Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Second Amendment’ Category

……  from all the Democrats.

In my baboon’s ass blue of a state, the word gun is inexorably linked to “right wing nut job”.

And yet again a mass shooting by some degenerate leftard loser.

If the Democrats are so set against anyone having a gun why don’t they start with their own ilk voluntarily turning them in?

Better yet, take the guns away from Democrats and leave them with us responsible folk.

Read Full Post »

shootings

Read Full Post »

Females in combat? Damn right!

This very young lady demonstrates her outstanding and deadly shooting skills using an automatic rifle, a semi-automatic pistol, and semi-automatic shotgun—all with live rounds!

Kudos to her parents for allowing her to develop these very important skills at such a young age.

You never know, she might turn out to be an American military hero someday, win the medal of honor for double tapping hadjis while bravely risking her life to save her combat cohorts.

She’s already a hero in my eyes.

Then again, she might get drummed out of the service for refusing to fire upon (murder) American citizens.

I want to meet the Fed who thinks they have the guts to illegally disarm this young devil dog. That’ll be one dead Fed full of lead, Fred.

Lock-n-load and engage our enemies, young lady, foreign and domestic, libtard traitors included!

Read Full Post »

Allow me to offer a few words about black on white violence before I address the article below.

The rampant black mob violence (domestic urban racial terrorism) around the country of late is starting to backfire on the Neanderthals carrying it out. Some call it the “knock-out game,” but it’s no game. People fear being attacked and are readying themselves in case they are confronted by violence, whether it be by a black mob, a single black person, or anyone else. And, yes, blacks will be profiled since they are the most likely to attack non-blacks. It’s the sensible thing to do and has nothing to do with racism except for that on the part of the black criminals, self admittedly, and the professional race baiters like Obama, Sharpton, Holder, Jackson et al.

Thank God for the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. We have the right to possess firearms and use them to protect ourselves against a tyrannical government, crime, and to hunt if we so chose. Do you grasp this legal concept Crazy Uncle Joe? Barry Obammy? Fickle Feinstein? Looney Liberals? Poppycock Progressives? Gun control blatherers? And you too Bambi?

To address the article below, as far as I’m concerned, a trespasser on my property is tantamount to a trespasser in my home, and I’ll react accordingly. If I encounter danger away from my home, I will always expect the worse, hope for the best, but give any perpetrator zero opportunity to harm or kill me or any member of my family.

Specifically, if I assess that I have encountered life-threatening danger, the perp is going down — to the hospital if I don’t shoot straight, to the morgue if I do. I’ll deal with the racially lopsided legal system afterward.

From WND:

– – –

Media silence: Another white man shoots black teen
Investigative reporter Jack Cashill draws parallels to Zimmerman case

Burglar Marshall Coulter Shot by Victim

Burglar Marshall Coulter Shot by Victim

A black teenager is shot, in an alleged act of self-defense by an older white man, and the local community is outraged and divided by the violent turn of events. (more…)

Read Full Post »

April 21, 2013

Read Full Post »

Napolitano: The Right to Self-Defense

Commentary by By Andrew P. (Judge) Napolitano

napolitanoIn all the noise caused by the Obama administration’s direct assault on the right of every person to keep and bear arms, the essence of the issue has been drowned out. The president and his big-government colleagues want you to believe that only the government can keep you free and safe, so to them, the essence of this debate is about obedience to law.

To those who have killed innocents among us, obedience to law is the last of their thoughts. And to those who believe that the Constitution means what it says, the essence of this debate is not about the law; it is about personal liberty in a free society. It is the exercise of this particular personal liberty — the freedom to defend yourself when the police cannot or will not and the freedom to use weapons to repel tyrants if they take over the government — that the big-government crowd fears the most.

Let’s be candid: All government fears liberty. (more…)

Read Full Post »

GUN CONTROL WORKS!

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

I hope the feds never attempt to take our firearms away, but if they do, the Civil War will pale in comparison to the can of worms these Washington lawbreakers would open.

Push has just about come to shove and we’re “FED” up.

The Second Amendment to our Constitution is on our side and this right will not be infringed.

We hold the right to defend ourselves against government tyranny, so the minute the feds attempt an arms grab, we are lawfully enabled to use lethal force against them.

And we will.

– – – – – – – –

The following is a well written blog post that puts this entire matter into perspective for all parties involved in the gun rights issue.

If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?

by Dean Garrison

gunsI feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is a frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this, however, is simply because I don’t think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. I blame traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and I carry the responsibility of all small independent bloggers to tell the truth. So my focus today is to lay out your constitutional rights as an American, and let you decide what to do with those rights.

About a month ago I let the “democracy” word slip in a discussion with a fellow blogger. I know better. Americans have been conditioned to use this term. It’s not an accurate term and it never has been a correct term to describe our form of government. The truth is that the United States of America is a constitutional republic. This is similar to a democracy because our representatives are selected by democratic elections, but ultimately our representatives are required to work within the framework of our constitution. In other words, even if 90% of Americans want something that goes against our founding principles, they have no right to call for a violation of constitutional rights.

If you are religious you might choose to think of it this way… Say that members of your congregation decide that mass fornication is a good thing. Do they have the right to change the teachings of your God? The truth is the truth. It doesn’t matter how many people try to stray from it. Did I just compare our founders to God? In a way I did, but please note that I am not trying to insult anyone. For the purpose of the American Government our constitution and founders who wrote it are much like God is to believers. It is the law. It is indisputable.

Our founders did not want a “democracy” for they feared a true democracy was just as dangerous as a monarchy. The founders were highly educated people who were experienced in defending themselves against tyranny. They understood that the constitution could protect the people by limiting the power of anyone to work outside of it much better than a pure system of popularity. A system of checks and balances was set up to help limit corruption of government and also the potential for an “immoral majority” developing within the American People. We have forgotten in this country that we are ultimately ruled by a constitution. (more…)

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: