Hey Mitch McConnell!
Any GOP who votes against Kavanaugh should be stripped of all assignments & instead made Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Go F– Yourself.
Hey Mitch McConnell!
Any GOP who votes against Kavanaugh should be stripped of all assignments & instead made Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Go F– Yourself.
Graham’s claim to fame is: 1) having twice negotiated a voluntary surrender for the GOP on immigration; and 2) winning 0.00 percent of the vote when he ran for president two years ago.
You could run for president on the platform that we should kill babies and eat them, and you’d get more votes than Lindsey Graham. Who designated this most remote of back-benchers, thoroughly rejected by the American people, as the principal negotiator on Trump’s central campaign promise?
Graham’s thought process seems to be: We had an election, I ran for president; literally no one voted for me, so my views should prevail over the guy who won an Electoral College landslide.
How about getting Dennis Kucinich in there? Has anyone asked Martin O’Malley for help in the “DACA” negotiations?
To a rapturous media, Graham has been peddling the lie that President Trump blew up a beautiful bipartisan deal on immigration. It wasn’t “bipartisan,” except in the sense of being “angrily rejected by the voters.”
It’s the same deal that has gone down in flames at least twice before. It’s the same deal that has already destroyed the careers of Sens. John McCain, Marco Rubio, Jeff Flake, Bob Corker, Kelly Ayotte, Mark Kirk and Gov. Jeb! Bush.
It’s the same deal President Bush tried to push through Congress in 2006 — with Graham’s support! — leading directly to the Republican wipeout in the midterm elections later that year. (Innumerable polls showed that the public hated Bush’s proposed amnesty even more than it hated the Iraq War.)
It’s the same deal that voters repudiated for approximately the 87th time when they made Donald Trump president (and — again — gave Lindsey Graham zero votes).
Notwithstanding the media’s phony polls showing 98.6 percent of voters wildly enthusiastic about amnesty for “Dreamers” — or “Nightmares,” as radio host Howie Carr calls them — every time the public gets its hands on an actual ballot, it votes for: less immigration, punishing employers who hire illegals, no government services for illegals, no driver’s licenses for illegals, no amnesty ever, English-only and Donald Trump.
What the media call a “bipartisan deal” didn’t even meet the basic definition of a “deal.”
For at least a decade now, the argument for amnestying the Nightmares has been: Screw the parents. THEY SUCK! They were the lawbreakers … but don’t blame the innocent children (single typewriter key) brought-here-through-no-fault-of-their-own.
Then we get to see the big bipartisan deal, and it’s: We amnesty the kids — but also the parents! Not only is this not meeting Trump halfway, it’s also doubling the distance.
It’s like negotiating in the Kasbah:
Democrats: We demand $30!
Republicans: We’ll give you $10.
Democrats: OK, $200.
Lindsey Graham: DEAL!
How did an existential issue for the Republican Party get assigned to the single worst person to negotiate it?
It would be as if during Bush’s presidency, anti-war Republican Chuck Hagel had anointed himself spokesman for the GOP on the Iraq War. Republicans would have gone nuts! They would have been screaming at the media, the Democrats and the president: DO NOT TALK TO CHUCK HAGEL!
The fact that Senate Republicans have not done this in the case of Graham and immigration makes me think the fix is in. If we had a party that was serious, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Senate GOP would say, “That’s great that you and Jeff Flake have been having meetings, Lindsey, but you don’t speak for us.”
It’s hard to avoid the impression that other Republicans are saying, God bless Lindsey. There, but for the grace of God, go I — because this is what our paymasters want. The Business Roundtable doesn’t care what Republicans have to do to fool the base, provided: Another year goes by, the Nightmares are still here, and we haven’t sealed the border.
Either Mitch McConnell is very, very stupid or the reason he’s not pulling Graham is precisely because he keeps missing shots.
Let’s see, what’s the stupidest way we could do this? Every single day of Trump’s campaign he promised everyone a wall and mass deportations. What if we DON’T build a wall, but take the person who got zero votes, was the earliest and most vociferous in attacking Trump — and involve him centrally in the negotiations on immigration?
Recall that McConnell spent $8 million to defeat Rep. Mo Brooks in the Alabama Senate Republican primary last August, leading to Trump’s humiliating defeat in the reddest state in the Union in December. There’s nothing embarrassing about Brooks. But he’s with Trump on immigration, so he had to be stopped.
Voters get lip service on “securing the border” at the same time that Republicans are letting Graham negotiate amnesty. The complicit senators hide in their offices and practice looking shocked. No, Lindsey! That’s not what we wanted at all! … Oh well, what are you going to do? Let’s just get those illegals their permanent residence cards and move on to more tax cuts for Wall Street.
It’s said so often that it’s become a cliche: Elections have consequences. Just this once, couldn’t an election have a consequence? A wall and deportations — YES! Amnesty for the Nightmares — NO!
The current issue of Newsweek (yes, it’s still in business!) has a picture of President Trump sitting in a recliner, with snacks and an iPad in his lap, pointing his TV remote at the viewer, blazoned with the headline, “Lazy Boy.”
Liberals only wish.
Last week, the president joined Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and David Perdue (R-Ga.) to announce legislation that would make seminal changes to our immigration laws for the first time in more than half a century, profoundly affecting the entire country.
The media have chosen not to cover the RAISE Act (Reforming American Immigration for Strong Employment). This bill is their worst nightmare.
Instead of admitting immigrants on the basis of often specious “family” ties, the bill would finally allow us to choose the immigrants we want, based on merit, with points granted for skills, English proficiency, advanced degrees, actual job offers and so on.
Most Americans have no idea that we have zero say about the vast majority of immigrants pouring into our country. Two-thirds of all legal immigrants get in not because we want them — or even because Mark Zuckerberg wants them — but under idiotic “family reunification” laws.
The most important provision of the RAISE Act would define “family” the way most Americans think of it: your spouse and minor children.
Unfortunately, that’s not how the Third World thinks of “family.” In tribal societies, “family” means the whole extended clan — adult siblings, elderly parents and brothers-in-law, plus all their adult siblings and elderly parents, and so on, ad infinitum. Continue reading “ANN COULTER: TRUMP GOT YOUR TONGUE, MEDIA?”
17 May 2017
Every time I try to be mad at Trump, the media reel me back in by launching some ridiculous, unprovoked attack. This time, it’s the fake news story about Trump “leaking” classified information to the Russkies.
The president can’t “leak” classified information: It’s his to declassify.
The big secret Trump allegedly revealed is that Muslims might try to blow up a plane with laptops. I already knew that. I read it in The New York Times.
The New York Times, March 22, 2017:
Devices Banned on Some Planes Over ISIS Fears
“Intelligence showing that the Islamic State is developing a bomb hidden in portable electronics spurred the United States and Britain on Tuesday to bar passengers from airports in a total of 10 Muslim-majority countries from carrying laptop computers … two senior American counterterrorism officials said. …”
This totally secret, Deep Throat-level information has been widely published in thousands of news outlets throughout the civilized world. There was yet another round of stories last week with the update that the U.S. is considering a laptop ban on flights from Europe as well.
Hey, you know what might make more sense than banning laptops? How about banning Muslims?
Bear with me here, I’m still working out the details, but I’m almost certain a federal judge in Hawaii can’t block a president’s temporary ban on Muslim immigration just because he’s testy with Trump over some campaign statements.
As Northwestern law professor Eugene Kontorovich explained in The Washington Post, courts have never examined a politician’s campaign statements for improper motive, because 1) campaigns are not part of the deliberative process; and 2) to start doing so would open the door to “examinations of the entire lives of political officials whose motives may be relevant to legal questions.
Nonetheless, Kontorovich says, that is the legal argument being advanced against Trump’s travel ban: “Trump is a bigot, and thus his winning presidential campaign in fact impeaches him from exercising key constitutional and statutory powers, such as administering the immigration laws.”
To preserve their judicial coup, this Monday, the 9th Circuit sent out the geriatric ward to hear an appeal of the Hawaii judge’s absurd ruling. At their ages, there’s a good chance the judges will be dead by the time the Supreme Court overturns them.
Arguing against Trump’s exercise of his constitutional and statutory powers was first-generation American, Neal Katyal. (There are plenty of 10th-generation America-haters. You couldn’t get one of them to argue that we should end our country through mass immigration?) Continue reading “Ann Coulter: EVERY TIME I TRY TO BE MAD AT TRUMP, THE MEDIA PULL ME BACK”
Many moons ago Lance regaled us with tales of derring-do, specifically about how he fucked Ann Coulter in the ass real hard.
I think Ann needs some proper sense properly shagged up her corn hole as soon as possible.
The Republican debates loosened her tongue to disgorge anti-Semitic rantings when it should have been sucking hard on some hard Jewish dicks.
I admit I used to be a fan of hers but now all I can offer her is an official TMQ2 invitation to. . .
SHUT THE FUCK UP
Ann Coulter uncorked: ‘Are you people awake?’
Lightning rod unleashes on what’s wrong with right
WASHINGTON — The left loves to hate political dynamo Ann Coulter, and many on the right have found themselves upset with her, too.
The criticism from conservatives began in 2010 when Coulter addressed an event titled “HOMOCON” sponsored by the homosexual Republican group GOProud that promotes same-sex marriage and military service for open homosexuals. A year later, she joined the advisory board of GOProud.
Then came her call for Gov. Chris Christie, R-N.J., to run for president in 2012.
And anger from the right flared yet again over her support of Republican presidential nominee, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.
Some conservatives found both of those Republicans too liberal. Coulter retracted her support for Christie but has steadfastly defended Romney.
A year ago, Coulter said, “My flirtation with Christie was like running off with a biker. He was new and exciting — and made conservatives feel alive. But I came back to the responsible choice. Romney is the absolute best man to run against a dirty street fighter like Obama.” Continue reading “ANN COULTER: NEMESIS TO THE LIBTARDS”
Seung-Hui Cho, who committed the Virginia Tech massacre in 2007, had been diagnosed with severe anxiety disorder as a child and placed under treatment.
But Virginia Tech was prohibited from being told about Cho’s mental health problems because of federal privacy laws.
At college, Cho engaged in behavior even more bizarre than the average college student. He stalked three women and, at one point, went totally silent, refusing to speak even to his roommates. He was involuntarily committed to a mental institution for one night and then unaccountably unleashed on the public, whereupon he proceeded to engage in the deadliest mass shooting by an individual in U.S. history.
The 2011 Tucson, Ariz., shopping mall shooter, Jared Loughner, was so obviously disturbed that if he’d stayed in Pima Community College long enough to make the yearbook, he would have been named “Most Likely to Commit Mass Murder.”
After Loughner got a tattoo, the artist, Carl Grace, remarked: “That’s a weird dude. That’s a Columbine candidate.” Continue reading “ANN COULTER: GUNS DON’T KILL PEOPLE, MENTALLY ILL DO”
WAKE THE FUCK UP AMERICA!
Let it not be said that I particularly dislike Mr. Michael Savage. Or for that matter, let it not be said that I particularly dislike any of the plethora of other supposedly conservative pundits such as Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, Dennis Miller or Ann Coulter just to name a few. Additionally, not only is it not a factual statement to say that I especially dislike any of the aforementioned individuals personally. Neither is it a factual statement to say that I dislike our preeminent, supposedly conservative news source, Fox News, as a whole.
Even though I have recently issued a well deserved “Fuck You!” to all of them collectively by means of the well-known single-fingered salute that was proffered in a previous article, it was certainly not my intention to signify any personal dislike towards them individually or collectively.
“Then what is it, Marshal?” might be a good question. Continue reading “REVELIE! REVELIE! REVELIE! DROP YOUR COCKS AND GRAB YOUR SOCKS!”
Tearing Down the White Man
Was it his voluntary name change from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama, II, which was done neither legally nor officially? Was it his close relationships with radical Muslims and Islamofascist groups like The Muslim Brotherhood? Was it his contempt for Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu? Was it his curtsy before the Saudi king? Was it his acknowledgement that he is a Muslim? Or, was it all of these things and more of the same?
[Note to Ann Coulter: You might want to flush out your headgear, my dear. I’ve loved your writings and have followed you for years, but you lost me on this one.]
From Obama’s book, Audacity of Hope:
“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
It is common knowledge that Islam’s sharia law is integrated into and within the religion, thereby making it seemingly impossible to be a secular or cultural Muslim alone, sans the religion. I agree with Ann when she states that Obama is an atheist. But when applying Islam to Obama, it is accurate to say that he is a secular Muslim. He is more akin to Louis Farrakhan‘s Nation of Islam members than he is to garden variety Muslims. When needed, he has applied Islam as a tool, an outlet for his “hate whitey” mindset, just as he did in the quote above. The more I read it, the more it sounds like a loosely veiled threat. Does his behavior not indicate that he is already standing with the Muslims?
From Obama’s book, Dreams from My Father:
“I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself: the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.”
Image is one thing, actions are quite another. And Obama is no Martin or Malcolm, DuBois or Mandela. He is much more dangerous. But he will eventually fail because he is deeply flawed and has limited intellect — let’s call it low cranium capacity.
In Obama’s writings, he leaves it to us to derive his true meaning when he writes of emulating his father’s image, “the black man”. We are left to read between the lines in order to construct our theories and conclusions about him. Then we must compare our theories to his actions for validation. Only then can one understand who Obama really is and how he thinks.
His intentional lack of directness could be labeled a shrewd method to avoid exposing his true psyche. However, it is more likely an indication of deep-seated fears or cowardice. He leads this country in a passive aggressive manor because he himself has a passive aggressive personality coupled with a splash of cognitive dissonance, both of which are rooted in his dilemma of being comprised of mixed races. He even writes using the passive voice.
Passive aggression should not be confused with passive resistance, the Marxist philosophy of a rational response. Passive aggression is irrational and hints at an underlying personality disorder. Obama appears sneaky, dishonest, arrogant, full of false pride, egotistical, narcissistic, hateful, racist, corrupt, and attempts to quell his fear of the world by working to control it. All the while, we get a sensation that somebody must be behind him pulling the strings. How could this man be doing the things he does without somebody propping him up? He came out of nowhere and now he’s the POTUS and looking at a possible second term.
I mentioned that he is corrupt. He is a classic example of how absolute power corrupts absolutely. Our system of government was designed by our forefathers with the specific intention of preventing scenarios like this from happening, keeping the power spread out and subject to scrutiny, thereby preventing executive branch tyrants from usurping the remaining two branches of government, the judicial and the legislative. But our system now appears broken because our POTUS completely disregards and ignores the framework of our constitution and attempts to rein in all the power for himself and his criminal regime. The way he sees it, if he destroys our American way of life, realigns this country into his image of what he wants (needs) it to be, he won’t fear it any longer. This while concurrently striking back with quiet vengeance and simmering anger at his arch enemy—the white man. This clearly seems to be his underlying motivation. Does it strike you as rational behavior?
More from Dreams from My Father:
“I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites… I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race… There was something about her that made me wary, a little too sure of herself, maybe and white… It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.”
But what about Barry Soetoro?
Something snapped in Barry one particular summer. Perhaps dissociative identity disorder kicked in after years of struggling with his racial identity. He managed to take a trip around the world visiting Muslim countries and his African homeland while on summer vacation from Occidental College. And he somehow did this while living on US Federal Student Aid and a Fulbright Scholarship as an Indonesian exchange student. He was very likely funded by his wealthy Muslim roommate. For whatever reason, he departed as Barry and returned as Barack. From that summer on, Barry Soetoro has been safely tucked away from reach and Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. was born (Ironically, both Barry and Barack were likely not born in this country).
Obama is not an enigma. Barry Soetoro is. He is a fearful, psychologically wounded little boy doing whatever it takes to prevent people from really knowing him and getting too close. This indicates some measure of shame on his part. His psychological adaptation methods, whether conscious or unconscious, are impressive. He has used his deep psychological dysfunction as fuel to hide and protect the fearful mulatto boy inside him. But make no mistake here. He is an extremely angry man—a quietly steaming cauldron of rage. If Barack does indeed have a puppet-master as many believe, it would be Barry.
Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. is now the self-styled “black man”, the “son of Africa”, the secular Muslim, Barry Soetoro’s alter ego and protector. Barry intends to use him to dismantle our country, not in an effort to improve it, but to punish it. And “it” incorporates all of us here who are “white men and brown men“. He is not an idealist. He seeks atonement in the name of his father and this renders him a very dangerous man.
So, do we give Barack four more years or vote him out and send him to rehab (or prison)?
If we leave it to corruption and the new Lost Generation, he will get a second term. If we categorize his first term as a coup de grâce, his second term would surely be a coup d’état.