absolutely. Our system of government was designed by our forefathers with the specific intention of preventing scenarios like this from happening, keeping the power spread out and subject to scrutiny, thereby preventing executive branch tyrants from usurping the remaining two branches of government, the judicial and the legislative. But our system now appears broken because our POTUS completely disregards and ignores the framework of our constitution and attempts to rein in all the power for himself and his criminal regime. The way he sees it, if he destroys our American way of life, realigns this country into his image of what he wants (needs) it to be, he won’t fear it any longer. This while concurrently striking back with quiet vengeance and simmering anger at his arch enemy—the white man. This clearly seems to be his underlying motivation. Does it strike you as rational behavior?

More from Dreams from My Father:

“I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites… I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race… There was something about her that made me wary, a little too sure of herself, maybe and white… It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.”

But what about Barry Soetoro?

Something snapped in Barry one particular summer. Perhaps dissociative identity disorder kicked in after years of struggling with his racial identity. He managed to take a trip around the world visiting Muslim countries and his African homeland while on summer vacation from Occidental College. And he somehow did this while living on US Federal Student Aid and a Fulbright Scholarship as an Indonesian exchange student. He was very likely funded by his wealthy Muslim roommate. For whatever reason, he departed as Barry and returned as Barack. From that summer on, Barry Soetoro has been safely tucked away from reach and Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. was born (Ironically, both Barry and Barack were likely not born in this country).

Obama is not an enigma. Barry Soetoro is. He is a fearful, psychologically wounded little boy doing whatever it takes to prevent people from really knowing him and getting too close. This indicates some measure of shame on his part. His psychological adaptation methods, whether conscious or unconscious, are impressive. He has used his deep psychological dysfunction as fuel to hide and protect the fearful mulatto boy inside him. But make no mistake here. He is an extremely angry man—a quietly steaming cauldron of rage. If Barack does indeed have a puppet-master as many believe, it would be Barry.

Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. is now the self-styled “black man”, the “son of Africa”, the secular Muslim, Barry Soetoro’s alter ego and protector. Barry intends to use him to dismantle our country, not in an effort to improve it, but to punish it. And “it” incorporates all of us here who are “white men and brown men“. He is not an idealist. He seeks atonement in the name of his father and this renders him a very dangerous man.

So, do we give Barack four more years or vote him out and send him to rehab (or prison)?

If we leave it to corruption and the new Lost Generation, he will get a second term. If we categorize his first term as a coup de grâce, his second term would surely be a coup d’état.

Copyright © TMQ2 Blog 28 July 2012

Read Full Post »

Ann Coulter

I consider all Republican debates time-fillers until New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie jumps in, but Monday night’s debate did crystallize for me why I dislike libertarians. (Except one, who is a friend of mine and not crazy.)

They lure you in with talk of small government and then immediately start babbling about drug legalization or gay marriage.

“Get the government out of it” is a good and constitutionally correct answer to many questions, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all answer to all questions.

It was a good answer, for example, when libertarian Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, was asked about government assistance to private enterprise and government involvement in the housing market.

But it’s a chicken-s**t, I-don’t-want-to-upset-my-video-store-clerk-base answer when it comes to gay marriage.

Asked about gay marriage, Paul said, in full: (more…)

Read Full Post »

Ann CoulterJune 8, 2011

In Part One of my new book — released this week! — “Demonic: How the Liberal Mob Is Endangering America,” I demonstrate that liberals have all the earmarks of mob psychology.

Their myths, slogans, demands for immediate action, messianic goals, demonization of opponents, creation of political idols and occasional resorts to violence — all this is classic herd behavior.

Because mobs are irrational, immature, subject to wild passions and infatuations, they cannot be reasoned with. And they are always dangerous.

The mob attributes of liberals we will review this week are a crowd’s inability to perceive contradictions and its tendency to form an infatuation for an individual.

Consider just one blinding contradiction recently embraced by liberals. (more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: