Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Al Qaeda’

Lest any of you jackanapes, heathens and Philistines forget what The Almighty has in store for those who try and fuck with Jews.

Here is His message to the children of Jacob.

Not the children of Abraham or Isaac because some of them gave rise to Arabs, i.e. Ishmael and Esau.

And kings shall be thy foster-fathers, and their queens thy nursing mothers; they shall bow down to thee with their face to the earth, and lick the dust of thy feet; and thou shalt know that I am the LORD, for they shall not be ashamed that wait for Me.

And I will feed them that oppress thee with their own flesh; and they shall be drunken with their own blood, as with sweet wine; and all flesh shall know that I the LORD am thy Savior, and thy Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob.

Read Full Post »

islamicrage3Any ideology that incites, inspires, motivates or expects its adherents to randomly and without provocation, kill as many of those who don’t subscribe to it, deserves to eradicated from the planet along with its adherents, promoters and enablers.

arab

Read Full Post »

Happy Nakbullshit Day losers.

The most misrepresented  event in world history.

Cuz Emakh.

Am Yisroel Chai Motherfuckers.

Read Full Post »

… An American hero.

Pamela Geller

May she go from strength to strength.

Mohammed cartoon by Bosch Faustin

Mohammed cartoon by Bosch Faustin

– – –

Visit our second post on this issue: O’REILLY VS. GELLER

Read Full Post »

In the interests of objectivity and what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, let’s ponder the following concept.

Why is it that one group of Arab Muslims can fabricate a false history as a distinctive ethnography, claim a nation-state based on this false premise, and garner support throughout the world while another group of Arab Muslims a few hundred miles away do the same thing albeit with more historic validity and the world comes down on them.

ISIS, denying the presence of international borders seeking the creation of their own nation or Caliphate is no different from the Arabs of Israel, Judea and Samaria.

They both are despotic abusers of their own subjects, follow the precepts of the Koran, use terror tactics on any opposition and like to hump goats.

Why are Palestinians any more entitled than the rapidly gestating ISISTAN?

At least there is more historic accuracy of a Caliphate that existed for hundreds of years than the myth of a distinct nation made of “Palestinian” Muslims that never existed and was never even thought about until 1967.

Read Full Post »

Thank Mr. president for revealing your true colors. That you are either criminally stupid or criminally diabolical.

I’m sure John Podhoretz would join us in extending an official TMQ2 invitation to SHUT THE FUCK UP as can be deduced from his following New York Post op-ed.

– – –

At Tuesday’s press briefing, White House mouthpiece Josh Earnest said something disgusting — I don’t know how else to describe it — about the massacre at the Hyper Casher kosher supermarket in Paris one month ago.

“The individuals who were killed in that terrible, tragic incident,” Earnest droned, “were killed not because of who they were but because of where they randomly happened to be.”

Take it from someone who keeps kosher: Nobody “randomly” happens to be in a kosher supermarket, not even in Manhattan.

But you didn’t need to take it from someone who keeps kosher, did you? You already know that the clientele of a kosher supermarket is almost entirely made up of Jews. You know this because you’re not an idiot.

Yes, if you want to find Jews, a kosher supermarket is the place to be on a Friday morning, as people are preparing for the Sabbath.

Since Earnest is the press secretary of the most important person in the world, I assume he isn’t an illiterate dope. Which means he knows this too.

So what he did was speak a vile lie, and a deeply dishonorable one.

It’s dishonorable because his remarks suggest these murders were meaningless acts of nihilism, when they in fact were terrifyingly meaningful acts of anti-Semitic murder on European soil 70 years after the Holocaust — acts that are causing many if not most of the 600,000 Jews in France to think seriously about emigrating.

Alas, it appears that Earnest’s vile lie can’t be excused away as an expression of his own moral cretinousness.

For only a few minutes later, about half a mile away from him in Washington, Earnest’s fellow administration mouthpiece Jen Psaki took to the podium at the State Department’s press briefing and with similar moral cretinousness dismissed the purpose and goal of the Jew-killers at Hyper Casher.

“I believe if I remember the victims specifically,” said Psaki, “they were not all victims of one background or one nationality.”

Asked point-blank by AP’s Matt Lee whether the Obama administration believes “this was an anti-Jewish or an attack on a Jewish community in Paris,” Psaki responded, “I don’t think we’re going to speak on behalf of French authorities.”

After a firestorm of criticism on Twitter, Earnest and Psaki both tried to pretend they hadn’t said what they said. “Terror attack at Paris Kosher market was motivated by anti-Semitism,” tweeted Earnest.

For her part, Psaki said, “We have always been clear that the attack on the kosher grocery store was an anti-Semitic attack that took the lives of innocent people.”

Well, no, you weren’t always clear, now, were you?

What madness was this? What madness is this?

The most comforting explanation is that the administration chose to circle the wagons around President Obama after his flabbergasting remarks on Monday — when he spoke of “violent, vicious zealots who behead people or randomly shoot a bunch of folks in a deli in Paris.”

As we’ve established, it wasn’t “a bunch of folks” but four Jews who were shot — and not, by the way, eating corned beef on rye at Katz’s while Sally faked an orgasm but as they shopped for ingredients for their Sabbath meals.

Which means it wasn’t done “randomly” but purposefully and in a directed fashion. It didn’t matter who they were individually, true. What mattered was this: JEW. JEW. JEW. JEW.

That isn’t random, bub.

So this is the exculpatory argument:

Obama stepped in it on Monday. He said something stupid and ill-advised. (After all, he had previously said the attack was an act of anti-Semitism.) And rather than walk it back, the administration’s blatherskites on Tuesday foolishly chose to step in it even more deeply by twisting themselves into pretzels on the “randomness” issue.

This is what Earnest and the White House want us to believe. In a late-afternoon tweet, Earnest said, “Our view has not changed . . . POTUS didn’t intend to suggest otherwise.”

But what if this is disingenuous and false?

What if the administration is now so committed to its bizarre assertion that the acts of terror in Paris and the horrifying butcheries of ISIS have not been perpetrated in the name of Islam that it chose to dance around the anti-Semitic agency of Islamist Jew-killers — until it was caught out, that is?

If this is so, the moral cretin is the man now resident in the Oval Office.

Read Full Post »

Fourteen years after 9/11, we still lack a strategy. Congress should lead with hearings on the enemy and how to prevail.

The United States has been at war with radical Islamist terrorism for at least 35 years, starting with the November 1979 Iranian seizure of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and taking of 52 American hostages. President Jimmy Carter , in his State of the Union address two months later, declared the American captives “innocent victims of terrorism.”

For the next two decades, radical Islamist terrorism grew more powerful and more sophisticated. On Sept. 11, 2001, a remarkably sophisticated effort by Islamist terrorists killed nearly 3,000 Americans in New York City, Washington, D.C., and western Pennsylvania.

In response to the worst attack on U.S. soil since Pearl Harbor, President George W. Bush told a joint session of Congress: “Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated.”

We have clearly failed to meet that goal. After more than 13 years of war, with thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands of Americans wounded, and several trillion dollars spent, the U.S. and its allies are losing the war with radical Islamism. The terrorists of Islamic State are ravaging Iraq and Syria, Boko Haram is widening its bloody swath through Nigeria, al Qaeda and its affiliates are killing with impunity in Somalia, Yemen and beyond, and the Taliban are resurgent in Afghanistan. The killings in Paris at Charlie Hebdo and at a kosher supermarket are only the most recent evidence of the widening menace of radical Islamism.

Confronted with the atrocities in Paris, French Prime Minister Manuel Valls told his people on Jan. 10 that they were at war: “It is a war against terrorism, against jihadism, against radical Islam, against everything that is aimed at breaking fraternity, freedom, solidarity.”

Yet France, like the U.S. government, doesn’t have a strategy for victory in this war. Ad hoc responses to attacks have failed to stop the growing threat. We remain vulnerable to a catastrophic attack (or series of smaller attacks) that would have dark and profound consequences for the American people and for freedom around the world.

The U.S. and its allies must now design a strategy to match a global movement of radical Islamists who sincerely want to destroy Western civilization.

Congress should lead the way, first by convening hearings that outline the scale and nature of the threat. Additional hearings should seek advice from a wide range of experts on strategies to defeat radical Islamists.

Understanding the global threat, outlining strategies that might lead to its defeat, identifying the laws and systems that need to be changed to implement those strategies—all are complex problems that will require months to sort out. But the American people will rise to the challenge if they are given the facts about the real dangers we face.

Here is an outline of the sequence of topics that Congress should investigate: 
(more…)

Read Full Post »

The Charlie Hebdo martyrs slain by vermin who deserve to be fed alive to pigs, died for the sake of free speech;

So media luminaries have the right to report breaking headlines such as;

December 1941 Torpedo Planes Attack Pearl Harbor
June 1940 Russia Invaded By Tanks
April 1861 Artillerymen Bombard Fort Sumter
September 2001 Pilots Destroy World Trade Center

Very few have the balls to call these vermin what they are: pieces of muslim shit.

Read Full Post »

glassI saw a bumper sticker on a car that also proudly announced it brakes for animals.

Judging by the various rear end impact damage sites I surmise that this car brakes for no reason as well.

Anyway, the sticker that caught my attention pointed out that we “make enemies faster than we kill them.”

I’m at a loss as to whether the driver thinks we need to stop making enemies or feels as I do that the solution to this conundrum is simply to kill them faster.

 

Read Full Post »

As a Harvard senior in 1940, John Kennedy’s thesis was published as a book entitled Why England Slept.

It was an homage to Winston Churchill’s 1938 book, While England Slept.

Both dealt with the pre-war German rearmament and Nazi expansionism.

Ironically Kennedy and Churchill are additionally linked through author/historian William Manchester.

Manchester wrote the 1967 book Death of a President chronicling Kennedy’s assassination in 1963, and The Last Lion, a Churchill biography in trilogy.

It’s the second volume dealing with 1932-1940 that I just started reading.

Priding themselves on a national character of decency, the English working class couldn’t find a more admirable hero to worship than Josef Stalin.

The ruling elite however couldn’t do enough to advance Hitler’s agenda.

Unperturbed by his vitriolic and physically threatening Antisemitism, they enabled him to violate terms of the Versailles Treaty, called for the disarmament of England while throwing France under the bus, and believed giving in to his demands would be the only way to ensure peace.

It was considered unpatriotic in 1933 England to criticize Hitler.

Sound familiar?

Substitute Muslim for Nazi, or any Islamist warlord for Hitler and here we go again.

Given their past history it’s no wonder that England is the cesspool of Antisemitic, ant-west, anti-liberty hate mongers it is these days.

Let’s take all the right-minded truly decent people out of the British Isles, give them Vermont and Quebec and sink whatever is left into the fucking ocean.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: