Feeds:
Posts
Comments

VISIT IBSI

TMQ2 recommends: IBSI

Institute for Black Solidarity with Israel

mlk_56b.jpg

“I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land almost can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security, and that security must be a reality.”

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Institute for Black Solidarity with Israel (IBSI) is dedicated to strengthening the relationship between Israel and the Jewish people, and people of African descent through education and advocacy; condemns the “Zionism is racism” ideology; defends Israel’s right to live in peace with its Arab neighbors; and seeks to help cultivate a mutually beneficial Israel-Africa alliance.

Through the 1975 United Nations Resolutions 3379 “Zionism is racism” was revoked in 1991, its effects are still felt today as the U.N. constantly condemns Israel while largely ignoring true humanitarian crises all over the Middle East and Africa. IBSI also exposes the hypocrisy of anti-Israel Arab Islamists (such as Hamas) who condone and benefit from the trafficking and sale of African slaves, while feigning solidarity with Black people. IBSI exists to tell the truth about Israel; a multiethnic, liberal democracy that is diverse by choice.

Dumisani Washington headshot.JPG

DUMISANI WASHINGTON, FOUNDER

Dumisani Washington is a pastor, composer, author and music teacher in Northern California. He is also an Israel advocate with a vision to strengthen solidarity with the Jewish state among Black Americans and other communities of color. He has been an Israel supporter for many years, and focuses his efforts on young people and college students.

Dumisani is a graduate of the San Francisco Conservatory of Music, and former director of The Zion Academy of Music in Stockton, CA. He is also senior pastor of the Congregation of Zion in Stockton. He and his wife, Valerie, have been married for 29 years, and have six children ages 17 to 28.

Dumisani’s Israel journey began in the early 1990s in a quest to better understand the roots of his Christian faith. The trek became cultural as he studied the Jewish Diaspora and became intrigued by Israel’s multi-ethnic identity; and the return of the Diaspora from Ethiopia, India/Burma, Kaifeng and the world. Dumisani began pro-Israel activism by working with colleagues from Christians United for Israel (CUFI), where he focused primarily on the African-American church, and young people of color.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

JOSHUA WASHINGTON, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

Joshua Washington is a musician and Israel advocate from Stockton, CA. He directs a music school called the Zion Academy of Music located in Stockton. Along with directing the school, Joshua is a composer, arranger, singer-songwriter and band leader; his most recent project being with Aubrey Logan and the Boston Pops. Joshua is also a worship leader and music director at the Congregation of Zion where his musical skills were honed.

As the former Special Programs Director at IBSI, Joshua’s main duties involved partnering with organizations to plan and music direct pro-Israel events across the U.S. As the Assistant Director, he will be doing the same along with planning unique Israel trips for Black Americans and prominent artists and musicians.

Joshua is recently married to South African political figure and human rights advocate Olga Meshoe-Washington, daughter of South African parliament member, Rev. Kenneth Meshoe. Together, they bring the much-needed Israel/Africa conversation to the forefront with their unique messaging and experience.

by Lance and Wikipedia

So-called Black Hebrew Israelites (also called Black Hebrews, African Hebrew Israelites, and Hebrew Israelites) are groups of Black Americans who claim that they are descendants of the ancient Israelites.

What gives them this idea? Where’s the beef?

At the end of the 19th century, Frank Cherry and William Saunders Crowdy both claimed that African-Americans are descendants of the Hebrews in the Bible; Cherry established the Church of the Living God, the Pillar Ground of Truth for All Nations in 1886 and Crowdy founded the Church of God and Saints of Christ in 1896.

Consequently, Black Hebrew groups were founded in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, from Kansas to New York City, by both African-Americans and West Indian immigrants. 

In the mid-1980s, the number of Black Hebrews in the United States was between 25,000 and 40,000. In the 1990s, the Alliance of Black Jews (which is no longer operating) estimated that there were 200,000 African-American Jews; this estimate was based on a 1990 survey conducted by the Council of Jewish Federations. The exact number of Black Hebrews within that surveyed group remains unspecified.

Traditionally, Black Christians in the United States have identified themselves spiritually with the Israelites. In the late 19th century, some of them also began to claim that they were the biological descendants of the Israelites. 

This identification with the Israelites was a response to the sociopolitical realities of their situation in the United States, including slavery and racial discrimination. Democrats were so committed to keeping the black man down and locked in chains they eventually spun our country into a civil war. For African-Americans, appropriating Jewish history was part of a rebellion against the American racial hierarchy that deemed Africans inferior. It was also a means of fulfilling their desire to know their origins and regain their lost history.

These Black Hebrews adhere in varying degrees to the religious beliefs and practices of both Christianity and Judaism. With the exception of a small number of individuals who have formally converted to Judaism, they are not recognized as Jews by the greater Jewish community.

Many choose to identify themselves as Hebrew Israelites or Black Hebrews rather than Jews in order to indicate their claimed historic connections.

In other words, you can only be a Hebrew Israelite or Black Hebrew if you are of African or West Indian descent. White boys need not apply, nor Aramean for that matter.

So, a sect of black Americans suddenly began claiming they were descendants of the ancient Israelites mentioned in the Bible’s old testament based on absolutely no proof. And this was long before the days of DNA testing, which could have proved or disproved their claims.

There is one major issue they seem to have overlooked. To be a Jew, typically your mother must have been a Jew. Synagogues don’t recognize anyone as a “real Jew” without them either being raised a Jew by Jewish parents, by mitochondrial DNA (from your mother), or those who are willing to convert and conversion is a serious commitment. It’s a lot of hard-core study and takes discipline.

Having one’s mitochondrial DNA tested would now be one way to rectify this convoluted situation. DNA testing is available and Jews can be identified at 100% accuracy. I suggest the following. If these claimants have themselves tested, they could in short order learn the truth about the possibility of Jewish heritage.

Unfortunately, from my own observations, the so-called Black Hebrew Israelites of today show themselves to be a bunch of angry, loudmouth, unruly racists and bigots.

They dress in ridiculous garb that has no connection to ancient Jews. They flaunt the star of David. This Star, known in Hebrew as the Shield of David or Magen David, is a generally recognized symbol of modern Jewish identity and Judaism. Its shape is that of a hexagram, the compound of two equilateral triangles. Unlike the menorah, the Lion of Judah, the shofar and the lulav, the Star of David was never a uniquely Jewish symbol, although it had been used in that way as a printer’s colophon since the sixteenth century. Again, not something worn by ancient Jews.

One could ask here, if these people are descendants of the ancient Israelites, why would they place so much emphasis on the Star?

Just over the past few days, they have attended demonstrations where they called Donald Trump a homosexual and verbally attacked other groups. Central to their attacks was mention of race. They called a group of Catholic teenagers “dirty crackers,” a term every bit as abrasive as the word “nigger.”

Conversely, traditional Jews don’t behave in this animalistic manner. They strive to be the light unto nations. They are educated, kind, open-minded and wonderful folks who continue to make huge strides toward improving mankind.

The Black Hebrew Israelites lack any redeeming qualities as far as I can tell. They are thugs and racists for the most part. I lump them in with race baiters like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Obama’s Reverend “God Damn America” Wright.

As for me, I’m calling bull shit on them having any kind of connection to Jews. The sociopolitical realities which have demoralized American blacks is not remedied by false claims of being descended from ancient Israelites. Instead they demoralize themselves even further.

There is no beef.

We need to stop perpetuating the myth of “toxic masculinity.”

We need to start addressing:

Toxic Jew hatred (anti-Semitism)

Toxic infidel hatred

Toxic Islamofascism

Toxic Islamonazism

Toxic Islamism

Toxic terrorism

Toxic Muslim politicians

Toxic Michigan

Toxic Minnesota

Toxic socialism

Toxic liberalism

Toxic progressivism

Toxic Deep State-ism

Toxic Democrat-ism

Toxic political correctness

Toxic journalism

Toxic genderism

Toxic racism

Toxic bigotry

Toxic feminism

Toxic white man hatred

Toxic politicians

But let’s imagine for a moment that toxic masculinity does exist.

It’s par for the course that the only men who supposedly have toxic masculinity are on the right, says the left.

But wait. Wouldn’t the sexual predators on the left actually be culprits if there were such a thing as toxic masculinity as defined by the left?

Perverts like Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey, Anthony Weiner, James Toback, Morgan Freeman, Matt Lauer, Dustin Hoffman, George Takei, Charlie Rose, Al Franken, Reverend Jesse Jackson, Andy Dick, and Oliver Stone, just to name a scant few are concrete candidates. 

Leftist groups like Antifa, Black Lives Matter, KKK, Nation of Islam, the DNC et al would also be culprits.

It’s blatantly obvious this toxic masculinity propaganda is just another invention for the left to smear the right.

And the dumbasses at Gillette swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

Toxic masculinity should really be a metaphor for he-men with courage.

A STUDY, A genome-wide genetic signature of Jewish ancestry perfectly separates individuals with and without full Jewish ancestry in a large random sample of European Americans, indicates that Ashkenazi Jews, though mixed with Europeans to a degree, can nevertheless be genetically distinguished from Europeans with an accuracy of 100 per cent. The title is so informative that pasting the abstract is almost unnecessary, but here is the conclusion which gets to the point:

In conclusion, we show that, at least in the context of the studied sample, it is possible to predict full Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity, although it should be noted that the exact dividing line between a Jewish and non-Jewish cluster will vary across sample sets which in practice would reduce the accuracy of the prediction. While the full historical demographic explanations for this distinction remain to be resolved, it is clear that the genomes of individuals with full Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry carry an unambiguous signature of their Jewish heritage, and this seems more likely to be due to their specific Middle Eastern ancestry than to inbreeding.

There have been other papers which show that Ashkenazi Jews form a separate cluster from gentile whites in the United States. This is important again in the context of biomedical studies attempting to ascertain the genetic roots of particular diseases; population substructure (e.g., Jew vs. non-Jew) may result in confounded associations. Also, one of the authors of the paper is David Goldstein, author of the fascinating Jacob’s Legacy.

In any case, on to the PC charts where the real action is. Do note that I’ve resized and added explanatory labels here & there for clarity.

i-a2f589da83c5fdb38236e67105526c0c-jewpc1

As you can see, there is almost perfect separation between the Jewish and non-Jewish clusters here. PC 1 = first principle component of variation, and PC 2 second principle component of variation. These are the two largest independent dimensions of genetic variance extractable out of the data set. The authors note that there is almost perfect separation along PC 1, and, they note that most of the gentile whites who are closest to the Jews on this PC are of Italian or Eastern Mediterranean origin. This is important later.

i-514e27460f3beec76649da58e082aaf8-jewpc2

As you can see here, the interesting point is that Jewish ancestral quanta is roughly predictive of genetic position. This shouldn’t be that surprising once we know that Jews and non-Jews separate so cleanly (e.g., someone who is biracial would be located between their two parent racial clusters on any plot), but it is striking nonetheless in reaffirming the genetic reality of Jewishness. The United States has an easy genealogical history for Jews, as the ancestors of all self-identified American Jews today arrived on the order of 4-6 generations ago. These individuals were likely Jewish relatively far back in their lineages, and admixture is easy to recall because it is of recent vintage.

Finally, let’s put Ashkenazi Jews in the worldwide context.

i-a0f9bdcea9f789e8de3f266c708a7d7d-jewpc3

I labeled a few populations for clarity. Orcadians are individuals from the Orkney Islands, just off the northern coast of Scotland. As you can see, American whites occupy an expansive region, in large part due to their diverse origins and admixtures. The Druze have been genetically isolated for over 5 centuries, so it is not particularly surprising they form a distinct cluster. It is likely a function of drift due to bottlenecking, just like Iceland. The separation between the Ashkenazi and the Palestinians might be of interest to some because of political reasons.

As the authors note, the Ashkenazi are almost certainly a compound population. There are full-Jews who “look gentile” and full-Jews who could pass easily in the Middle East as a native. Most Ashkenazi Jews exhibit a mix of features. The genetic likelihood that the Ashkenazi have varied origins should be no surprise. The paper notes that Askhenazi heterozygosity is actually somewhat greater than American whites, implying that the source of their distinctiveness has to do with genetic origin, not genetic history (i.e., population bottlenecks). Another population which I suspect resembles the population history of the Ashkenazi are Uyghurs, who fall between Europeans and Han Chinese in their ancestry. But the hybridization even occurred in the past, so the Uyghurs today can be thought of as a separate population with its own suite of genetic combinations, as opposed to a hybrid of two “pure” groups. Similarly, Ashkenazi Jews no doubt emerged from hybridization events between Middle Eastern and European females, but over the generations they have been relatively endogamous (most gene flow has been out of the community into gentile Europeans through conversion) and so are a genetically coherent population in their own right.

Note that the authors had only a few non-Ashkenazi Jews in their sample, so the assertions above only apply to the Ashkenazi (95-99% of America’s Jewish population, but only ~50% of Israel’s).

Update: Dienekes emphasizes that the hypothesis that the admixture element which makes Ashkenazi Jews distinctive from other Europeans is Middle Eastern is somewhat speculative. I’m less skeptical than him seeing as how some Y lineages are Middle Eastern, but he offers this interesting point:

With that said, I do suspect that the distinctiveness of the Ashkenazi Jews is in part due to the possession of a Middle Eastern component of unspecified strength. I base this hypothesis on the results reported to me about the EURO-DNA-CALC test. This test distinguishes between NW, SE Europeans and Ashkenazi Jews; a few Arab individuals who have communicated their results to me have reported fairly high Ashkenazi Jewish components, indicating that part of what distinguishes an Ashkenazi Jews from Europeans is related to the Middle Eastern Semitic background of that group.

From The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller is taking the rare step of publishing this anonymous op-ed at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose career would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers.

 

The letter:

As one of the senior officials working without a paycheck, a few words of advice for the president’s next move at shuttered government agencies: lock the doors, sell the furniture, and cut them down.

Federal employees are starting to feel the strain of the shutdown. I am one of them. But for the sake of our nation, I hope it lasts a very long time, till the government is changed and can never return to its previous form.

The lapse in appropriations is more than a battle over a wall. It is an opportunity to strip wasteful government agencies for good.

On an average day, roughly 15 percent of the employees around me are exceptional patriots serving their country. I wish I could give competitive salaries to them and no one else. But 80 percent feel no pressure to produce results. If they don’t feel like doing what they are told, they don’t.

Why would they? We can’t fire them. They avoid attention, plan their weekend, schedule vacation, their second job, their next position — some do this in the same position for more than a decade.

They do nothing that warrants punishment and nothing of external value. That is their workday: errands for the sake of errands — administering, refining, following and collaborating on process. “Process is your friend” is what delusional civil servants tell themselves. Even senior officials must gain approval from every rank across their department, other agencies and work units for basic administrative chores.

Process is what we serve, process keeps us safe, process is our core value. It takes a lot of people to maintain the process. Process provides jobs. In fact, there are process experts and certified process managers who protect the process. Then there are the 5 percent with moxie (career managers). At any given time they can change, clarify or add to the process — even to distort or block policy counsel for the president.

Saboteurs peddling opinion as research, tasking their staff on pet projects or pitching wasteful grants to their friends. Most of my career colleagues actively work against the president’s agenda. This means I typically spend about 15 percent of my time on the president’s agenda and 85 percent of my time trying to stop sabotage, and we have no power to get rid of them. Until the shutdown.

Due to the lack of funding, many federal agencies are now operating more effectively from the top down on a fraction of their workforce, with only select essential personnel serving national security tasks. One might think this is how government should function, but bureaucracies operate from the bottom up — a collective of self-generated ideas. Ideas become initiatives, formalize into offices, they seek funds from Congress and become bureaus or sub-agencies, and maybe one day grow to be their own independent agency, like ours. The nature of a big administrative bureaucracy is to grow to serve itself. I watch it and fight it daily.

When the agency is full, employees held liable for poor performance respond with threats, lawsuits, complaints and process in at least a dozen offices, taking years of mounting paperwork with no fear of accountability, extending their careers, while no real work is done. Do we succumb to such extortion? Yes. We pay them settlements, we waive bad reviews, and we promote them.

Many government agencies have adopted the position that more complaints are good because it shows inclusion in, you guessed it, the process. When complaints come, it is cheaper to pay them off than to hold public servants accountable. The result: People accused of serious offenses are not charged, and self-proclaimed victims are paid by you, the American taxpayer.

The message to federal supervisors is clear. Maintain the status quo, or face allegations. Many federal employees truly believe that doing tasks more efficiently and cutting out waste, by closing troubled programs instead of expanding them, “is morally wrong,” as one cried to me.

I get it. These are their pets. It is tough to put them down and let go, and many resist. This phenomenon was best summed up by a colleague who said, “The goal in government is to do nothing. If you try to get things done, that’s when you will run into trouble.”

But President Trump can end this abuse. Senior officials can reprioritize during an extended shutdown, focus on valuable results and weed out the saboteurs. We do not want most employees to return, because we are working better without them. Sure, we empathize with families making tough financial decisions, like mine, and just like private citizens who have to find other work and bring competitive value every day, while paying more than a third of their salary in federal taxes.

President Trump has created more jobs in the private sector than the furloughed federal workforce. Now that we are shut down, not only are we identifying and eliminating much of the sabotage and waste, but we are finally working on the president’s agenda.

President Trump does not need Congress to address the border emergency, and yes, it is an emergency. Billions upon billions of hard-earned tax dollars are still being dumped into foreign aid programs every year that do nothing for America’s interest or national security. The president does not need congressional funding to deconstruct abusive agencies who work against his agenda. This is a chance to effect real change, and his leverage grows stronger every day the shutdown lasts.

The president should add to his demands, including a vote on all of his political nominees in the Senate. Send the career appointees back. Many are in the 5 percent of saboteurs and resistance leaders. (RELATED: New Facts Indicate Mueller Destroyed Evidence, Obstructed Justice)

A word of caution: To be a victory, this shutdown must be different than those of the past and should achieve lasting disruption with two major changes, or it will hurt the president.

The first thing we need out of this is better security, particularly at the southern border. Our founders envisioned a free market night watchman state, not the bungled bloated bureaucracy our government has become. But we have to keep the uniformed officers paid, which is an emergency. Ideally, continue a resolution to pay the essential employees only, if they are truly working on national security. Furloughed employees should find other work, never return and not be paid.

Secondly, we need savings for taxpayers. If this fight is merely rhetorical bickering with Nancy Pelosi, we all lose, especially the president. But if it proves that government is better when smaller, focusing only on essential functions that serve Americans, then President Trump will achieve something great that Reagan was only bold enough to dream.

The president’s instincts are right. Most Americans will not miss non-essential government functions. A referendum to end government plunder must happen. Wasteful government agencies are fighting for relevance but they will lose. Now is the time to deliver historic change by cutting them down forever.


What amazes me is that Trump gets so many things done with all this sabotage going on around him, and while being hacked up by lying Democrats and the fake news media.

Twitter is just another of the many liberal social media houses that forces extreme control over the thoughts and expressions of their users.

Their employees comb the tweets with algorithms looking for strong conservative voices so they can suspend those accounts.

Unfortunately, your right to free speech is not recognized by Twitter. Like all liberals they want to scrap our constitution and bill of rights leaving us dependant on leftist control.

Users don’t need to break any of the Twitter rules in order to be suspended. Twitter instantaneously deletes accounts permanently, or gives them a restrictive time-out for 12-hours to one week when they read or see something that doesn’t fit the libtard narrative.

Moreover, during the past year Twitter has even resorted to purging user’s followers. Just today, one conservative had over 2000 of his followers purged from his account. Another had all of his previous tweets deleted. This is clear harassment. If you contact Twitter to complain, you get crickets. If you are suspended, rarely do you receive a reason why. There is no reason except Twitter’s hypocrisy.

If you are a liberal, you never face suspension even if you break all the rules. Twitter creates an arena where one side always wins—the liberal side. The same is true if you’re a Muslim, especially a Muslim congressman who calls our president a motherf**ker. Or if you’re Louis Farrakhan and you rant anti-Semitic sermons on video.

It comes as no surprise that the majority of Twitter stock is owned by a Saudi prince, a Muslim, and we all know how much Muslims love free speech for non-Muslims.

Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud, who in 2011 invested $300 million in the social network, now owns 34.9 million shares of Twitter’s common stock, according to a new regulatory filing. He now owns more of Twitter than liberal ass-hat and founder, Jack Dorsey. 

With all of this, I have developed a theory wherein I believe Twitter’s unfair actions against conservative voices have caused a collective crescendo of rage to build in the conservative community. I’ve watched how the anger has grown and the resolve has strengthened among this group. They are sticking together and building alliances, both of which have been historically rare among the conservatives and the GOP. Their former torpidity is withering away and morphing into a new hardened posture. Conservatives are becoming a wall (pun intended) against the Democrat onslaught.

Conservatives have historically been too passive and don’t typically retort with the same venomous vivacity the left employs. But no longer. Just look at the change in Senator Lindsey Graham’s disposition after being angered by the Democrats and their shameless attack on SCOTUS pick Judge Kavanaugh. And the majority of conservative tweeters are all in for this government shutdown to remain in effect until the obstructionist Democrats get on board with a border wall. These are signs that conservatives are actualizing and becoming tougher.

Twitter is the predominate arena for online political debates and Twitter’s stifling acts are helping to forge the conservative movement into a born-again hard-ass set of strong American patriots.

Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have screwed the political pooch and their days in the political arena are numbered. 93% of Americans believe we have a serious problem on our southern border, yet the Democrats are refusing to consider any remedy out of sheer blind hatred for president Trump. (See: Democrats Get Trump-Thumped Again)

While the Democrats and Twitter are busy throwing us all under the bus, conservatives are circumventing their sedition. I read yesterday that people in droves are sending bricks to Nancy Pelosi. This is atypical behavior for conservatives and provides yet another glimpse into the new conservative fortitude.

I could go on, but you get the point. Democrats are going to lose big in the 2020 elections and Trump will win again after soundly flogging their line up of lefty liberal communist loons. Twitter is doing its part to fuel this outcome, so the joke is on them.

 


Update 16 Jan 2019:

Joe M from Twitter (@StormIsUponUs) just tweeted this:

There has been a sudden rise in auto-blocking over the past two days. This is where Twitter automatically blocks accounts you follow. You don’t realize you blocked them, and never see their posts. [They] are getting ready for something.

Trump has again masterfully outsmarted the dimwitted Dems.

He wants to build a wall on our southern border to protect American citizens from illegal aliens—which is his job—but the Dems don’t want Trump to succeed at anything, at any cost.

They just cannot get over Hillary’s loss in 2016 and want to pummel Trump into so much powder, plus he’s got the power and they want it.

In order to strike out against Trump they will throw not only the American people under the bus, but even their own children, spouses, mothers, fathers, and family pets.

Resist Trump at any cost is their mantra.

Trump understands this and used their own behavior against them.

He took the fight public so everyone could watch.

He started by giving his first address from the oval office explaining his desires and his dilemma with the wall project.

Dems took the bait and came off looking like hyperbolic infants showing their ass cracks on international television.

Chuck Schumer (Duke of Dickhead) and Nancy Pelosi (Duchess of Dementia) offered a short retort full of bullshit immediately following Trump’s address and they looked like propped up corpses who died of drug overdoses.

That was step one.

Today, Trump met with Chuck and Nancy at the white house in order to try and negotiate a deal.

Chuck Schumer in an interview after the meeting said:

“He asked Speaker Pelosi, ‘Will you agree to my wall?’ She said no. And he just got up and said ‘Then we have nothing to discuss’, and he just walked out.”

This left Trump with exactly what he wanted, a public impasse so he could declare an emergency and have the Army Corp of Engineers build the wall.

Dems think they cornered Trump, but Trump manipulated them into doing exactly that. Once cornered, he could use his executive power, his secret weapon.

That was step two.

Trump knows the latest polls show that over 93% of Americans are concerned about border security.

He also knows this wall was a campaign promise he made and his reelection in 2020 depends upon it.

Now, thanks to the Dems, Trump has all his proverbial ducks in a row and the wall is a go.

And the wall will not be piecemeal now, a little here, a little there. It will be the entire wall.

Trump comes off as the hero. The Dems come off as flaming dolts.

And Trump has a bonus by keeping the government shutdown going and it is already being called the Schumer Shutdown.

Later, he can time the ending of the shutdown to his advantage, again coming off as a hero.

Of course the Dems will have some federal judge sign an injunction, but it will lose in SCOTUS just as other injunctions have because it is within Trump’s power to do it.

Further, California’s notoriously liberal ‘9th Circus’ court of appeals, the Dem’s likely choice, is growing more centrist.

No matter how you slice this one, Trump wins again.

To Nancy Pelosi, I say ‘No’ means ‘Yes’.

I was suspended a third time from Twitter.

No big surprise.

Why?

Because I’m a conservative with a sharp tongue and I’m a former soldier.

But I don’t break their rules.

Twitter employees are preying upon conservative tweeters right and left.

They pretend to be regular tweeters, but when you cross them, they have the power to disconnect you from Twitter instantly.

The last exchange was with a supposedly Jewish woman who called me an antisemite then suspended me.

I was ripping her a new six and suddenly found myself reading that my account had been suspended for violating their rules, which was a lie.

I was having a friendly back-and-forth over veteran issues with several tweeters when this liberal butted in, took control of our exchange, and suspended me.

We weren’t even chatting about Jews.

The reason she claimed I was an antisemite was due to my question, “Liberal Jews baffle me. Do they suffer from Stockholm Syndrome?”

She had just, for some reason, stated that she was a liberal Jew.

Calling me an antisemite is tantamount to calling a Muslim an Islamophobe.

The truth of the matter is that she hates the military of which I was a member.

In reality, Twitter is chock full of antisemites and they don’t do anything but encourage them and radical Muslims.

They even stopped translating Hebrew to English, but they’ll translate Arabic all day long.

We all know this is how liberals do business.

The radical Left is trying to silence conservative voices and destroy any group who opposes them.

They billow out their opinions, but stifle any retorts, not unlike the Nazis, and like the Nazis they will lose this war.

Someday Twitter employees will be using the Catholic church to smuggle them to safety in Argentina.

Why do people call them “elites”? There’s nothing elite about them.

They are simply elitists.

I refer them to the title of this post.

 


Update:

I opened a new profile at Twitter and posted a hotlink to this article.

Guess they didn’t like the title because they immediately suspended me for 12 hours.

I was trying to piss the assholes off this time and it worked.

Fuck Twitter.

A SHORT STORY

Obama came into the classroom and wrote a story on the blackboard.

Trump came in and erased it.

The class cheered.

The end

THINGS DEMOCRATS BELIEVE IN

1. Easter Bunny

2. Santa Claus

3. Green Cheese Moon

4. Global Warming

5. Tinker Bell

6. Socialism

7. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

8. Obama’s U.S. Citizenship

9. Islam

10. New World Order

11. Al Gore

12. Cinderella

13. Tooth Fairy

14. Bugs Bunny

15. Illegal Aliens

16. Sexual Predation

17. Mainstream Media

18. Mika Brzezinski

19. Joe Scarborough

20. Russia, Russia, Russia

——

This list is by no means complete. I just got tired of typing.

 

%d bloggers like this: