In the interests of objectivity and what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, let’s ponder the following concept.
Why is it that one group of Arab Muslims can fabricate a false history as a distinctive ethnography, claim a nation-state based on this false premise, and garner support throughout the world while another group of Arab Muslims a few hundred miles away do the same thing albeit with more historic validity and the world comes down on them.
ISIS, denying the presence of international borders seeking the creation of their own nation or Caliphate is no different from the Arabs of Israel, Judea and Samaria.
They both are despotic abusers of their own subjects, follow the precepts of the Koran, use terror tactics on any opposition and like to hump goats.
Why are Palestinians any more entitled than the rapidly gestating ISISTAN?
At least there is more historic accuracy of a Caliphate that existed for hundreds of years than the myth of a distinct nation made of “Palestinian” Muslims that never existed and was never even thought about until 1967.