SMOLETT’S MOVE ON

“As a Jew” I am bewitched, bothered & bewildered by the charges against half Jew, gay, black, “hate crime victim” Jussie Smollett being dropped.

I am nowhere near as outraged as are Chicago Mayor Emanuel or Police Superintendent Johnson.

Details were kept from all three of us concerning the deal.

Maybe it was a tit-for-tat response to President Trump not being indicted.

I’ve heard through anonymous sources that O.J. Simpson will be assisting Smollett in bringing the real perpetrators to justice.

AS A JEW

These three words are most often used as a preamble by Jews who have very little or no connection to Judaism as a smoke screen and a hammer to take sides against Israel and or other Jews.

Sometimes these words don’t have to be spoken for Jews to take sides against the best interest of the community or Israel.

Democrats, the party of treason, manages to produce elected officials that fit this bill.

I’m talking to you, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, Chuck Schumer.

You lilly livered, mealy mouthed, spineless, fish faced, enemies of your people.

You remain silent on the sidelines when Jews are slandered and libeled, showing more concern for those pressing the attack.

As a Jew, individually and collectively accept the challenge to heed the words of the prophet Jeremiah as he quotes from the Lord God.

But they did not listen or pay attention; instead, they followed the stubborn inclinations of their evil hearts. They went backward and not forward. 

They have built the high places of Topheth in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to burn their sons and daughters in the fire—something I did not command, nor did it enter my mind.

Let the one who boasts boast about this: that they have the understanding to know me, that I am the Lord.

You three slugs better grow some stones and pay more attention to those in your party who enable and enhance those who will spill Jewish blood than your treasonous efforts to dismantle the President.

Jewish lives are at stake and you will be held responsible in this life and the next.

ET TU BRUTUS? ET TU?

As the sinking ship known as Democrats goes down, how long will it be before talk of how they were stabbed in the back by those disloyal, ungrateful, hyper-white Joos is shouted from the mountain tops?

from the NY Post

Jewish voters are furious at Dems’ defense of Ilhan Omar

Jewish voters furious at Democrats’ defense of Rep. Ilhan Omar say they’re done with the party that has held their support for generations. “We felt we had a home there,” said Mark Schwartz, the Democratic deputy mayor of solidly blue Teaneck, NJ. “And now we feel like we have to check our passports.”

Jordan Manor of Manhattan, who calls himself a “gay Jewish Israeli-American,” laments, “The party I thought cared about me seems to disregard me when it comes to my Jewish identity.”

Mark Dunec, a consultant in Livingston, NJ who ran for Congress as a Democrat in 2014, says, “I’m physically afraid for myself and for my family,” adding, “I see my own party contributing to the rise of anti-Semitism in the United States.”

Omar, a freshman congresswoman from Minnesota, sparked the firestorm in February for using anti-Jewish tropes: saying that support for Israel was “all about the Benjamins” and accusing Jewish-American legislators of “dual loyalty.” Many, including some fellow Democrats, deemed her comments anti-Semitic—but the party’s lefty activists pushed back. “No one seeks this level of reprimand when members make statements about Latin + other communities,” complained Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in a March 5 tweet. 

Omar issued only a partial apology. In response, the House passed a resolution condemning all “hateful expressions of intolerance” with kitchen-sink language that named nearly a dozen different groups. “I feel confident that [Omar’s] words were not based on any anti-Semitic attitude,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.

Many Jewish Dems in the city aren’t buying it. “The fake defense she doesn’t know what she’s saying? I don’t believe it,” said Sara, a Queens teacher who asked not to be fully identified. “This is a grown woman and a member of Congress. Trying to excuse this as naivete is inexcusable.” For her and others, anger is sparking immediate action.

“The watered-down resolution triggered my decision to walk away from the Democratic Party,” said Allison Gangi of Manhattan. “I never dreamed anti-Semitism would have become mainstream on the left, but it has.”

Sara said she is “not comfortable anymore being a Democrat” and will register as an independent.

Among his Teaneck neighbors, Schwartz said, “Our only question now is, do we start voting Republican, or do we become Republicans?”

Others say they feel like the wandering Jew of legend. “I’m homeless. I don’t think I can vote for Trump, even though he’s great for Israel,” said Jason, a start-up owner from Long Island who asked that his surname not be used. “But as a Jew, I can’t see a way to support the Democratic Party. It’s supporting your own destruction.”

Last week, President Trump issued two tweets boosting “Jexodus,” a new advocacy group—advised by a prominent GOP strategist—that encourages moderate and conservative Jews to find a new political home. More than 4,000 people have signed on, organizers said.

“Since launching this, the anti-Semitism we are seeing is so blatant and obvious it’s terrifying,” said Elizabeth Pipko, the group’s spokeswoman and a volunteer on Trump’s 2016 campaign.
The organization’s Instagram and Facebook pages are regularly targeted with hateful messages, she said. “I leave them up, because people have got to see it,” Pipko said.

Could that be coffee that they smell?

HMMMMM????????

Alleged Perps: Felicity Huffman & Lori Loughlin

Am I the only one wondering who all of these rich and famous celebrities and honchos who got stung in the remittance for admittance sleaze fest voted for in the 2016 presidential election?

We welcome any input from our readers connecting the alleged felons with the politics of their choice.

Extra! Pop Calls Pot Bullshit!

From the New York Post:

kamala

Kamala Harris’ dad says her pot use story was ‘identity politics’

The Jamaican father of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris blasted her for saying she smoked marijuana and supports it becoming legalized, claiming she’s playing “identity politics.”

Donald Harris, an economics professor at Stanford University, said she is harming her family’s Jamaican ancestors.

“My dear departed grandmothers … as well as my deceased parents, must be turning in their grave right now to see their family’s name, reputation and proud Jamaican identity being connected, in any way, jokingly or not with the fraudulent stereotype of a pot-smoking joy seeker and in the pursuit of identity politics,” he said in a statement to Jamaica Global Online published last Friday.

“Speaking for myself and my immediate Jamaican family, we wish to categorically dissociate ourselves from this travesty,” her father said.

His daughter, a first-term senator from California who launched her 2020 campaign last month, appeared on New York-based radio show “The Breakfast Club” earlier last week and was asked if she opposed the legalization of pot.

“That’s not true,” she told co-host Charlamagne Tha God. “And look, I joke about it – half joking – half my family is from Jamaica. Are you kidding me?”

Later she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.

“I have. And I inhaled — I did inhale. It was a long time ago. But, yes,” said Harris, whose mother is Indian.

Jamaica Global Online noted the coverage her remark received in the media, displaying headlines like: “Kamala Harris cites Jamaican roots in support of ganja legislation.”

The site went on to scold her about the comments.

“So, the perception created by Ms. Harris’ statement is real and has caused some unease amongst Jamaicans at home and in the diaspora and now, it seems, her father and his Jamaican family,” it wrote. “For some, it is more than mere unease; one Jamaican commenting on social media expressed the concern that ‘soon my job will be singling me out to drug test me since I am from Jamaica. What a stereotype.’ Her concern is not unfounded given the experience of Jamaicans travelling to US ports having sniffer dogs around them in customs halls.”

The Left Would Be Wise To Worry About Its Anti-Semitic Wing

By John Podhoretz

Jewish conservatives get asked this question more than any other: “Why are Jews liberals?” The question eventually got so tiresome that my father, himself a prominent Jewish conservative, wrote an ­entire book about tracing the history back to Biblical times. You can still buy it on Amazon. So I’m not going to answer it here.

What we know is this basic fact: In national elections, Jews vote for Democratic candidates by a margin of 3 to 1. That number has been fairly consistent through four elections now. It suggests Democrats should have no concerns about keeping Jews in their coalition for another generation.

And yet they do have such concerns. And they should.

This week, prominent Democrats announced a new group called Democratic Majority for Israel, led by the pollster Mark Mellman. He told The New York Times: “Most Democrats are strongly pro-Israel, and we want to keep it that way. There are a few discordant voices, but we want to make sure that what’s a very small problem doesn’t metastasize into a bigger problem.”

The “very small problem” Mellman has in mind is a trio of newly elected Democrats: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Michigan’s Rashida Tlaib and Minnesota’s Ilhan Omar. They seem to have very few foreign policy views aside from a caricature of Israel as an occupying colonial force that sits up at night thinking of new ways to torment Palestinians.

Such ideas haven’t arisen from nowhere. They are the full flowering of decades of leftist propaganda and fashionable campus blatherskite. From such repellent acorns mighty trees grow, as we have seen in Europe. Britain’s Labour party did little to head off the virulent Israel hatred in its ranks, and it is now headed by an out-and-out anti-Semite.

In Britain, once-overwhelming Jewish support for Labour has cratered. A poll before the 2017 election found that only 13 percent of Jews supported Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour because of its horrid record on ­anti-Semitism.

That is why Mellman and his fellow Democrats are smart to be doing this now, before the conflict actually begins to bite. The problem is “very small” at this moment, but the party’s trend line to the left suggests it will grow in force absent some major intervention or ideological change of heart.

Nor are the views of the new, leftist members of Congress completely alien to the kinds of Democrats who take official roles in the party. At the 2012 Democratic National Convention, delegates removed language supporting Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

When the Obama White House, fearful of losing campaign dollars, intervened to have the language restored, there was a vocal fight on the convention floor. It sounded very much like those who didn’t want the pro-Jerusalem language restored won a voice vote — and when the chair announced otherwise, the hall erupted in boos.

Bernie Sanders came very close to espousing anti-Zionist opinions openly in 2016, and he won 22 states. His path was softened by the hostile posture of President Barack Obama’s administration. Obama claimed to be a friend of Israel, but there was no country or government he criticized more over his eight years — and he concluded his term allowing a UN resolution hostile to the Jewish state to pass without an American veto.

The activist base’s growing antipathy to Israel is less worrisome to friends of the Jewish state than it would have been at any other time in the country’s history, because Israel finds itself in a surprisingly strong position internationally and at home. It has held the line against Palestinian terrorism, and it is working in concord with Arab and Muslim nations in a manner that would have seemed science-fictional at the turn of the century.

What should be concerning is the subject that goes unaddressed in Mellman’s fight: the potential mainstreaming of anti-Semitism in the Democratic Party as represented by the renewed public importance of Louis Farrakhan and the refusal of vanguard figures on the left, like the leaders of the Women’s March, to repudiate his noxious filth.

Here, too, Democrats need not worry today about this electorally or when it comes to votes and donations. Instinctively liberal, Jews are bound to be more alarmed by some of the white-nationalist encroachments into President Trump’s GOP. But the Corbyn example looms large and is arguably far more dangerous to the American Jewish future than anti-Israel sentiment in the Democratic Party is to Israel’s future.

—–

I think Podhoretz has the cart before the horse.

The Jews are the ones to be worrying.

Most of the left-leaning Jews I know would vote for Hitler himself if it meant protecting legal abortions.

As more Jews abandon Judaism for the theology of progressiveness and distance themselves from Israel and as more Muslims enter this country, “Jewish issues” will be less relevant to Democrats.

Jewish Democrats are rearranging the deck chairs as the Titanic sinks.

It’s a question of how long they can be the Democrats’ punching bag before they either leave their party or religion.

How Lovely

Congratulations to the the Roman Empire State of New York.

Excelsior! Indeed.

Governor Andrew “Evil Eyes” Cuomo, La facha bruta, has signed a law so protective of a woman’s right to control her body, it is now legal to kill any baby who hasn’t crawled out of a uterus on its own.

Additionally it has ruled that teachers with concealed carry permits are not permitted to conceal carry in the classroom.

What wonderful news for psycho school shooters.

I LOVE NEW YORK-

Where they protect your right to murder those who can’t defend themselves.

And Now for Something Completely Different…

Not

A few more thoughts to be added to Lance’s on the toxic concept of toxic masculinity.

The term creates the notion and implication that all masculinity is toxic, which makes it libelous and slanderous calumny.

Granted some toxic behavior may appear masculine but the bigger issue is what can be labeled “toxic feminization backlash“.

For at least one generation there has been a toxic war on boys.

Boys who don’t conform to feminized ideals of behavior or comport themselves like little girls are stigmatized, disciplined or even medicated.

Boyish behavior has been quashed or even criminalized , if not by statute then by the court of public opinion.

If you know about dogs then you are aware that whippets need to run around a lot. If they don’t then they become neurotic and exhibit dysfunctional behavior.

This is what has been done to boys for decades and when one of them reaches a breaking point or is gaslighted by society or rendered psychotic by behavior medication, masculinity at large is held accountable.

Enough of this bullshit.

When my son was about ten he was at a birthday party where the birthday boy received a book entitled, “The Dangerous Book for Boys”, which is all about stuff boys are meant to do. Climb trees, whittle a stick, skim a rock on water, and so on.

Someone suggested I get a copy for my son.

I said, why should he waste his time reading these things when he  actually does them. It’s very empowering for a ten-year old to be given an axe and told, it’s not a toy, be careful, come back with as much dry wood you can carry and I’ll show you how to build a fire and cook on it. Or to take a bunch of boys to Wal-Mart at one in the morning to pick out knives for themselves.

Masculine behavior is not a crime and is not toxic.

Here are some results of “toxic masculinity”:

Getting into tiny boats and crossing the North Atlantic to explore new lands

Clearing the forests and creating new life there.

Establishing a new rule of law based on personal liberty and capitalism benefiting more people than anything else in history.

Freeing the slaves.

Storming the beaches of Normandy and defeating Nazism.

Rushing into burning buildings to carry people to safety.

Making yourself a target to rescue hostages.

This is what masculinity has to offer.

If you think it’s toxic, don’t just shut the fuck up.

Don’t even look in my direction, don’t even exhale near the air I breathe.

Just crawl under a rock and shrivel away you ungrateful piece of shit.

Stupid Is As Stupid Does, So Don’t Cry For Me, Pelham Parkway

The darling de jure of the media and of the left.

According to the Department of Redundancy Department is none other than:

Alexandria “Evita Peron” Cortez representing New York’s 14th Congressional District.

If you enter A-L-E-X-A on Google search she comes up before, Alexa, Alexander Hamilton and Alexander the Great.

She is all over, as they say, like horse shit.

And ironically her fame and fortune seems to be fueled by good old-fashioned, red-blooded American bullshit.

Does this Congresswoman Barbie ever listen to herself?

Does this ignoramus actually believe the moronic lies and half-truths that come out of her pouty little mouth?

She would be a laughing-stock if she wasn’t such a danger to life as intended by our Founding Fathers.

Milking every media exposure opportunity she can, she has the beitzim to say Republicans are obsessed with her.

The only one obsessed with her is herself.

Doesn’t this imbecile realize that 90% of the attention she garners is based on her looks?

She wouldn’t be getting all the oohs and aahs if she looked like Shirley Chisholm.

Wake up and smell the coffee you Commie pin-up girl.

Put yourself to better use for humanity.

Shut the fuck up and show us your tits.

aoc

When Will It Finally Be Never Again?

Everyone loves to feel good about themselves when they can cry over dead Jews.

Those tears are worthless and offensive and as far as I’m concerned you can choke on them.

Think about those tears when you hear some one disparage, deny, demonize or delegitimize Jews and you say nothing, or when the voice is yours.

You want to hate Jews?

That’s your right I suppose, but let me in on your dirty little secret and I’ll give you some real good reasons to hate at least one Jew.

Otherwise shut the fuck up.

Hat tip to Elder of Ziyon and his take on you motherfuckers:

I’m reading various account and commentaries of the horrific shooting and massacre of Jews in synagogue in Pittsburgh today, and everyone is putting up their own political spin on the event. It is expected — and disgusting.

The suspect didn’t target Jews because of “occupation” or because he was a Trump supporter (he wasn’t) or because he had access to guns or because any Jews did anything to him personally. He is just an antisemite who is not sophisticated enough to couch his hate in terms like “anti-Zionist” or “anti-capitalist” or “pro-justice” or any other of the dozens of terms used nowadays to make Jew-hatred a little more palatable.

There are more crimes targeting Jews in America than crimes targeting all other religions combined. There is no common thread — the far-Left hates Jews, the far-Right hates Jews. Muslim Jew-hatred is “understood” and down-pedaled [sic] by the Left. And people will be gleeful that today’s murderer identifies with the far-Right, just as the Right will disavow their role in emboldening the hate on their side.

Antisemitism is not like other hates. There is no logic behind it, no justification for it. Jews aren’t allowed to be in “our country” but are not allowed to be in their own country either. Assimilated Jews are as much targeted as religious Jews. Jews are vilified by extremists of all stripes.

Stop using this massacre as an excuse to pin this on ideological and political enemies. Every group has Jew-hatred associated with them in one way or another. If you truly care about Jew-hatred, root out antisemitism from among the groups that you identify with.

Don’t pretend it isn’t there… because it is.