Double Standard Watch: Carter’s selective sensitivity
by Alan Dershowitz
When Jimmy Carter used the word ‘Apartheid’ in the title of his book Palestine Peace Not Apartheid, he knew it would deeply offend many Israelis, Jews and other supporters of Israel’s efforts to make peace with its Arab neighbors. Yet he deliberately chose that deeply offensive word precisely in order to provoke. As Jeffrey Goldberg of The Washington Post said, it was a case of “bait and switch,” since in the text of the book, the word Apartheid appears only three times and Carter goes out of his way to explain that what he believe Israel is doing “is unlike in South Africa – not racism….”
Carter was cautioned by friends not to use the inaccurate and provocative word Apartheid, but he insisted on putting it in his title, knowing full well how deeply offensive it would be to so many.
Contrast Carter’s insensitivity toward his Jewish readers with his extraordinary oversensitivity toward Muslim readers of Salman Rushdie’s controversial book The Satanic Verses. When Rushdie was sentenced to death in absentia by the Ayatollah Khomeini, and when Khomeini offered “Paradise” to anyone who would murder Rushdie, Carter did not leap to the defense of the threatened author.
Instead, he condemned him for his “direct insult to the millions of Muslims whose sacred beliefs have been violated and are suffering in restrained silence…” To be sure, Carter recited the obligatory defense of freedom of speech (“while Rushdie’s First Amendment freedoms are important …”), and the obligatory criticism of Khomeini (“it is our duty to condemn the threat of murder….”), it is clear that his true sympathies lie with the offended Muslims. This is what he wrote in his article entitled “Rushdie’s Book Is An Insult:”
“This is the kind of intercultural wound that is difficult to heal. Western leaders should make it clear that in protecting Rushdie’s life and civil rights, there is no endorsement of an insult to the sacred beliefs of our Moslem friends.
We must remember that Iranian and other fundamentalists are not the only Moslems involved. Around the world there are millions of others who are waiting for a thoughtful and constructive response to their concerns.”
Carter was relatively silent when millions of Muslims were on a rampage against the Danish cartoons depicting Mohammed (some positively, others negatively).
His sensitivity seems limited to Muslims and Christians. This is what he said about the film “The Last Temptation of Christ”:
“…the sacreligious scenes were still distressing to me and many others who share my faith. There is little doubt that the movie producers and Scorsese, a professed Christian, anticipated adverse public reactions and capitalized on them.”
Yet Carter fully “anticipated” and “capitalized” on the deliberately offensive title of his best-selling book. Nor do I recall any condemnation by him of Mel Gibson’s film, “The Passion of the Christ”, that was deeply offensive to many Jews.
Jimmy Carter’s sensitivities seem to have a gaping hole when it comes to Jews. There is a term for that. src
Also see: The Jimmy Carter Un-Presidential Library
There can be volumes upon volumes of crimes against humanity that Jimmy Carter, our 39th President (how I am ashamed of this fact) have helped foster from not being a true leader in 1979 during the Iranian Hostage atrocity, cutting the funding for the US Military/Veterans Services severely, to creating lies about one of the United States’ major allies and living upon the pockets of the oil-rich Arabs who support modern day terrorism.
Of course we can also go into his silence regarding the raid on Entebbe that happened in 1976, when Israel requested the US/UN to help intervene but both was silent — let’s see who was in charge of the UN? Oh yes, a former Nazi who recently went to his new home in Hades. Didn’t Carter also refuse to enforce a removal of this supporter of the Nazis from the UN? No – again he was silent. But we did hear from Ms. Lillian and Billy Carter on how Jews/Israel are the representatives of the Devil and that all Jews are Christ killers, etc.
It is also more than a rumor that Habitat for Humanity also gets some funding from the Saudis who openly support terrorism. Even this “non-profit” organization somehow supports Hamas. Interesting.
When will the US government finally get a backbone to swallow its pride and charge Carter along with a host of others with not only treason but with sedition too.
I wish we could clone Teddy Roosevelt. He would not have put up with this at all.
Carter is already 83, so it’s also highly unlikely that he’ll get the appropriate criminal prosecution before he dies. He should be sitting in Leavenworth right now, not on some Arab sugar-daddy’s lap.