ISIS has been celebrating the recent devastating Notre Dame fire.

There were conspiracy nuts at Twitter writing today that Interpol and Russian intelligence stated ISIS was the responsible party.

Ilhan Omar was quoted as saying, “Somebody did something to something in some country.”

She went on to complain that Muslims we’re “being blamed for something by somebody and being treated as second class somethings.”

Forever the victims.

Here’s what I know and the readers can draw their own conclusions:

– The fire happened suspiciously close to the Christian holiday of Easter.

– The fire was primarily limited to the apsidal end of the Cathedral. This is the Eastern end facing toward Mecca.

– Muslims have been on a campaign of damaging Christian churches throughout France, vandalizing over 600 so far.

– If this was arson, Muslim refugees that have been inundating France could be the most likely perpetrators.

– Video captured a Muslim Man in Muslim garb on the front balcony who was moving suspiciously and rapidly shortly after the fire began.

– Michelle Obama was taking a Notre Dame riverboat tour during the fire.

In my opinion, Ilhan Omar and Michelle Obama conspired to burn the great church and Barack Obama lit the fire.


Because somebody did something to something in some country.

This fits the modus operandi of the trio.


Also see:

Gas tanks and Arabic documents found in unmarked car by Paris’ Notre-Dame cathedral spark terror fears




byJoan Swirsky
Feb. 8, 2007

From the inception of psychology over 100 years ago, conditions such as autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, narcissism and Tourette’s syndrome were thought to be psychological in origin – and that with enough therapy, enough blaming inadequate parenting, enough talk, enough delving into “feelings,” the sufferer could be treated successfully or even cured.

We now know – thanks to tools like PET scans, MRIs, and pharmaceutical advances – that these condition are all biological in nature, more receptive to medications, augmented with behavioral techniques, than to any of the other “therapies” that were inflicted so ineffectually on millions of people over the past many decades.

The scans, in fact, have revealed the specific areas of the brain that give rise to anger, revenge, anxiety, addiction, eating disorders, stuttering, pathological lying, cheating, manipulation, obsessive-compulsive behavior, depressive disorders, even cravings for chocolate!

How do…

View original post 3,459 more words




They forgot to add that he had a penis the size of a needle. His harem girls called him “Needle Dick the Bug Fucker.”


These three words are most often used as a preamble by Jews who have very little or no connection to Judaism as a smoke screen and a hammer to take sides against Israel and or other Jews.

Sometimes these words don’t have to be spoken for Jews to take sides against the best interest of the community or Israel.

Democrats, the party of treason, manages to produce elected officials that fit this bill.

I’m talking to you, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, Chuck Schumer.

You lilly livered, mealy mouthed, spineless, fish faced, enemies of your people.

You remain silent on the sidelines when Jews are slandered and libeled, showing more concern for those pressing the attack.

As a Jew, individually and collectively accept the challenge to heed the words of the prophet Jeremiah as he quotes from the Lord God.

But they did not listen or pay attention; instead, they followed the stubborn inclinations of their evil hearts. They went backward and not forward. 

They have built the high places of Topheth in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to burn their sons and daughters in the fire—something I did not command, nor did it enter my mind.

Let the one who boasts boast about this: that they have the understanding to know me, that I am the Lord.

You three slugs better grow some stones and pay more attention to those in your party who enable and enhance those who will spill Jewish blood than your treasonous efforts to dismantle the President.

Jewish lives are at stake and you will be held responsible in this life and the next.


As the sinking ship known as Democrats goes down, how long will it be before talk of how they were stabbed in the back by those disloyal, ungrateful, hyper-white Joos is shouted from the mountain tops?

from the NY Post

Jewish voters are furious at Dems’ defense of Ilhan Omar

Jewish voters furious at Democrats’ defense of Rep. Ilhan Omar say they’re done with the party that has held their support for generations. “We felt we had a home there,” said Mark Schwartz, the Democratic deputy mayor of solidly blue Teaneck, NJ. “And now we feel like we have to check our passports.”

Jordan Manor of Manhattan, who calls himself a “gay Jewish Israeli-American,” laments, “The party I thought cared about me seems to disregard me when it comes to my Jewish identity.”

Mark Dunec, a consultant in Livingston, NJ who ran for Congress as a Democrat in 2014, says, “I’m physically afraid for myself and for my family,” adding, “I see my own party contributing to the rise of anti-Semitism in the United States.”

Omar, a freshman congresswoman from Minnesota, sparked the firestorm in February for using anti-Jewish tropes: saying that support for Israel was “all about the Benjamins” and accusing Jewish-American legislators of “dual loyalty.” Many, including some fellow Democrats, deemed her comments anti-Semitic—but the party’s lefty activists pushed back. “No one seeks this level of reprimand when members make statements about Latin + other communities,” complained Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in a March 5 tweet. 

Omar issued only a partial apology. In response, the House passed a resolution condemning all “hateful expressions of intolerance” with kitchen-sink language that named nearly a dozen different groups. “I feel confident that [Omar’s] words were not based on any anti-Semitic attitude,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.

Many Jewish Dems in the city aren’t buying it. “The fake defense she doesn’t know what she’s saying? I don’t believe it,” said Sara, a Queens teacher who asked not to be fully identified. “This is a grown woman and a member of Congress. Trying to excuse this as naivete is inexcusable.” For her and others, anger is sparking immediate action.

“The watered-down resolution triggered my decision to walk away from the Democratic Party,” said Allison Gangi of Manhattan. “I never dreamed anti-Semitism would have become mainstream on the left, but it has.”

Sara said she is “not comfortable anymore being a Democrat” and will register as an independent.

Among his Teaneck neighbors, Schwartz said, “Our only question now is, do we start voting Republican, or do we become Republicans?”

Others say they feel like the wandering Jew of legend. “I’m homeless. I don’t think I can vote for Trump, even though he’s great for Israel,” said Jason, a start-up owner from Long Island who asked that his surname not be used. “But as a Jew, I can’t see a way to support the Democratic Party. It’s supporting your own destruction.”

Last week, President Trump issued two tweets boosting “Jexodus,” a new advocacy group—advised by a prominent GOP strategist—that encourages moderate and conservative Jews to find a new political home. More than 4,000 people have signed on, organizers said.

“Since launching this, the anti-Semitism we are seeing is so blatant and obvious it’s terrifying,” said Elizabeth Pipko, the group’s spokeswoman and a volunteer on Trump’s 2016 campaign.
The organization’s Instagram and Facebook pages are regularly targeted with hateful messages, she said. “I leave them up, because people have got to see it,” Pipko said.

Could that be coffee that they smell?




It’s really very simple.

If you’re a Muslim terrorist and want to be a politician, just move to the states, marry your brother or sister who is now a citizen, get your citizenship and become a Democrat.

In two shakes you’ll be ushered into a congressional seat representing the idiots who voted for you.


Democrats have been hysterical over the last few decades about giving mothers the right to have their fetuses murdered without suffering any consequences. They named this process “abortion.”

First they got Roe vs. Wade passed in the supreme court to not only allow fetuses to be ripped out of mothers’ wombs and murdered, but taxpayer dollars to pay for it. Then they placed this so-called right under the heading of “healthcare” for women and established Planned Parenthood as the agency to oversee abortions and abortion clinics. 

Over the past few months there has been a renewed campaign to extend this program to include the ability to murder babies as they are being delivered. They are also working on the ability to murder babies that have been delivered alive.

One mistake they have made is they haven’t specified a time limit to murder post-delivery babies. I mean is it immediate, 1 hour, or no time limit at all?

If it’s the latter, then a mother could conceivably have her teenage children murdered for “health reasons” and suffer no consequences.

Democratic socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) suggested on Sunday night that people should consider not having children due to climate change because there is a “scientific consensus” that life will be hard for kids and, she said, “people maybe shouldn’t reproduce due to climate change.”

“Our planet is going to hit disaster if we don’t turn this ship around and so it’s basically like, there’s a scientific consensus that the lives of children are going to be very difficult,” Ocasio-Cortez said while chopping up food in her kitchen during an Instagram live video. “And it does lead, I think, young people to have a legitimate question, you know, ‘Is it okay to still have children?'”

What she didn’t say was if women do become pregnant, we should then send them to Planned Parenthood to kill that pesky fetus.

Now I’m thinking that if we end up with no time limit to murder babies, this could backfire on Democrats. For instance, couldn’t we pay Ocasio-Cortez’ mother to have her aborted for being so stupid and such a threat to this country?

Maybe it isn’t such a bad idea after all.

It’s too bad the mothers of Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are most likely not astill living because we might pay-and-persuade them to abort their post birth children!

Would aborting Democrats between voting age and 120 years old be such a bad thing?