ET TU BRUTUS? ET TU?

As the sinking ship known as Democrats goes down, how long will it be before talk of how they were stabbed in the back by those disloyal, ungrateful, hyper-white Joos is shouted from the mountain tops?

from the NY Post

Jewish voters are furious at Dems’ defense of Ilhan Omar

Jewish voters furious at Democrats’ defense of Rep. Ilhan Omar say they’re done with the party that has held their support for generations. “We felt we had a home there,” said Mark Schwartz, the Democratic deputy mayor of solidly blue Teaneck, NJ. “And now we feel like we have to check our passports.”

Jordan Manor of Manhattan, who calls himself a “gay Jewish Israeli-American,” laments, “The party I thought cared about me seems to disregard me when it comes to my Jewish identity.”

Mark Dunec, a consultant in Livingston, NJ who ran for Congress as a Democrat in 2014, says, “I’m physically afraid for myself and for my family,” adding, “I see my own party contributing to the rise of anti-Semitism in the United States.”

Omar, a freshman congresswoman from Minnesota, sparked the firestorm in February for using anti-Jewish tropes: saying that support for Israel was “all about the Benjamins” and accusing Jewish-American legislators of “dual loyalty.” Many, including some fellow Democrats, deemed her comments anti-Semitic—but the party’s lefty activists pushed back. “No one seeks this level of reprimand when members make statements about Latin + other communities,” complained Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in a March 5 tweet. 

Omar issued only a partial apology. In response, the House passed a resolution condemning all “hateful expressions of intolerance” with kitchen-sink language that named nearly a dozen different groups. “I feel confident that [Omar’s] words were not based on any anti-Semitic attitude,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.

Many Jewish Dems in the city aren’t buying it. “The fake defense she doesn’t know what she’s saying? I don’t believe it,” said Sara, a Queens teacher who asked not to be fully identified. “This is a grown woman and a member of Congress. Trying to excuse this as naivete is inexcusable.” For her and others, anger is sparking immediate action.

“The watered-down resolution triggered my decision to walk away from the Democratic Party,” said Allison Gangi of Manhattan. “I never dreamed anti-Semitism would have become mainstream on the left, but it has.”

Sara said she is “not comfortable anymore being a Democrat” and will register as an independent.

Among his Teaneck neighbors, Schwartz said, “Our only question now is, do we start voting Republican, or do we become Republicans?”

Others say they feel like the wandering Jew of legend. “I’m homeless. I don’t think I can vote for Trump, even though he’s great for Israel,” said Jason, a start-up owner from Long Island who asked that his surname not be used. “But as a Jew, I can’t see a way to support the Democratic Party. It’s supporting your own destruction.”

Last week, President Trump issued two tweets boosting “Jexodus,” a new advocacy group—advised by a prominent GOP strategist—that encourages moderate and conservative Jews to find a new political home. More than 4,000 people have signed on, organizers said.

“Since launching this, the anti-Semitism we are seeing is so blatant and obvious it’s terrifying,” said Elizabeth Pipko, the group’s spokeswoman and a volunteer on Trump’s 2016 campaign.
The organization’s Instagram and Facebook pages are regularly targeted with hateful messages, she said. “I leave them up, because people have got to see it,” Pipko said.

Could that be coffee that they smell?

TWO NYT REPORTERS PUBLISH OFFICER DARREN WILSON’S HOME ADDRESS

From rightwingnews.com:

The NYT Perps
The NYT Perps

Ferguson, MO – Since the Grand Jury verdict in Ferguson, there have been riots, looting, assaults, guns fired and cars and businesses burned to the ground. Meanwhile, all the criminals and thugs doing this are baying for policeman Darren Wilson’s blood because they don’t like the fact he had his day in court and evidence wasn’t strong enough to bring the case to trial. So, in this violent environment, when the life of Darren Wilson and his new wife are in danger, the New York Times is attempting to impose the death penalty on him via newspaper by publishing his home address.

New York Times reporters Julie Bosman and Campbell Robertson published the address of Darren Wilson in the New York Times, so here are their addresses:

It would be wrong, for example, to publish Bosman’s address at:

5620 N WAYNE AVE APT 2
CHICAGO, IL 60660-4204
COOK COUNTY

It would be similarly wrong to publish the address of Robertson, too:

1113 N DUPRE ST
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70119-3203
ORLEANS COUNTY

So why do journalists think they are beyond examination?

How does it advance the story to know where Darren Wilson and his newly wed live?

It was a disgusting, despicable, immoral act and the two reporters responsible, Julie Bosman and Campbell Robertson, deserve to lose their careers over what they did. Of course, this is the New York Times, so they’re unlikely to pay any sort of penalty. Still, I thought they deserved to pay a price.

Well, it turns out researcher extraordinaire Charles Johnson felt the same way. He acquired the home addresses of both reporters and posted them at Gotnews.

If these New York Times reporters are willing to put Darren Wilson’s address out there when it will unquestionably endanger his life, then they should have no complaints about the whole world knowing where they live. Like they say, what’s good for the goose, is good for the dirtbag New York Times reporters.

Update: The lefties over at the rumor debunking website Snopes have addressed this issue. Snopes is a decent website when it comes to non-political issues, but they habitually lean to the Left on politics. Their treatment of this issue is [a] great example.

They do acknowledge that the New York Times wrote that, “Officer Wilson and Officer Spradling own a home together on Manda Lane in Crestwood, Mo., a St. Louis suburb about a half-hour drive from Ferguson. However, they say this doesn’t matter because Wilson isn’t there very often and because other papers published the information months ago.

That doesn’t change the fact that on the eve of riots, the New York Times published the street where Wilson lived. Was he there that night? Was his wife? Hopefully, they were far away, but we don’t know and neither does Snopes. Furthermore, just using the information the New York Times provided, it took me all of about 2 minutes to find his house with that information — in fact I could SHOW IT TO YOU with Google Street View if I wanted. Did they break it out as clearly [as] they did with the New York Times reporters? Nope, but they may as well have and for Snopes to try to spin that just because there are other liberals involved will only further undercut their already waning credibility on political issues.

Take that! you stupid NYT libturd bitches.

What A Difference Fifty Years Can Make

Yesterday we commemorated half a century of John Kennedy martyrdom.

This patron saint of the left, now dead longer than he was alive, ironically celebrated more for his tragic ending than his accomplishments, was the Democrat Party president elected for his promise to lower taxes and his hard-line anti-Communist policy.

Now we have the New York Times (If you plan on using it for toilet paper, don’t, the cheap ink will make your ass dirty.) this week  hawking overpriced mass produced Kennedy trinkets and mementos in their race to cash in on the death cult.

And speaking of race, a president who, if he had a son, would be playing the “knock out game”.

Where’s the condemnation and call for civility on this one from the Piece-of-Shit-in-Chief?

Happy Birthday Israel

Yes Little Satan we will still love you when you’re sixty-four.

Any one who doesn’t share this sentiment can suck it.

The New York Times Is Stalking Me

For years we got the New York Times on Sunday because my wife liked the book review and travel sections.

After fuming over what the rest of the paper contained I finally canceled the subscription only to have it keep showing up.

This Sunday the ink magically transformed itself into ipecac as I read, on the the first page mind you, an article about Michelle Obama.

Giving a glimpse inside a book by Times writer Jodi Somebody or other, this nauseating treatise of life with the Obamas tries to portray her as a combination of Mother Theresa and Eleanor Roosevelt.

Reading between the lines gives off more Eva Peron and Mary Todd Lincoln.

However in my heart of hearts, to me she will always be Lawanda Page.

Also in that paper was an op-ed by Tom Friedman.

Tom starts off by saying all the so called experts who made predictions about the Arab Spring should shut up and take notes.

He then goes on to tell all what their notes should contain.

Especially about how the Muslim Brotherhood is going to behave.

Tom, you are enough of a narcissist for me to assume that you regularly Google yourself to see what responses you get.

Obviously you have declined our invitation to shut the fuck up, but please recognize the fact that you are nothing other than ten pounds of shit in a five pound bag.

Little Nicky

This post takes its title from a year 2000 Adam Sander movie in which his character’s mother is an angel and his father is Satan.

The post itself however is inspired by Thursday’s NY Times op-ed by Nicholas Kristof which shares the same level of dichotomy.

Little Nicky, the movie, I never saw.

Little Nicky, the op-ed piece brought a tear to my eye and warmed the cockles of my heart.

And believe me, my cockles need all the warmth they can get.

Kristof was effervescent, effusive and all a titter over American military action in Libya.

He was against the Iraq war because he knew that the Iraqi people really didn’t want us there.

But this time it’s different because the Libyans are thrilled to have us save them from a psychotic tyrant.

And what’s a little collateral damage in the course of saving lives?

My spider sense tells me that this little Nicky is bitch-yapping for his mack daddy in the White House.

All of a sudden a pointless war of choice on a sovereign nation is for duty and humanity. (This is not a defense of Quackdaffy)

This is the Little Nicky who drumbeats for every Islamist front group, who stated that the Egyptian protesters were no different from the Minutemen of 1776, and condemns Israel for any action it takes to save the humanity of its own citizens from death and destruction.

Unlike Adam Sandler’s character, this Little Nicky has no angel parentage, but was sired and borne by some old-fashioned czarist Antisemitism.

If we haven’t done so already Mr. Kristof, the editors at TMQ2 hereby invite you to:

SHUT THE FUCK UP

Cronkite the Commie Croaks‏ at 92

HOORAY! The Most Mistrusted Man in America Finally Shuts His Cake Hole

Hopefully the America-hating pussies at Daily Kos, Jimmy Carter, Ted Kennedy, Allahpundit, Barney Frank and so many other liberal traitors and/or dickheads won’t be too far behind.

Party time! Ding dong the dick is dead…

Walter Cronkite and skulls of Cambodian genocide victims
Walter Cronkite and skulls of Cambodian genocide victims

See: Walter Cronkite Calls For U.S. Defeat in Iraq

And the Grey Whore (NYT) chimes in with this drivel:

Walter Cronkite, Voice of TV News, Dies

Walter Cronkite, who pioneered and then mastered the role of television news anchorman with such plain-spoken grace that he was called the most trusted man in America, died Friday at his home in New York. He was 92.

The cause was complications of dementia, said Chip Cronkite, his son.

From 1962 to 1981, Mr. Cronkite was a nightly presence in American homes and always a reassuring one, guiding viewers through national triumphs and tragedies alike, from moonwalks to war, in an era when network news was central to many people’s lives. }} more… (Warning! Have your barf bags at the ready)

Ever notice how the most irritating liberals live too goddamn long?

NY Times, CNN: Whitewashing a Terrorist

July 17, 2008 by Ricki Hollander, Gilead Ini, Tamar Sternthal

Whitewashing a Terrorist

The controversial release of terrorist Samir Kuntar as part of a recent prisoner exchange between Israel and Hizballah has been accompanied by attempts to whitewash his actions. Kuntar, who is being greeted as a hero in Lebanon, was convicted of several grisly murders — including the bludgeoning of a 4-year-old. Yet this has not stopped some of the media from trying to sanitize his image.

Take, for example, an article by Craig Smith published in the July 16 edition of the New York Times and its sister publication, the International Herald Tribune. A complete whitewash of terrorism, it gives equal credence to the killer’s courtroom denials as it does to the court’s verdict of guilt based on eyewitness testimony and forensic evidence. 

Oyster Stories in the New York Times

New York Times Writers Don’t Learn Their History

Sure, by now everyone whose ever going to be interested in the subject knows only too well that the New York Times is biased and weak when it comes to certain aspects of its reportage. But that’s the American way. Go around the country and check out all the crummy papers too and you’ll see they’re just as bad, if not worse, when it comes to being biased.

So instead of beating a dead horse, here I aim to show the problem isn’t so much that the New York Times’ writers are biased, it’s that they don’t know and don’t care about the history of any topic whatsoever. That’s just how it goes there. Apparently their editors aren’t nearly as bright as one might think.

How to prove my point? I will pick a story that covered over 1.5 pages in the New York Times on Wednesday May 28, 2008. The story wasn’t particularly political. It was a local story, and a national story at the same time. It was about history, and it was about nature and conservation, and it was about food and dining out.

This particular story spent a tremendous amount of time explaining that oyster culture is making a bit of a comeback in New York’s waters, but the story hardly touched on why the oysters declined in the first place.

Here, I am not going to provide a history of New York’s oyster catch, nor am I going to explain what caused all the ups and downs. Instead, I’m going to tell you a story New York City’s Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia told about the days when he was a lawyer and he had the opportunity to try some cases dealing with the illegal catch of scallops and oysters in the area. This story is from when he worked in the Attorney General’s office: Continue reading “Oyster Stories in the New York Times”

The New York Times: Did You Know …

I’m going to ask you six questions about the New York Times,
comment briefly, then reprint a four-year-old article by Ollie North that drives my point home even farther:

QUESTION 1 – Did you know the New York Times ran 32 front page articles about Abu Ghraib?
And each time America was the whipping boy, blamed for its terrible deeds.

QUESTION 2 – Did you know throughout all of World War II, the New York Times ran only six front page articles about Hitler targeting Jews for total annihilation? Continue reading “The New York Times: Did You Know …”