Why People Who Feel They Are Intelligent and Not Prejudiced Feel They Must Vote For Barack Obama

I don’t understand why liberals feel they must vote for Barack Obama. Is it to prove to themselves that they aren’t prejudiced? To me, such a vote proves only one thing, that they are prejudiced, because no one in their right mind would vote for Obama if he weren’t an African American.

You don’t believe me? You think I must be prejudiced to say that?

I’m way beyond that. I don’t have to prove I’m not an Aryan to be an Aryan. I don’t have to buy non-American cars to prove I’m for America. I don’t have to support the Palestinians to prove I’m not an anti-Semite. And if I were half black, half white, I wouldn’t blame Whites and support Reverend Jeremiah Wright to prove I was a hard-core African American. How is it that people can twist things so easily to make sure they or whoever else, fit in?

Did you know a pro-Nazi Nazi journalist who couldn’t be an Aryan because his grandmother was an American Sioux Indian, was deemed an Aryan by the Germans in 1938? The Chamber of the Press ruled that Sioux Indians were officially Aryan, just to make this pro-Nazi journalist Kosher!

The Muslim Mein Kampf is the Koran. Nazis were stuck with Hitler’s “Mein Kampf.” Second in popularity among Germans to Mein Kampf was Alfred Rosenberg’s “The Myth of the Twentieth Century.”

Most people think Alfred Rosenberg is a Jewish name. They forget that so many Jewish names are actually German names, as is Alfred Rosenberg’s. The closest Rosenberg got to being a Semite was being a hardened anti-Semite.

His 700-page book was for educated Germans. It was the Nazi’s Bible (Koran).

“All the usual psychotic elements of the work of an extreme crackpot are in this book. Orthodox anthropology and history are simply brushed aside. The “myth” is the German Nordic’s awareness of his racial purity and his destiny to rule the world. Everything good is labeled “Aryan.” Everything bad stems from Jews, Catholics, Russians, and orthodox Protestants. Even Christ was an Aryan, though his views were quickly corrupted by Jewish influence. It is worth noting that reputable German scholars did not take the book seriously when it appeared. They ignored it. But the book’s influence was enormous.

No nation has been free of the poisons of racism and the United States is no exception. Our greatest sin, of course, is our treatment of our colored people–a sin inextricably bound up with racial pseudoscience. Even in the northern states, today the average white probably thinks of the Negro as slightly inferior by heredity, and in the South it is almost universally believed. In the light of modern anthropology, these fiews are on a level with the view that the earth is flat, but with one important difference–they are capable of causing infinitely more suffering. When Negroes are given environmental opportunities equal to that of whites, they make the same creative and intellectual achievements. There have been hundreds of carefully controlled research attempts to find a genetic difference between the two races which would justify ranking one above the other. All have failed. George Bernard Shaw summed up the American scene perfectly when he wrote (in Man and Superman) “…the haughty American nation… makes the Negro clean its boots and then proves the inferiority of the Negro by the fact that he is a bootblack.”

What’s my point? Well, to paraphrase George Bernard Shaw, for most liberals, to vote for Barack Obama, even if he is the inferior of the two candidates, proves he must be superior. (The above quoted section is from Martin Garder’s 1957 “Fads & Fallacies in the Name of Science.”)