YES!!!

Ding-Dong the witch is dead.

I guess we won’t have Hillary Clinton to kick around anymore.

Will all those who said they would leave the country if Donald Trump was elected president please get the fuck out now?

Cohen on Ukraine civil war: ‘Lincoln didn’t call Confederates terrorists’

Reblogged from RT

Published time: June 14, 2014 13:08

COMBO: (L) Confederate infantry re-enactors in Sharpsburg, Maryland, September 15, 2012; (R) Armed men ride an armored personnel carrier in Slavyansk April 16, 2014. (AFP Photo/Reuters)

COMBO: (L) Confederate infantry re-enactors in Sharpsburg, Maryland, September 15, 2012; (R) Armed men ride an armored personnel carrier in Slavyansk April 16, 2014. (AFP Photo/Reuters)

Historical analogies may be inaccurate, but Americans may need to look at their own civil war and compare it to what is happening in Ukraine now. Today the US supports a murderous criminal adventure that has little to do with unifying the country.

This assessment came from Professor Stephen Cohen, prominent US scholar of Russian studies and author, who advised George H.W. Bush in the late 1980s. He spoke to RT about the mistakes of the consecutive American administrations in their Russia policies, the worst crisis in decades that they led to and the deterioration of political discourse in America that prevents things from changing in Washington.

Cohen challenged the narrative of the Ukrainian events dominating in the US, calling the military crackdown by the government an “unwise, reckless, murderous, inhuman campaign that Kiev is conduction against what are admittedly rebel provinces.”

Stephen Frand Cohen

Stephen Frand Cohen

“Lincoln never called the Confederacy terrorists,” the scholar pointed out. “He always [called them], no matter how bad the civil war was, fellow citizens he wanted to come back to the union. Why is Kiev calling its own citizens terrorists? They are rebels. They are protesters. They have a political agenda. Why isn’t Kiev sending a delegation there to negotiate with them?

“Their demands are not unreasonable. They want to elect their own governors – we elect our own governors. They want a say on where their taxes go – ‘no taxation without representation.’ We know what that is,” Cohen said. “There are extremists among them, but there are also people who simply want to live in a Ukraine that is for everybody. And instead the Kiev army, with the full support of the United States, is conducting this assault.”

A man looks at a residential building, where he resides, which was damaged by what locals say was overnight shelling by Ukrainian forces, in the eastern Ukrainian town of Slaviansk June 12, 2014. (Reuters/Gleb Garanich)

A man looks at a residential building, where he resides, which was damaged by what locals say was overnight shelling by Ukrainian forces, in the eastern Ukrainian town of Slaviansk June 12, 2014. (Reuters/Gleb Garanich)

‘Kremlin an essential ally Washington pushes away’

What the US doing with Ukraine now is alienating arguably the best potential ally it has now, Cohen said.

“I am convinced that the most essential partner for the American national security in all of these areas from Iran to Syria, Afghanistan and beyond is the Kremlin, currently occupied by Putin. And the way the United States has treated Putin – I would call it a betrayal of American national interest.” Continue reading “Cohen on Ukraine civil war: ‘Lincoln didn’t call Confederates terrorists’”

REVOLUTION? IT’S TIME TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP!

“In questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” —Thomas Jefferson

thomas_jefferson

If you truly believe that your American government has an inherent duty to protect and serve its citizens, to enforce the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights to the letter, then you likewise have an inherent duty to oust any government—by whatever means necessary—when they fail or become corrupt and tyrannical. This is where you are right now.

The latter is rarely if ever successful without bloodshed, carnage, horror, and emotional scars etched deep into the psyches of those who fight and those who lose loved ones during the fight. Military veterans and their families know this all too well, some more than others.

The next question would be, Who’s going to fight against the tyrannical government? There are varied thoughts on this subject, but the simplest and quickest answer that offers the most bang would be to look at your veterans. You might be surprised to learn that as of 2011, the United States had 21.5 million military veterans, most living inside the United States.

Of course, not all of them would fight, and not all of them could fight, and some would fight alongside the corrupt government, some are a part of it (think McCain). So let’s be conservative and suppose that only 15 percent of the 21.5 million would be healthy enough, willing enough, and effective enough to stand against the tyranny. This would leave a little over 3 million veterans, the largest paramilitary force in the world, even larger than China’s. Remember, this 3 million figure is a very conservative one and could be as high as 5 or 10 million.

One thing every one of these military veterans has in common is the oath they took upon entry into the military. Here’s an excerpt: “…I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…” Ironically, this oath was also taken by Federal office holders like the president on down. Those who still believe in this oath, and those who understand that it never expires, will be the patriots. Those who break this oath, as the sitting president has on more occasions than most people can remember, will be the enemy… your enemy. Period.

Now you know why the federal government has been stockpiling billions of rounds of ammunition. They’ve been preparing to kill you for a long while now.  They have a date all lined up and are just marking time until the M-day arrives, Murder Day. Meanwhile, they’re baiting you, attempting to steal your guns and money with the hope that some fed up citizen will create the perfect spark to justify their plot to murder and/or enslave you.

The Bundy Ranch fiasco was nothing more than the Feds sticking their big toe in the water to check the temperature. It was a dry run of sorts. Believe me, this situation is not over. The Feds weren’t ready to go balls to the wall just yet. I’m sure they were surprised by the backlash, but now they know how Americans will react, therefore they can train and be ready the next time for a much more surgical strike.

When are you going to start preparing to fight back? That’s right, I said fight BACK. They’ve been shoving it to you at a progressive rate akin to the boiling frog anecdote. They’re coming, and they are coming for you. It’s time for you to put up or shut up. Otherwise, if the tyrants win, you will become less valuable than sheep or cattle, if you are still alive. Life as you know it will be over. You will truly know how it feels to be “FED UP”.

So, what’s it going to be, patriots, muskets or sabers?

– – –

Also read:

Continue reading “REVOLUTION? IT’S TIME TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP!”

THE FEDS, THE BUNDYS, JANET RENO AND CUSTER

…and let’s not forget Waco, Texas and the Branch Davidians.

Harry Reid is General Custer II.

Beware, America, the Feds will regroup after their latest humiliating retreat from Bundyland because the Feds won’t (Read: Harry Reid won’t) let this one go. Sooner or later Reid’s deep-seated hatred for Americans and his love for communism, power, and tyranny will be his undoing. Meanwhile, we have to deal with his tyranny in a lawful manner even though we know he is the one fueling this fight in order to pocket Chinese money and abuse fine Americans to do it. Harry has been bought and paid for by the Chinese, therefore we can no longer trust him.

So, let’s allow him (and the Feds) to self destruct. Here’s how.

Strategery

Janet Reno the Murderer
Janet Reno, Murderer of the Branch Davidians with a noggin only a lesbian leper could love.

American Militia units should repeat the strategy used by the Black Hills Sioux Nation when they were being dogged by General Custer. Let the enemy advance into an inescapable position for the perfect massacre.

The Sioux slayed Custer’s entire force. Why? Because Custer let his hubris cloud his limited combat abilities and prop up his limitations as a battlefield commander. Or, in modern terms, he let his mouth write checks his ass couldn’t cash. And his Cavalry Troopers paid for his misjudgment and arrogance with their lives. Somewhere in the area of the Black Hills of South Dakota is the scalp of General George Custer. They earned it, and even though I was also a Cavalry Trooper, I have enough honor to respect an enemy who defeats us in a skirmish or full-blown blitzkrieg.

So, when the Feds finally step up to make their next illegal move against American citizens (esp. the Bundys), put every last one of these Federal bullies and traitors down. Leave them for the buzzards, and let’s not forget the protected tortoises, they need to eat too. One day, Harry Reid is going to wish he was a protected species. And oh what a great day that will be.

Ironically, Janet Reno is more of a man than Harry Reid and his pussy son will ever be.

Waco, Texas Massacre by the Federal Government
Waco, Texas Massacre by the Federal Government, on Janet Reno’s order. Women and children were unnecessarily burned alive by the heartless, law-breaking Feds.

 

More from GOPUSA:

The Ranch Davidians

When the government moved to seize Cliven Bundy’s cattle for his failure to pay grazing fees on public land, a growing group of supporters came to his defense — literally. On April 12, after a tense and heated standoff with them, heavily armed federal agents released the cattle back and retreated.

The situation was eerily reminiscent of past ill-fated federal standoffs, such as Ruby Ridge and Waco, where federal agents raided the Branch Davidian compound and 76 people died.

This situation is different, though.

Whether right or wrong in their actions, the Bundy family can’t be caricatured as a cult or a danger to anyone. And the family’s predicament has ignited a firestorm of anti-government fervor, particularly in the West. Bundy backers traveled miles to show their support and face down the feds. Conservative locales in cyberspace and on the radio dial crackled with anti-government rhetoric.

The thing is, we suspect the government and media elites, if they’re paying any attention to this powder keg at all, likely don’t get it.

The West, thanks to geographic and ideological distances, has always had an arm’s length relationship with both government and media. But the flashpoint in Nevada can’t be dismissed as cowboy rebelliousness. There’s plenty of sympathy for their position around the country.

The Eastern elites probably have no clue why, either.

They doubtless have no idea how poorly the federal government is viewed today — despite all the evidence in polls and surveys. After being spied on by the NSA and targeted by the IRS and having jackbooted federal agents show up to tell them how it’s going to be, folks — good, hardworking, taxpaying, God-fearing people — are tired of being abused.

As a practical matter, whether the Bundy family is in the right has ceased to matter. Like any other civil rights hotspot, all it needed was a spark.

Nor does it help that the Obama administration is so loath to deal with illegal immigrants in such a manner as it has the Bundy family. The government can’t secure the border — and is even insisting on amnesty for the illegals already here. But they send armed officers to crack down on American ranchers? Outrageous.

And the manner in which they’ve done it is just as galling. As The Las Vegas Review-Journal noted in a recent editorial, to tamp down protests, government officials “closed off hundreds of square miles of public land. They’ve closed roads. And they prohibited protected assembly and expression across huge areas of Clark County. They even took the step of creating ‘First Amendment areas’ — where no federal official or contractor directly involved in the roundup would ever have to see protesters.

“You see, even peaceful protests can be intimidating to government types. If government types feel slightly threatened, they arm themselves to the teeth. When they arm themselves to the teeth, they’re far more likely to view a peaceful protest as cover for an attack on the government. And if they believe someone holding a sign or a camera might also have a gun, agents are more likely to hurt someone. Thus, the government suspends the First Amendment as a public safety measure: Citizens are denied their rights to peacefully assemble and engage in political speech because the content of that expression might be ‘intimidating’ enough to make government agents overreact and hurt them.”

The problem is, inside the government it is impossible to consider the possibility that the government can ever do any wrong.

We don’t know if the Bundy family is the best rallying point. But the support they’ve gotten from angry citizens is evidence that the government has a much bigger problem on its hands than a few head of hungry cattle.

AMERICAN HUNTERS – LARGEST ARMY IN THE WORLD

Preface to the America’s Hunters essay below:

Obama was reelected for a second term though there was very clear and substantial evidence that he was, in fact, a failed and inept president. The point is that the overall body politic has lost its common sense and spirit of liberty, and we are imploding from within. Without a violent uprising, the firepower of the hunters (described below) cannot save us, and such a violent approach is not likely.

Think about this: In our Revolutionary War, only about one third of the population was in favor of fighting for liberty; one third sided with the British; and one third did not have a clue as to what should be done. If, in that era, there had been widespread communication and a generic vote, a revolution would have been an unlikely outcome.

We are now likely doomed to socialistic mediocrity and servitude as a nation. Look down the road at ObamaCare and amnesty for illegal aliens—think!

Even Virginia just recently voted for a pure nerd (and Obama supporter) as governor instead of a solid, proven, no-nonsense patriot and a genuine champion of personal liberty.

American Hunter

AMERICA’S HUNTERS

Another blogger added up the deer license sales in just a handful of states and arrived at a striking conclusion. There were over 600,000 hunters this season in the state of Wisconsin.

Over the last several months, Wisconsin’s hunters became the eighth largest army in the world. This is more people under arms than in Iran, and more than France and Germany combined.

These hunters deployed to the woods of a single American state, Wisconsin, to hunt with firearms and no one was killed. That number pales in comparison to the 750,000 who hunted the woods of Pennsylvania, and Michigan’s 700,000 hunters, all of whom have returned home safely.

Toss in a quarter of a million hunters in West Virginia and it literally establishes the fact that the hunters of those four states alone would comprise the largest army in the world.  Then add in the total number of hunters in the other 46 states. It is millions more.

In addition, let us not forget American military veterans and others who do not hunt. They still have their guns, are not afraid, and will always know how to use them.

What is the point?

America will forever be safe from foreign invasion with that kind of homegrown firepower! Hunting is not just a way to fill the freezer. It is a matter of national security.

This is why all enemies, foreign and domestic—like Obama and the libtards—want to see us disarmed. Keep this in mind when next we consider gun control.

If we embrace assumptions like hunters do not possess the same skills as soldiers, the question would remain, what army of 2 million would want to face 30 million, 40 million, or 50 million armed citizens?

For the sake of our freedom, never allow gun control. Moreover, be ready to use lethal force against anyone who attempts an illegal and / or forceful confiscation of our firearms. Give up your life so that your children might live.

Make the mother fuckers pay a high price every fucking time they show up to disarm us. While they’re at our house, and since we did our intel and know who they are and where they live, be at their house slaughtering their families. Then wait for them to come home and double tap the traitorous asshole who came after you.

[Note: I found the above essay on the internet and do not know the identity of its author. I edited it a bit, but it remains generally intact.]

Why Do Americans Prefer A Bad Case Of Hemorrhoids To Our Government?

In Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, the pamphlet that came out in January 1776 and turned the public toward seeking independence from Britain, he speaks directly to the question posed above:

“Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country without government, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer.”

Read Common Sense here. Substitute our own piece-of-shit known as “Barack Obama” for the “King” (not a far substitution in his mind) and substitute our feckless, no-balls-having punk-ass “Congress” for “Parliament”.

The presumption throughout the text of Common Sense is that tyranny should never again be tolerated. Despotism was for the old world. Tyranny was outdated. It belonged nowhere in a land conceived in liberty. The only question was when and how to overthrow despotic rule. The upshot of Paine’s book was that now was the time. Waiting would only lead to continuing and deepening calamity.

Paine’s idea was that society needed no overarching ruler to give it direction. It needed no official church to make it religious. No king was necessary to give society decorum or to manage relations with other nations. It needed no central plan to spell out a list of priorities. It was an attempt to wholly recast the way people thought about how the world works.

And people believed it would work. Why? Because they saw it all around them. The world of the Colonies was made by Americans, not by some far-off, distant, deeply ignorant ruler in ermine robes living in London… or now in Washington D.C.

It is a sad commentary indeed that the distance between the ideals found in Thomas Paine’s Common Sense and those of today’s America are so vastly differing as to be nearly unrecognizable. The world that Thomas Paine dreaded — the thing he feared the most and the tyranny that he had dedicated his life to opposing — is now upon us. Today, successors like Edward Snowden are not writing monographs for us to read, but languishing in sanctuary in Russia, of all places.  In the very nation that fought a revolution for the rights of the individual against the state and has fought a multitude of wars… two World Wars… against tyranny, aggression and oppression, the brilliant innovators and freedom fighters of our time are no longer welcome even inside our own borders.

Think of it… How much of what we love was actually built by the politicians, bureaucratic armies, and the central planners within the Beltway?  Are these not the disposable ones?  If you believe so, then once again the time is now!  Waiting will only lead to continuing and deepening calamity.

How enduring is the message of Thomas Paine? Listen to these words:

“O ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose not only the tyranny but the tyrant, stand forth! Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia and Africa have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger and England hath given her warning to depart. O! receive the fugitive and prepare in time an asylum for mankind.”

Sound familiar?

IF THEY COME, LET THEM HAVE IT!

I hope the feds never attempt to take our firearms away, but if they do, the Civil War will pale in comparison to the can of worms these Washington lawbreakers would open.

Push has just about come to shove and we’re “FED” up.

The Second Amendment to our Constitution is on our side and this right will not be infringed.

We hold the right to defend ourselves against government tyranny, so the minute the feds attempt an arms grab, we are lawfully enabled to use lethal force against them.

And we will.

– – – – – – – –

The following is a well written blog post that puts this entire matter into perspective for all parties involved in the gun rights issue.

If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?

by Dean Garrison

gunsI feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is a frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this, however, is simply because I don’t think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. I blame traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and I carry the responsibility of all small independent bloggers to tell the truth. So my focus today is to lay out your constitutional rights as an American, and let you decide what to do with those rights.

About a month ago I let the “democracy” word slip in a discussion with a fellow blogger. I know better. Americans have been conditioned to use this term. It’s not an accurate term and it never has been a correct term to describe our form of government. The truth is that the United States of America is a constitutional republic. This is similar to a democracy because our representatives are selected by democratic elections, but ultimately our representatives are required to work within the framework of our constitution. In other words, even if 90% of Americans want something that goes against our founding principles, they have no right to call for a violation of constitutional rights.

If you are religious you might choose to think of it this way… Say that members of your congregation decide that mass fornication is a good thing. Do they have the right to change the teachings of your God? The truth is the truth. It doesn’t matter how many people try to stray from it. Did I just compare our founders to God? In a way I did, but please note that I am not trying to insult anyone. For the purpose of the American Government our constitution and founders who wrote it are much like God is to believers. It is the law. It is indisputable.

Our founders did not want a “democracy” for they feared a true democracy was just as dangerous as a monarchy. The founders were highly educated people who were experienced in defending themselves against tyranny. They understood that the constitution could protect the people by limiting the power of anyone to work outside of it much better than a pure system of popularity. A system of checks and balances was set up to help limit corruption of government and also the potential for an “immoral majority” developing within the American People. We have forgotten in this country that we are ultimately ruled by a constitution. Continue reading “IF THEY COME, LET THEM HAVE IT!”

IS SECESSION REALLY POSSIBLE?

Now that petitions to secede from the union by 50 states have been posted on the white house “We the People” web site, whether they all gain the mandatory 25,000 signatures or not, I suspect Obama’s response will be something like this:

“We regret to inform the 50 states that petitioned for secession from the union that this issue will not be considered at this time because we have not received petitions from all 57 states.”

**********

IF ANY STATE CAN SECEDE, IT’S TEXAS

By Jeff Turrentine, Slate |  November 15, 2012

The key is the arcane leverage it holds to divide and conquer.

By last Friday, three days after the re-election of President Obama, a curious phenomenon was already taking place on the “We the People” website, which the Obama White House set up in 2011 as an easy way for Americans to petition the executive branch for the redress of grievances. Disgruntled individuals in various states — generously taking it upon themselves to speak for the rest of their states’ populations — were announcing their desire to secede from the union and formally requesting permission from the federal government to do so. Continue reading “IS SECESSION REALLY POSSIBLE?”

The Process of Revolution

by Attorney Timothy Baldwin
 
When a people attempt to be free from a system of government which they deem to be destructive to the ends and purpose of government, those who demand their allegiance and loyalty only heighten the problem and exacerbate the resentment of the people. Consequently, revolution is the result of a government which rules in a manner inconsistent with the principles of a free society, enabling the people to choose different forms of government under different constitutions… }} more…